Skip to comments.
U.S. Navy Ships Return Fire on Suspected Pirates
www.news.navy.mil ^
| 3/18/2006 12:18:00 PM
| U.S. Naval Forces Central Command
Posted on 03/18/2006 11:21:12 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 last
To: A.A. Cunningham
To: K-oneTexas
"Unless Jimah Carter was president"
If Jimah was president, the pirates would have captured the US ships without a shot being fired.
102
posted on
03/18/2006 7:04:23 PM PST
by
RouxStir
(Mohammed is THE BOMB!)
To: Zeroisanumber
A crusier and a destroyer tool up to a 30' fishing boat and the crew of the fishing boat decide to open fire? What were they? High? If they were high, then they were chewing this stuff:
Qat...
103
posted on
03/18/2006 8:58:03 PM PST
by
demlosers
(Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
To: jonascord
"I suspect the only shooten' irons on board that can be optically aimed are a couple of rifles and the cook's paintball gun..."
Uh... no. Jimmy and Bill are out of office. You are right on the rifles but there are 50 calibers on many of our ships now.
However... I read somewhere the newer DDG's were designed without the Phalanx systems. The navy web sites don't list them either. I understand though that many are going to be retrofitted with them or an upgraded "replacement".
Seems like the designers all have that "missile" think that led to the original Phantoms without cannons. Stupid.
104
posted on
03/18/2006 10:15:08 PM PST
by
JSteff
To: JSteff
The F-4 Phantom was another of MacNamara's gifts to modern warfare. It was a "one size fits all" solution to an expanding defence budget, super-sonic for air superiority, for the Air Force, carrier qualified for the Navy, and ground attack truck for the Marines. like the M-16, the M-60 tank, and the M-113 Rolling Ronson. In other words, not good at any one thing, and piss-poor at all of them.
You will notice that older, more powerful weapons systems are being brought back from the bone yard when the "gee-whiz" systems fail in this new kind of war. I offer as evidence the "new" .45 pistol, the A-10 Hog, and the "new" larger caliber rifle in the works.
105
posted on
03/19/2006 1:30:53 AM PST
by
jonascord
("I'll say this for the long winded Jack-a-Napes. He does know the short way to start a war...")
To: A.A. Cunningham; Peach; Mo1
great pix at #60
ping article and interesting thread
106
posted on
03/19/2006 5:34:57 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Pretty much the result I expected LOL!!
To: Pan_Yan; Pan_Yans Wife
Here's a keyboard recovered from the wreckage:
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Did anybody stop to consider that these "pirates" were actually members of Al Qaeda?
In Richard Minitor's book, Shadow War, he writes about the war against Al Qaeda's navy at sea
When I think of pirates, I think of people trying to board ships in order to pillage them. It looks like these idiots just wanted to blow the ship up.
To: guinnessman
Oh yes, the Navy has interdicted al-Qaeda drug runners and terrorists at sea before. These meatheads seemed more interested in getting close enough to knock off a few sailors than anything else.
A lot of people are asking why they weren't just blown up on their boats, no survivors, and we're done. I think the Navy is going to have a nice long talk with these boys about who they work for, what they're doing there, and what their future plans are.
To: SSR1
"What where they thinking?"
Perhaps a diversion? Every amature magician (and military commander) knows to keep the audience looking at the left hand while the right hand palms the card.
111
posted on
03/19/2006 6:39:02 AM PST
by
joebuck
To: Echo Talon
Who says they can think!!!!!!!
112
posted on
03/19/2006 6:48:18 AM PST
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: yarddog
I sort of wondered about that same thing. How much damage could a few RPGs do to a destroyer. I am sure they could not sink it but I recall on the History Channel they said the metal on these ships is really thin. Not really armored at all.
RPG would punch through very well. All modern DDG and CG class use aluminum superstuructures to reduce above the waterline weight. Have to, with all the electronics they are loaded with. Only some of the critical areas get any armor.
To: ASA Vet
Actually, I don't. I know where it is having been there. But I do indeed want to thank you for lending assistance to those unfamiliar with the direction north.
On the other hand, if you don't think U.A.E. is north of Somalia, I have a tip for you.
Tip: You're holding your map (or PC) sideways or possibly upside down.
114
posted on
03/19/2006 2:36:31 PM PST
by
OESY
To: ozzymandus
What sort of light armament do US Navy ships carry? Depends on your definition of light, but all carry rifles, often M-14s, most carry .50 M-2, these carry the Mk-38/Bushmaster 25 mm cannon. I don't think we could cal the 5" gun a "small arm", but the old dudes off the Iowa class BBs probaby would. :) They are also armed with torpedoes, as well as their primary armament, the guided missiles.
115
posted on
03/22/2006 10:19:04 AM PST
by
El Gato
To: Spruce
Don't they have even a single 5-inch on the deck? That's exactly what they have, as can be seen in the picture of post 29 above.
116
posted on
03/22/2006 10:20:36 AM PST
by
El Gato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson