Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What People Earn: How Did You Do?
Parade ^ | March 12, 2006 | Lynn Brenner

Posted on 03/14/2006 8:01:09 PM PST by stainlessbanner

Despite a flourishing economy American workers are less confident about their financial security than they were two years ago. The U.S. has enjoyed four straight years of economic growth, but most families have lost ground: In 2005, more than 80% of American workers saw their inflation-adjusted wages fall for the second year in a row.

While the economy has been growing since 2001, all the benefits of that growth have gone into corporate profits, says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, a Pennsylvania-based consultant firm: “Corporate profits’ share of the national income is at a 60-year high—and that has come directly out of wages and salaries, which are at a record low.” And wages of the top 10% of earners—people making more than $90,000 a year—have risen much faster than everyone else’s. The average worker’s pay stayed almost flat at $27,000 from 1990 to 2004, one study finds.

The U.S. added 2 million jobs in 2005—about the same number as in 2004. Despite the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina, the economy grew 3.6%, and the unemployment rate fell from 5.1% to 4.9%. But dramatic layoffs continue. Late last year, GM said it planned to cut 30,000 jobs. In January, Ford said it would eliminate up to 30,000 jobs too. Since 2000, the Big Three auto manufacturers have cut, or announced plans to cut, almost 140,000 jobs—a third of their North American payroll.

Most forecasters hope that economic growth will continue this year, albeit more slowly, since a cooling real-estate market and higher interest rates are likely to curb consumer spending. Higher energy prices, including home heating, will hurt spending too. And the burden of consumer debt will be heavier: This year, major credit-card issuers will increase required minimum payments from 2.5% to 4% of outstanding balances.

Notwithstanding the low jobless rate, there’s a lot of uneasiness among workers, notes John Challenger, chief executive of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based outplacement firm. “Many people have been falling behind, especially in the middle class,” he says. In 2005, for the first time since the Great Depression, Americans borrowed more than they earned. “Wages haven’t kept up with inflation, and many employers have pushed the cost of health care back to employees in the form of higher premiums and co-pays,” notes Challenger. “Added to that, there’s the higher cost of driving to and from work and heating a home.”

That uneasiness is reflected in PARADE’s annual survey and other polls. “The experts tell the nation that the economy is strong, but the fact is the people you talk to—real people—are struggling,” says Donnie Betts, 53, a documentary filmmaker from Aurora, Colo., who earned $53,000 last year. Teresa L. Harrison, 46, an accounting technician from Lake Panasoffkee, Fla., who made $32,200, tells us: “My income will probably increase slightly this year, but I doubt the increase will cover the higher cost of insurance and gas.” Other respondents agree: “Salaries just don’t seem to be keeping up with the average person’s cost to live,” says James Norton, 41, of Baltimore, who earned $37,600 as a police records supervisor. Adds Paula Goldie, 51, of Troutdale, Ore., who made $40,600 as a municipal court clerk: “I feel like I’m treading water, hoping not to get swamped.”

The median weekly salary in 2005 was $659 (half of all workers earned more, half earned less). After inflation, that’s 1.9% less than in 2004. Average hourly pay for all production and nonsupervisory workers was $16.11—a 0.7% decline when adjusted for inflation. Workers’ retirement and health-care benefits also are shrinking—and not only in troubled industries. Financially healthy companies are freezing their pension plans to exclude new hires and/or younger employees—a trend that’s expected to continue. In a frozen plan, workers stop accruing benefits. This also hurts longtime workers, because they will retire with much less than they expected: Up to 50% of a pension is earned in the last five years on the job.

Health-insurance premiums rose 9.2% in 2005, more than 21/2 times the inflation rate. Some firms are saving money by switching to “limited-benefit plans,” which may not cover the cost of hospital care or serious illnesses. Others no longer offer health benefits: Only 60% of businesses now provide them, down from 69% in 2000. Since 2000, the premiums employers pay to cover workers have gone up 73%. The average cost of family coverage last year was $10,880. Companies are passing a bigger share of that expense to their employees. The average worker paid $2,713 in premiums in 2005. Some employees must choose between health benefits and higher wages. For example, Sue Greer-Pitt, 55, an associate community college professor from Jackhorn, Ky., earned $42,500 and got a 4% raise last year—but her raise was conditional on accepting a health policy that costs her more and covers less.

Anger at the disparity between record corporate profits and shrinking workers’ wages and benefits is a driving force behind “living wage laws,” in which states, municipalities and cities set their minimum wages higher than the $5.15 federal minimum wage, which hasn’t been increased since 1997.

The economy has grown while real wages have fallen because consumers keep spending—thanks to soaring real-estate values and low-interest loans. In 2005 alone, Americans borrowed an estimated $887 billion from their homes through mortgage refinancing and equity loans. The housing boom also has created 1.1 million jobs in fields like real-estate brokerage, mortgage lending, construction and the manufacture and sale of home products. Indeed, our survey respondents in home sales jobs reported the most dramatic 2005 wage gains. Ray Singhal, 62, a Minneapolis-area real-estate agent, saw his compensation jump 50% last year, to $600,000. And in Redmond, Wash., Michelle Traina, 37, saw her earnings jump from $44,000 to $96,000 after she was promoted from home sales representative to home sales manager.

But the housing market started to lose steam by the end of 2005. This year, economic growth is likely to depend on corporate spending. Businesses haven’t made substantial capital investments since the 1990s, but they are flush with cash, and many economists predict they’ll start spending this year. Mark Zandi of Moody’s Economy.com says it’s already happening: “Businesses are investing aggressively in machine tools, aircraft and construction equipment. If that continues, it should be a reasonably good year for job growth.”

The biggest growth will be in financial services, technology, health care and energy, John Challenger says. He predicts high demand for accountants, petroleum engineers, physical therapists, pharmacists, computer specialists, and international sales and marketing managers. Every problem creates new job opportunities: Fear of identity theft has opened up jobs in data security. And heightened national security creates jobs in defense-related fields, from aerospace to software development, as well as in law enforcement. Many police departments are offering higher pay, housing allowances and, in some cases, signing bonuses for bilingual skills.

Education is vital to getting a good job. On average, full-time workers with a high school diploma earn $585 a week; those with a college degree earn $1,029. Men with advanced degrees make $2,887 or more; women make $1,997 or more. But for most families, getting a college degree requires significant sacrifices. Since 1990, while median family income has risen 5.8%, the cost of a bachelor’s degree jumped 63% at public colleges and 47% at private colleges.

Workers need perseverance, stamina, flexibility and patience to succeed in this difficult environment. Among PARADE’s survey respondents this year, two young women seem to exemplify those qualities:

Betty Chu, 29, earned $38,000 as a program coordinator at Harvard Business School—15% less than she made in 2004 as an elementary schoolteacher. “I was willing to take the pay cut to work at Harvard because of the opportunities for advancement,” she says. “I’ve taken on a second job to supplement my income, and I’m finding more and more ways to cut everyday costs.”

Latoya Milana, 26, made $13,000 working full-time as a support professional in a group home for the handicapped. She’s also a full-time nursing student. In 2004, she left a $25,000 job as an accounts-receivable specialist in medical billing to continue her education. “Next year, I’ll make much more money doing a job I love,” she says. “But money isn’t everything. I’d rather make less at a job I love than more at a job I have a hard time waking up for.”

2005 Median Weekly Wages

Petroleum engineers: $1,923
Actuaries: $1,639
Lawyers: $1,609
Economists: $1,569
Chiropractors: $1,531
Aerospace engineers: $1,362
Medical and health-service managers: $1,089
Meeting and convention planners: $912
Loan counselors and officers: $861
Elementary schoolteachers: $826
Funeral directors: $768
Social workers: $700
Pest-control workers: $508
Animal trainers: $482
Actors: $481
Child-care workers: $332
Dishwashers: $296

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Hot Jobs In 2006 and Beyond:

International advertising & promotions managers: $33,760 to $145,000+
Pharmacists: $62,780 to $112,530
Personal financial planners:$31,340 to $108,740
Loan officers: $24,090 to $102,830
Physical therapists: $42,910 to $89,830
Nurses: $24,910 to $77,170
Electricians: $25,730 to $70,200

Source for average annual range of salaries: Challenger, Gray & Christmas, with data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2005review; earning; income; jobs; money; salary; wages
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

1 posted on 03/14/2006 8:01:14 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; Willie Green

bump


2 posted on 03/14/2006 8:02:02 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
d: In 2005, more than 80% of American workers saw their inflation-adjusted wages fall for the second year in a row

Factually incorrect data. They set the inflation rate high to get the "Fact" they wants. More Junk data manipulation to create a preconceived "Result" by the Economic Ignorant Caucus.

3 posted on 03/14/2006 8:04:53 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Lawyers: $1,609
Economists: $1,569
Chiropractors: $1,531


Closely bundled because they are all crooks and frauds. Except Walter Williams


4 posted on 03/14/2006 8:05:16 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Baby boomers will change quite a bit of things in the near future.


5 posted on 03/14/2006 8:07:38 PM PST by Rick_Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

bookmarked


6 posted on 03/14/2006 8:10:58 PM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

The stats in this article don't sound right to me. Median lawyer income is in the mid-70s annually? Half are making less than that? They must be well hidden.


7 posted on 03/14/2006 8:13:48 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Wage growth is always dependent on the skills you bring to market. If you're just a boiled frog then you only have yourself to blame.


8 posted on 03/14/2006 8:14:44 PM PST by baltoga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I make slightly less gross than 2001, but I was in a dot-bomb company. I now work mostly from home and set my own hours... that along with the tax cuts, its a wash. (but then again, I can afford more consumer goods than I could back then as well).
9 posted on 03/14/2006 8:16:03 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Software Engineer:

$70,000 per year.

I was forced to take a pay cut after 9-11 to keep the company alive, but it was restored two years later.

No change since 2004.

10 posted on 03/14/2006 8:17:23 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

I have been seeing a chiropractor for almost 20 years.
As much as you want them to be a fraud, mine is not.
I go in crippled and come out much better.


11 posted on 03/14/2006 8:19:48 PM PST by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
“Corporate profits’ share of the national income is at a 60-year high—and that has come directly out of wages and salaries, which are at a record low.”

This is a misleading statement -- and probably deliberately so. Corporate profits as a share of the national income are at historical highs simply because recent changes in the U.S. tax code -- namely, the elimination of the double-taxation of dividends and the reduction of tax rates on corporate dividends to put them in line with capital gains tax rates -- have provided companies with a financial incentive to pay out their profits in the form of dividends (an incentive that didn't exist for most of the last 60 years).

12 posted on 03/14/2006 8:20:01 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy

There are over 1,000,000 lawyers in this country. Many of them are in low-wage parts of the country, and are stuggling to get by like everyone else.


13 posted on 03/14/2006 8:20:15 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

I actually lost money when I changed jobs laterally within the company due to health reasons last year. I went from an income of around $26,000 down to $21,500.


14 posted on 03/14/2006 8:21:02 PM PST by hoagy62 (Revolution is now the only option....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

"They set the inflation rate high to get the "Fact" they wants.

What the inflation rate really is, depends on what you buy. If you consume mostly slabs of aluminum and bushels of wheat, you're in luck. On the other hand, those in the market for medical care or homeowners insurance may not be so fortunate.


15 posted on 03/14/2006 8:23:46 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
>>>>"There are over 1,000,000 lawyers in this country. Many of them are in low-wage parts of the country, and are stuggling to get by like everyone else"<<<<

What an absolute waste of Food and College Tuition

TT
16 posted on 03/14/2006 8:24:44 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

I find myself in similar conditions.
I didnt have to take pay cuts tho.

My wages continue to rise, but when fuel cost double and health care premiums rise its a wash.


17 posted on 03/14/2006 8:24:55 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Retired so fixed income falls each year. Lucky that I am able to do as much consulting as I want.


18 posted on 03/14/2006 8:26:18 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I wonder if the multi-billion recent tobacco, etc lawsuits have skewed things at the upper end and multimillion illegal influx of low end labor have skewed the statistics in some way?
19 posted on 03/14/2006 8:26:47 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Chiropractors are crooks or frauds because they don't push expensive and dangerous drugs?!?


20 posted on 03/14/2006 8:28:16 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...graduated to Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson