Skip to comments.
When tolerance means intolerance
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| March 13, 2006
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 03/13/2006 2:34:07 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: MarcusTulliusCicero
On a purely hypothetical note, could you imagine the caterwauling that would go on in the "North" today if they had to fight the Civil War, especially if it divided along Red/Blue state lines? I would imagine that most of the "Red" Western states would join a secession movement from the "enlightened Blue" "North". It would be rather funny to watch the anti-war Norther elite-types struggling between the desire to preserve the "Union" and their pacifist "principles".It would be a disaster for the blue side.
Keep in mind that what you have are "pockets" of blue in those states and due to the large populations centered in those pockets, the state goes blue, but geographically, most of the state would be red.
President Bush captured the popular vote in 85% of the land mass in the 48 states.
That 15% that Kerry carried was all the large cities and a few pockets here and there.
For the sake of arugement we'll leave out alaska and hawaii.
21
posted on
03/13/2006 6:31:00 PM PST
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
See what your reply #4 has done? It has turned your own thread into a civil war thread when the original thread had nothing to do with the civil war.
You gotta watch what you say reb.
22
posted on
03/13/2006 6:40:46 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Liberals are intolerant of the family. Now if that was a statue of Two Mommies And Little Heather - Portland's Art Commissars could live with it. Talk about values hypocrisy.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
23
posted on
03/13/2006 9:48:12 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: sgtbono2002
In order to beat them the North had to throw away the Constitution. I hope we don't have to do that to defeat the Islamofascist enemy of our time.
24
posted on
03/13/2006 10:10:37 PM PST
by
Tamar1973
("There are some things for which we should display no tolerance." Queen Margrethe II of Denmark)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
I have often contemplated the outcome of Civil War v2.0. and to be honest I have frequently wished that the South had won version 1.0.
And no, slavery or racism has nothing to with the subject at hand; there was more to it than that. Read the writings of R.L. Dabney, however, he is not for the weakminded and if you do read his writings, be prepared to have many of your assumptions challenged.
To: Tamar1973
So far nothing has been bent near as badly as Roosevelt bent the rules during WW2.
To: hellinahandcart
27
posted on
03/14/2006 4:06:09 AM PST
by
sauropod
("All you get is controversy, crap and confusion." Alan Simpson defining the WH Pimp Corps.)
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: Sonny M
True, but presumably those states would still go blue unless you started talking about fragmenting states.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson