Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/13/2006 10:44:43 PM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:

Enough already!!



Skip to comments.

BDS [Bush Derangement Syndrome] On the Right (Paleocons, and the like)
To The Point ^ | March 9, 2005 | Dr. Jack Wheeler

Posted on 03/11/2006 4:08:48 PM PST by quidnunc

Ever since George W. Bush won the presidency by preventing Al Gore's hanging-chad attempt to steal it, liberal Democrats have become progressively infected with BDS — Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Here's how I think that the contagion of BDS is now infecting a number of conservative Republicans.

If you're a guy, perhaps you have endured this unpleasant and bewildering experience. You're in a relationship and you and the lady have had some disagreements but nothing major. From your perspective things are pretty ok. Then one day you and she disagree on some minor trivial issue — and suddenly, inexplicably, it escalates as she unloads on you.

It seems like the love of your life has had a personality transplant, you're facing a virago disgorging a torrent of anger, and all you can think is, "Where did this come from?"

If you're a guy, you're nodding your head in understanding. If you're a gal, you're muttering, "Men are so clueless. We give them all these hints for so long that things are bugging us, they never get the message, then when we finally can't take it any more and snap, they're mystified."

I think you get the analogy.

A relationship that suffers this trauma can survive only if both parties calm down afterwards, focus on their mutual interests and commitment, and work together to solve their grievances.

-snip-

But it's another thing entirely when Duncan Hunter (R-CA), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, goes around the bend and offers a bill to make all foreign ownership or leasing of any cargo terminal in any US port illegal. Duncan, my buddy whom I've gone quail hunting with, how could he get so nuts?

There are some 3,200 terminals in US ports. 80% of them are foreign owned or leased. Unions and government regulations have made it impossible for US shipping companies to stay in business, making them bit players in the international shipping business. (See this story in the New York Times, US Companies Weighed Anchor on Ports Long Ago.)

Duncan's bill would cause astronomical damage to the US economy, but he doesn't care because he's on a BDS rant.

-snip-


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antiwarright; bds; brownshirt; fortheloveofpete; getoverit; ignorant; metrosexual; nextissue; paleozenophobicons; sexist; soreloserism; toetheline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-474 next last
To: brainstem223

Thank you for demonstrating the symptoms of BDS.


21 posted on 03/11/2006 5:21:45 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freema

Congress responds to the 83%-17% poll where the public gives overwhelming thumbs down to the port deal. They are there to represent the people, this is our country and we get represented there by our Representatives. That is the American way, and you should be proud.


22 posted on 03/11/2006 5:22:09 PM PST by brainstem223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Unions and government regulations have made it impossible for US shipping companies to stay in business,

Applies to all industries, not just shipping.

You have to be a fool to operate any business with a domestic headquarters. If you want to do business in America today you had better be a lawyer, or run an operation staffed by untraceable illegals. Otherwise you locate overseas and import your product.

I am watching my second career evaporate daily as we loose nearly every bid to companies that use illegal labor; meanwhile everyone who gets a hangnail on the job hires a lawyer and sues the piss out of the owners.

23 posted on 03/11/2006 5:22:56 PM PST by mmercier (can't get back from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Is there an antidote for this disease? Because I've seen quite enough of it around here.

I have always believed that people who don't recognize character, are lacking it themselves.

In reading some of the horrific attacks on the President from so-called conservatives on this board, the fair assumption is that they just can't grasp what it is to have the kind of consistent, Christ-centered character that our President exhibits every day.

PRAY for him! He is being attacked by the Enemy.

24 posted on 03/11/2006 5:24:01 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223; freema
Au contraire..........Congress reacted to pressure from the left and the media, and hysteria caused by the lies the American people were told by both.

The Republicans in Congress should have LED with facts and reason. Instead they panicked and ran. Shameful behavior. Shameful.

25 posted on 03/11/2006 5:26:05 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
Congress responds to the 83%-17% poll where the public gives overwhelming thumbs down to the port deal.

And all based on a big lie of "the UAE is taking over 6 US ports".

Let me ask you a question, was the mantra of "the UAE is taking over 6 US ports" a lie or not to you.

If it isn't, I got boatloads of information to show you that your mantra was a lie.

26 posted on 03/11/2006 5:27:11 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223

The public also admitted they didn't have damn clue of any of the details, how our ports were run, and basically had no basis to formulate an opinion to begin with.

Why should anyone be proud a public that ADMITTED it was uninformed when polled, and gave an opinion anyway, was listened to? Why should anyone be proud legislators, who's job is partially to impart the FACTS to their constituents, were too gutless to do so? IF, THEN, the public knowledgeable on the deal STILL decides against? yeah, represent your constituency. But don't ask us to be proud they represented admitted ignorance. On their part and on our part of their constituents.


27 posted on 03/11/2006 5:28:02 PM PST by Soul Seeker (House Republicans Send a message: All Arabs are Genetically pre-disposed to terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Great post and I fully agree.


28 posted on 03/11/2006 5:37:12 PM PST by Dakara Yakah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
Ronald Reagan may have been the best President we've had in my lifetime, but he wasn't perfect.

Remember pulling the Marines out of Lebanon after the barracks bombing?

Remember signing the tax increases in, what was it, 1983?

Remember the Catastrophic Medicare Insurance Bill?

Remember the Deficits of the 80's?

Remember the Illegal Aliens Amnesty program? I mention these not to be critical of Reagan, but to point out in many ways the second Bush is probably due the same criticisms and praise. In the middle of the Hillary administration we'll wish we had someone like Bush.
29 posted on 03/11/2006 5:39:45 PM PST by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Dang! I was just getting ready to blast that troll on post #11, but he's been banned already! LOL


30 posted on 03/11/2006 5:42:11 PM PST by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

bttt for those accurate remarks!


31 posted on 03/11/2006 5:43:59 PM PST by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Good, glad he is gone.

Trolls like that are easy to spot. No matter how long they've been around, they expose themselves as soon as they start posting the kinds of crap that fills DU, Libertypost and Clownposse.

32 posted on 03/11/2006 5:46:32 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Don't you hate when that happens? LOL!

btw.......interesting that the troll was saying the exact same thing as many of our 'conservative' freepers, eh?

I truly wonder why they aren't ashamed of the fact that they are in perfect alignment with the left on this one?

33 posted on 03/11/2006 5:47:13 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
"His appointments, for the most part have been lackluster and mediocre. "

Didn't need to go further than this to know you don't have a clue

34 posted on 03/11/2006 5:48:25 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
"The far left and far right are natural allies." -Pat Buchanan

Might not be 100% word for word but close enough.

35 posted on 03/11/2006 5:48:34 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
It's that old circle thing. You go far enough around the circle to the right, and you meet up with the left.

They may have different reasons for what they think, but they think in lockstep with the left..........especially about this President. And I find that rather frightening.

36 posted on 03/11/2006 5:51:13 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI


LOL! Me too, and then I decided to first read ALL of the comments!


37 posted on 03/11/2006 5:51:40 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; ohioWfan

That's true, but some fly just under the radar. Stir the pot, under the pretense they're the "real conservatives."


38 posted on 03/11/2006 5:53:50 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
It's that old circle thing. You go far enough around the circle to the right, and you meet up with the left.

Exactly.

39 posted on 03/11/2006 5:54:58 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

There are many posters here that sleep with the enemy


40 posted on 03/11/2006 5:59:44 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson