Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair to 'take on' Iraq critics
BBC News ^ | March 21, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 03/21/2006 5:57:29 AM PST by MadIvan

Britain's involvement in the invasion of Iraq is to be defended by the prime minister, in the first of three speeches on foreign policy.

Tony Blair is expected to say extremism in the world needs to be confronted and criticise those who argue otherwise.

He will restate his conviction that the UK faces threats and must prevent terrorism, not merely react to it.

The PM will tell an audience that foreign policy should be "strongly activist" and "justified by values".

The speech comes three years after bombs started falling on Baghdad at the start of the US-led campaign that resulted in the fall and eventual capture of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

'Superficial deal'

Mr Blair means to take on his foreign policy critics with his most strongly worded case for intervention overseas, BBC News diplomatic correspondent James Robbins says.

The prime minister will defend the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and will insist they are not distant entanglements but essential to Britain's future security.

His speech comes after the British deputy commander of all the multi-national forces in Iraq, General Sir Rob Fry, rejected claims that Iraq was in a state of civil war.

At the weekend, the former Iraqi interim prime minister, Iyad Allawi, claimed his country was in the grip of a civil conflict.

"I'd describe the situation as very difficult and I think we're in the middle of an intractable sectarian conflict but we're certainly not in civil war," said General Fry.

"I think if we were in civil war we'd see conflict with a level of intensity of a sustained nature and of a geographical spread much greater than it is now.

"I also don't think that we'd have the ring held by the major institutions of the state. The government is still intact and so are the armed forces."

Mr Blair is expected to criticise sections of the media he accuses of sitting back and arguing that stability in the world would be promoted by doing nothing.

He will accuse them of "a superficial deal with extremism" and say such behaviour must "be confronted and uprooted".

In another controversial statement, the prime minister will say religious extremism - including Islamist extremism - should be labelled as such.

US President George W Bush, meanwhile, has marked the anniversary of the start of the campaign in Iraq with an upbeat assessment of the country's prospects.

Iraqis in some areas still faced "savage" acts of violence, Mr Bush said, but he insisted that insurgents were being defeated in many places.

"The decision to remove Saddam Hussein was the right decision," he said in a speech in Cleveland, Ohio.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 3rdanniversary; blair; iraq; war
I don't agree with Blair on everything, but certainly I do on the need to take out Saddam.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 03/21/2006 5:57:31 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; agrace; EggsAckley; dinasour; ...


2 posted on 03/21/2006 5:58:03 AM PST by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side -
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Good for Blair!!

Pre-War "containment" of Saddam failed more and more, each day.

Did it ever occur to Cindy Sheehan, that her son Casey might still be alive, if the French and Germans hadn't been shirkers?

3 posted on 03/21/2006 6:02:09 AM PST by syriacus (Would fewer Americans have died in Iraq if the French and Germans had helped depose Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I hope he doesn't apologize for anything.

4 posted on 03/21/2006 6:19:45 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (UP: W.O.T. Tax Cuts Supreme Court Economy Morals DOWN: Borders/Illegals Spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Agreed. I don't agree with Tony about anything except Iraq, as far as I can tell.
5 posted on 03/21/2006 7:56:25 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Those who are confused about what a "civil war" is should look to events in the USA 1861-65. Now THAT was a civil war.

6 posted on 03/21/2006 9:05:55 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
He will accuse them of "a superficial deal with extremism"

As opposed to a superficial deal with a donor.
7 posted on 03/21/2006 4:20:12 PM PST by English Nationalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson