Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Happy 150th birthday: a new era looms for old age
Reuters ^ | Mar 15, 2006 | Ben Hirschler

Posted on 03/16/2006 7:51:36 AM PST by djf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: absolootezer0

I don't doubt that it's possible to live to very old ages, but I don't think the answer is dietary. That's an awfully low tech, simple solution. One that someone would have mastered and continued to use until today.


21 posted on 03/16/2006 8:21:05 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
More likely: a slight bit of exageration.

"I'm 900 years old. Yeah, that's the ticket!"


22 posted on 03/16/2006 8:25:15 AM PST by orionblamblam (A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: LambSlave
Much truth in what you say. I had a professor in the 70's point that out. His speciality was Demographics and he was quite a number cruncher. He said it's all about infant mortality.

You know, the last surviving soldier of the American Civil War died, I believe, in 1959. Some folks have always lived a long time. But in general, if you survive your first few years, you will likely live to see 70. I think that's been true for a long time.

24 posted on 03/16/2006 8:29:56 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Now we will be retired longer than our careers?

Especially as birth-rates fall in Western Europe and the rst of the developed world, life extension becomes more and more important. The point of all this isn't to live like a retiree for an additional 50 years - it's to live a productive, energetic, youthful life for an additional 50 years.

Social Security and other age-based benefits programs already need to be adjusted to current reality - 67 is not that old. The age limit for government benefits will need to be constantly adjusted upward as the human lifespan increases.

Should be some amazing advances in human longevity this century, along with resultant religious, economic and social implications. Interesting time to be alive.
25 posted on 03/16/2006 8:30:16 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: djf
Image hosting by Photobucket
26 posted on 03/16/2006 8:30:37 AM PST by martin_fierro (_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

I KNOW I don't want to live that long!


27 posted on 03/16/2006 8:30:49 AM PST by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
That's an awfully low tech, simple solution. One that someone would have mastered and continued to use until today.

not neccesarily. if you're dealing with extreme primitive cultures, they probably wouldn't see any sort of relationship between the two. but if you think about it, look at the difference in diets between us and primitive man.. how many different chemicals do we take in with every bite of everything? how many chemicals (medicines) have been injected into you? everything that we've taken in may have shortened life span, altho it has improved quality of life (health wise).
28 posted on 03/16/2006 8:31:43 AM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Here is a table of the data, but keep in mind that this is just the mean life expectancy, with no mention of variance or any bounds on sampling or other errors. To the layman, this means that although the table might say that in 1950 the sixty year old could expect to live 15 years, it might have actually been ten years or it might actually be twenty... this depends on factors not included in the table.
29 posted on 03/16/2006 8:40:17 AM PST by LambSlave (The truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
ROFLMAO
How did you get that photo of me?:)
30 posted on 03/16/2006 8:44:13 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: djf

Rest assured that the proponents of euthanasia will do everything they can to convince more people that life in old age is not worth living, and that one will be such a drain on society if one lives this long.


31 posted on 03/16/2006 8:46:13 AM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

ONe of the key factors is the individual's
gene pool. My dad lived to 93 in great health
before failing near the end. Grandparents on
my Mom's side lived well past their 80's too.
No prescriptions or pills to swallow in this
house. And could never remember to take
vitamin tablets. I was raised to get my
essentials from the food on the table.
The wife and I still have a salad and veggies
every night. Not as much meat as we used to
ingest, but we're both retired and don't
need as much protein. Always claimed I want
"to die healthy!" That's been my goal for decades
and I'm well on my way. To date have never made
a Medicare claim either. The old saying about
life being good if you have your health is true.
And an active mind is necessary to achieve old age.


32 posted on 03/16/2006 8:54:52 AM PST by Grendel9 (u ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

So where will all these jobs exist? Especially the ones that will hire 75yo?


33 posted on 03/16/2006 8:57:44 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

LOL....Good one!


34 posted on 03/16/2006 9:16:01 AM PST by fizziwig (Democrats: so far off the path, so incredibly vicious, so sadly pathetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: djf

1,000 years old and still nothing on TV.


35 posted on 03/16/2006 9:27:17 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9

That active mind part is absolutely true.

Ever hear the one about the guy who wanted to live forever? When one of his friends asked him about how he planned to do it, he said, "I'm not sure, but so far, so good."


36 posted on 03/16/2006 9:43:11 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
So where will all these jobs exist?

The same place they exist for younger workers. When a knowledgeable, experienced worker retires in a declining population (as is the case in much of Western Europe), who takes his place? Someone less qualified, and perhaps no one. Extending human life is the only way to keep that valuable knowledge and experience contributing to the economy and to society.

Especially the ones that will hire 75yo?

Age based discrimination in employment should be illegal.
37 posted on 03/16/2006 9:47:17 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Who will hire the young and inexperienced?


38 posted on 03/16/2006 9:50:46 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Who will hire the young and inexperienced?

Companies that want to grow, same as now.
39 posted on 03/16/2006 9:51:43 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

You really believe that there are enough jobs, to support all those people from 20yo to 80yo?


40 posted on 03/16/2006 9:56:06 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson