Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uncle Sam might not want you (Army deems most unqualified to serve)
Wichita Eagle ^ | 3/13/06 | PAULINE JELINEK

Posted on 03/16/2006 5:19:05 PM PST by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Scotsman will be Free

And saying that young people who are pierced or tatooed were probably raised by pagans isn't?


41 posted on 03/16/2006 8:48:41 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe (Olfrygt: the nagging fear of being unable to find beer while out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dancusa; gondramB

My dad, a WW2 USN vet had a huge tattoo on his arm after a wild night in Hawaii. He always had a laugh when telling the story. "It wasn't that big in the book!"


42 posted on 03/16/2006 11:12:16 PM PST by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Have you taken your medication today?

Nitro, beta-blocker, statin--check, check, check.

yep, thanks for caring.

43 posted on 03/17/2006 4:05:49 AM PST by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
That may have changed in the last 18 years, but when my husband was in the Army, in the late 80's, a strict weight number was what they went by. My husband has been overweight his whole life, he was able to make the top part of the weight guidelines to get in, but he was unable to maintain it. He never failed a physical, and in PT he was constantly the #1 or #2 finisher. About 3 years into his 4 year commitment, the Army started a draw down of personnel. Things like no more reenlistment bonuses, no huge incentive to reenlist, etc. They also went back to their strict weight limits, so although my husband still met PT requirements he no longer met weight requirements so they stopped all his "perks". He could no longer take leave.

His last year in the service was miserable, and he did not reenlist.

44 posted on 03/17/2006 4:17:22 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

Other factors include:
"• The rising rate of obesity; some 30 percent of U.S. adults are now considered obese.
• A decline in physical fitness.
• A near-epidemic rise in the use of Ritalin and other stimulants to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Potential recruits are ineligible for military service if they have taken such a drug in the previous year."

They also weed out those with criminal records and those with histories of drug use.


45 posted on 03/17/2006 6:14:13 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Read her post again. She did not state that or imply it.


46 posted on 03/17/2006 6:39:54 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Tatoos on a lady are no different that dents on a brand new Mercedes...

tramp stamps...!

47 posted on 03/17/2006 6:43:28 AM PST by martin gibson (I know not what course others may take, but as for myself, give me Ralph Stanley or give me death!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

The Navy banned tongue splitting like that freak has a few years ago.


48 posted on 03/17/2006 7:04:11 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fso301
It tends to filter out criminal elements.

The ban on convicted felons tends to accomplish that a little better.

49 posted on 03/17/2006 7:21:42 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
The ban on convicted felons tends to accomplish that a little better.

Lot's of 17-18 year old criminals who either haven't been convicted of anything serious or, had juvenile records that were expunged.

That having been said, there is a long tradition of judges giving a young man in a legal jam having an otherwise clean felony record two choices, join the military or go to jail. My comments weren't so much about the person with one or two tatoos as they were about the 17 year old who shows up at the recruiting station festooned with tatoos.

Furthermore, rules are rules, orders are orders. If a recruit is unwilling to have a tatoo removed as a pre-condition for signing up, how likely will that soldier be to follow orders?

50 posted on 03/17/2006 7:41:40 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fso301

A female who has tattooes is no lady.


51 posted on 03/17/2006 7:44:49 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

tatoos? Wouldn't that mean these folks would be easily led? While they may not be leaders, everyone cannot be a leader.


52 posted on 03/17/2006 7:53:14 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301

tatoos and lady are inconsistent.


53 posted on 03/17/2006 7:54:26 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought
tatoos and lady are inconsistent.

Very true. The two are mutually exclusive.

54 posted on 03/17/2006 7:55:39 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

It must make it hard to eat soup without dribbling.


55 posted on 03/17/2006 7:58:58 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
They have to drop that rule if they ever institute a draft or everybody who wants to dodge will get ink.

Or smoke a joint.

56 posted on 03/17/2006 8:08:32 AM PST by flada (Posting in a manner reminiscent of Jen-gis Kahn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Tatoos on a lady are no different that dents on a brand new Mercedes.

I was looking at a tattooed lady the other day and I thought, I don't mind if she has tats, as long as she doesn't mind if I think of her as a sideshow freak, and not quite fully human. And NEVER as a lady.

57 posted on 03/17/2006 8:13:02 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

I always figure I've marked my body up plenty, quite by accident, and I don't need to start doing it intentionally.


58 posted on 03/17/2006 8:19:28 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: fso301

...dents on a brand new Mercedes.

**
Dirty dents


59 posted on 03/17/2006 8:20:14 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

If She Tattoos, She'll Do You!


60 posted on 03/17/2006 8:21:27 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson