Before I reply, I will give you a chance to make yourself somewhat clearer.
It is possible to argue that refusal of Felos, Greer, et al. to allow anyone to even attempt to give Terri oral hydration and sustenance was nothing short of murder. Indeed, I happen to believe that to be the case.
It is also possible to argue that such refusal was right and proper. I happen to find such arguments unconvincing, but they are at least facially valid.
If the actions constituted murder, then Bush et al. should have seen that immediate action was taken against the perpetrators.
If the actions were right and proper, then Bush et al. should have left well enough alone.
Either course of action would have been supportable, even if one was wrong. But the only way I can see that the Bushs' actual actions could be argued to have been "correct" would have been if the initial interference was correct, and further interference would also have been correct but was blocked by a coup, and circumstances were not ripe for dealing with said coup.
Laura Bush was on a plane to Afghanistan to celebrate freedom with Afghan women on the very day Terri succumbed to torture sponsored by the State of Florida.
Greer's best friends, the Semblers were at the Inauguration Balls for the bushies. They have always given the Republican Party oodles of money.
Sembler the son is in charge of Charlie Crist's campaign for governor. Crist is both stupid and aloof.