Posted on 03/22/2006 11:08:39 AM PST by CyberAnt
It seems the NSA terrorist surveillance program is not being mentioned at all.
I wonder if that's because the President actually called their bluff about it when he complained that if they think this is not a good program then they need to defund the program - but nobody is standing up to say that. I can't remember exactly what the President said - but it was strong statement: Either do something or get off the pot .. type of statement.
The media's lack of talk about those statements means THE PRESIDENT HIT THE TARGET!!!
"The Washington Post: "President Bush should hold more news conferences. ... In his sometimes blunt, sometimes joking and sometimes unpolished way, he sounded authentic"
Wow. Surely they put something nasty later in the article.
Surely! LOL!
But it is rather rude - "blunt", "unpolished" - in other words .. a dumb cowboy!
Seriously, your NSA point is dead on balls accurate.
>>>In his sometimes blunt, sometimes joking and sometimes unpolished way, he sounded authentic"
Sounded authentic? I think they got nasty already.
Something very few Democrats could ever be accused of.
I love it when I'm right! It happens so seldom .. LOL!!
"authentic"
Yeah, I love that comment too. Does that mean that the last 5 years Bush was "un-authentic" .. LOL!
[But it is rather rude - "blunt", "unpolished" - in other words .. a dumb cowboy!]
LOL...Not near as much as some in the White House Press Corps.
I think he said something to the effect that if they are so convinced that the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) is so bad, so unnecessary, an so violative, then they should campaign on that. Tell the people that you don't want a TSP. Tell them we shouldn't have a TSP. Tell them you will not support a TSP.
In fact, he said they should speak up now and say it, that's why they're in Washington.
It was 'in your face and right up you a$$' brilliant!
" Today during a Press Conference, the President 'mooed' at me and called me the 'ugliest water buffalo ever to step foot in the White House.' " -- Helen Tomas
I'd love for him to hold pressers and Q&A's in PRIME time.
Live audience, (even the WH press midgets) are his best arena.
LOL...And rightly so!
I was so glad to hear those words about the NSA thing. It gets kind of depressing to hear every other week about the next Democrat attempt to find a way to impeach Bush. The media is either never catching on or (more likely) in on the whole thing and breathlessly reports each new attempt as if none of the others occurred.
They also know these are free and open questions because several of them have bordered on hostile and yet he answered them fully and completely.
Thanks for posting this.
Make sure you save this. They forget so soon, you know.
You're right and after he handled their hostility yesterday "with EASE" they have taken a step back to rearm.
They're poll watchers, are they know Americans hate them and see their bias, but they;re driven by their personal hatred of POTUS and their employers agenda.
Most think they're smarter than POTUS, even after he's bested them everytime. Misunderestimated and statergery.
I wonder if that's because the President actually called their bluff about it when he complained that if they think this is not a good program then they need to defund the program - but nobody is standing up to say that. I can't remember exactly what the President said - but it was strong statement: Either do something or get off the pot .. type of statement. The media's lack of talk about those statements means THE PRESIDENT HIT THE TARGET!!!
Here is W's direct quote, in answer to FOX News' Carl Cameron:
THE PRESIDENT: I think during these difficult times -- and they are difficult when we're at war -- the American people expect there to be a honest and open debate without needless partisanship. And that's how I view it. I did notice that nobody from the Democrat Party has actually stood up and called for getting rid of the terrorist surveillance program. You know, if that's what they believe, if people in the party believe that, then they ought to stand up and say it. They ought to stand up and say the tools we're using to protect the American people shouldn't be used. They ought to take their message to the people and say, vote for me, I promise we're not going to have a terrorist surveillance program. That's what they ought to be doing. That's part of what is an open and honest debate.
I did notice that, at one point in time, they didn't think the Patriot Act ought to be reauthorized -- "they" being at least the Minority Leader in the Senate. He openly said, as I understand -- I don't want to misquote him -- something along the lines that, "We killed the Patriot Act." And if that's what the party believes, they ought to go around the country saying we shouldn't give the people on the front line of protecting us the tools necessary to do so. That's a debate I think the country ought to have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.