Tune this baby up for a rendition of "Cry Me A River"
Posted on 03/17/2006 9:54:14 PM PST by LdSentinal
It’s the plight of so many American newspapers: declining circulation, flat or declining advertising revenues, rising newsprint costs. But it's a plight that seems to be hurting The Washington Post more.
The Post announced just a week ago that it would be eliminating some 80 newsroom positions over the next year. That’s close to 10 percent of its reporters and editors.
In some ways, the move isn’t really a surprise. Cuts and layoffs are increasingly common elsewhere. Not a week goes by that some paper somewhere in America isn't announcing yet another round of newsroom cuts.
What's significant is who’s making the cuts. The Post is one of America’s most celebrated newspapers, a Pulitzer Prize winner times over, and also among the best-managed. Which raises the question: If one of America top papers is suffering so, what does it say for the future of all the rest?
Post management is downplaying the staffing cuts, pointing out that they will come through attrition and buyouts, not layoffs. They also insist that the Post is in better shape financially than many papers. It's positioning the cuts as part of a larger plan that will actually improve overall news coverage.
But the paper’s publisher is candid about the financial realities.
"During the past year newspaper revenues have flattened while expenses--particularly newsprint--have continued to rise," Boisfeuillet Jones Jr. wrote in an internal memo to staff.
The Post will not reveal circulation and ad revenue figures to Media Life, but data available elsewhere paints an alarming picture. Ad revenue is up just slightly over the past five years, to $783.5 million last year from $770.6 million in 2000, according to TNS Media Intelligence.
But circulation has tumbled, falling by 137,695 for the weekday paper in the past decade, from 816,474 for the year ended Sept. 30, 1995 to 678,779 for the six-month period ended Oct. 2, 2005. That's a decline of 17 percent. That's according to numbers from the Audit Bureau of Circulations, the latter of which has not been audited yet and is based on publisher statements.
If the Post must struggle to hold onto readers, other papers must be in real trouble, or so it would seem.
Analyst John Morton says what the Post is experiencing is in some ways typical, the result of online publications taking a bigger bite out of print newspapers. He does not see that changing.
“Generally speaking, their circulation will continue to decline,” Morton said yesterday. “I don’t know that there’s any solution.”
What makes the Post unusual is that its circulation is sinking faster than that of many other newspapers around the country.
And there are several reasons for it. One is sheer size. With such a huge circulation, among the largest in the country, the Post's subscriber losses will be that much greater in total numbers.
Another, as Morton points out, is that the Post has enjoyed a deeper household penetration in its market. So as the city and the region change, as the ethnic mix shifts, the paper faces even greater challenges in maintaining those penetration levels.
Too, the Post faces increasing competition, and not just from the internet. It now competes against two other dailies, the Washington Times and now the Washington Examiner. There are then a whole slew of free papers and magazines.
“Big city newspapers are feeling it more because there are more choices in big cities,” says Morton. “There’s an awful lot of competition.”
It’s still unclear how much the new, free, Washington Examiner is cutting into the Post’s readership. But Morton says that anytime you get a new entry into the market it’s bound to increase the pressure.
Post management insists they will not cave into the pressures by compromising their high editorial standards, or allowing the overall quality of the paper to decline. But, if there’s a lesson in the Post’s woes, it’s that quality does not neccessarily hold the key to salvation.
It certainly doesn't hold the key to halting the Post’s declining circulation numbers.
So, how low could they eventually go? “I don’t have a clue,” Morton says. “And neither does anyone else.”
This is good news on this forum! Thanks for posting it. May the circulation and finances of the Washington Compost continue to decline at an accelerating rate.
In the words of Michael Jackson, "Tito, bring me a tissue."
I like 1-800-bite-me
The NYT.,Washington Post etc. are learning their lessons---the HARD way!!!
Tune this baby up for a rendition of "Cry Me A River"
Dang! I'm sssssoooo broken up. NOT!
Yes, but not a word in the article about the possibility of bias being a factor.
So....if a poll on President Bush is reported in the Washington Post.....does anyone read it? (Kinda like, if a tree falls in the forest, does anyone hear it.....)
Nah.....I don't think so.
I just LOVE reading the decline.......
Think they'll ever get a clue?
, as the ethnic mix shifts
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Translation: Those who can or can not read.
The old media is dead, long live the new media.
Thanks anyway. I prefer the Weekly Standard or the Wall St. Journal.
I know......
Try ZERO!!!....hehehehe....lol
sure couldn't have anything to do with content, could it ?
Say hello to Reason #4.
"But, if there’s a lesson in the Post’s woes, it’s that quality does not neccessarily hold the key to salvation."
Honesty and integrity you traitorous fools.....honesty and integrity!!!
Not a word about bias being a factor.
Does anyone have comparable information about the Washington Times. That information would help determine if the primary factor is the Post's liberal bias, vs. the general changes in the industry. They must really be hit hard by free advertising in Craigs List among other factors.
Maybe if the Post didn't support the Democrat agenda, some like me who live in the DC area might get a subscription.
Now some good news! Anyone who hasn't read the Washington Times should check it out.
Times circulation climbs to buck trend
http://www.washtimes.com/business/20050518-120247-7729r.htm
See my post #19. The Times total circulation is not a 10th of the Posts....but is growing.
Well then, I sincerely hope that the Post and the Pulitzer committee are very happy together.
The only value I see in the Post is that they are a pretty good "ear" into what the subversive socialists are up to.
You mean, for LIBERAL newspapers. Good riddance.
The Washington Post was founded in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins. That's 130 years of continuously screwed up news.
"it would be eliminating some 80 newsroom positions over the next year. That’s close to 10 percent of its reporters and editors."
80 down, 720 to go.
In fairness to the Post, I will point out that the paper prints Charles Krauthammer and George Will. I think it is a better paper than the NY Times, but these days that isn't saying much.
We're all so sad.
After its inexorably end, the Washington Post will be best remembered as an enemy of internet free speech and as a victim of that same new press.
"The Post announced just a week ago that it would be eliminating some 80 newsroom positions over the next year. That’s close to 10 percent of its reporters and editors."
Cue "The End" by The Doors.
Burn, baby, BURN.
We used to subscribe to the wash post while we were training our dogs.
The only newspaper worse that WP is the NYT.
At the same time the Wash.Post has lost 17 percent of its former corculation, I'd like to know what the circulation of the Wash. Times has been for the same time frame.
Times is a more conservative paper that used to be a joke but has become much more relevent.
Agenda driven "news" just isn't selling anymore.
Are folks getting smarter or is the old media just that bad?
Heh..
DINOSAUR MEDIA EXTINCTION ALERT!!
What about their healthcare? What about the children? /s
They still don't get it... "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"
If there is a true correction, it will be the big media equivalent of the Enron scandal.
The MSM better sleep lightly.
Ping to Grampa Dave - you know more about this than I do sir.
Too big.
It's true. The Times home delivery business is expanding. You can get 6 days a week for $30 a year. That's the precsription I have. People are getting sick of the Washington Compost.
Aarrghh... once again, not a mention of the other huge factor involved.
I'll say my spiel one more time:
I live in Westchester County, NY. My local newspaper is The Journal News, a very typical, ridiculously liberal DNC house organ.
I'm a 44-year-old white, middle/high-income consumer. I have a wife, and a daughter, who is in the local school system. I own a house, two cars, and am involved in local politics and activities. I am a voracious reader, and grew up with newspapers in the household every day of my life.
I am their perfect target customer.
I want very much to have my local newspaper delivered to my door every morning, if only for the local news, local sports, classifieds, etc. I would read all 4 sections daily, and peruse their advertising.
But I cannot because I REFUSE TO GIVE THEM ONE RED CENT FOR THEIR RELENTLESS BIAS AND HATRED FOR EVERYTHING CONSERVATIVE OR REPUBLICAN. PERIOD.
How these folks think they can succeed by repelling half their potential readership, I don't know...
As liberals decrease in number across the nation (due to abortion and low birthrates), liberal media outlets have fewer potential customers.
As conservatives grow in number (biological growth especially) conservative media outlets (think FoxNews, much of talk radio, conservative blogs and conservative newspapers will prosper.
There are simply more liberal media outlets than the market can bear, and they are dying. The nation will be better off without CBSNBCABCCNNMSNBC, the New York Slimes and Washington comPost.
Funny how the editorial page can drive down circulation and raise costs.
Fight to 'save the trees', and the cost of newsprint goes up.
Fight to save the red cockeaded woodpecker in southern forests and the cost of newsprint goes up.
Advocate for illegal aliens, (who can't read english) and circulation goes down.
Fight against accountability in the schools and the number of those able to read newspapers goes down.
Fight against school vouchers, more kids who can't read, circulation goes down.
To bad WaPo, you reap what you sow.
Mine plays "My heart pumps piss for the Washington Post".
They got rid of a all the conservatives years ago and have now gathered all the libs with conservative relatives just to be sure they're vetted thoroughly.
Look for outreach into the vast, illegal-alien diaspora and edgier 'journalism' that matches up better with The Daily Kos, DU and Democracy Now.
It'll hurt the blacks worst of all! /s
Like all liberals, there is no bottom.
Reason #4-----hello. Or should we say goodbye?
No one cares, period
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.