Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former NY Times Reporter: '93 Pulitzer Should Be Revoked
CNSNews.com ^ | March 22, 2006 | Sherrie Gossett

Posted on 03/22/2006 1:25:23 PM PST by montyspython

Former NY Times Reporter: '93 Pulitzer Should Be Revoked
By Sherrie Gossett
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
March 22, 2006

Washington (CNSNews.com) - Castigating the press for "journalistic crimes" committed during its reporting on the Balkans wars of the 1990s, retired New York Times reporter David Binder claims the 1993 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting awarded to both the Times and New York's Newsday "should, in all fairness and honesty, be revoked."

Binder was speaking at a press conference for the release of a new book criticizing the war reporting. Binder wrote the foreword to the book by Peter Brock, titled "Media Cleansing: Dirty Reporting, Journalism and Tragedy in Yugoslavia."

"What we're looking at here is a series catalogued by Peter Brock of journalistic crimes," said Binder. Before mentioning the reporting of the Times' John F. Burns and Newsday's Roy Gutman, Binder evoked the memory of what he called Walter Duranty's "phony reporting" for the New York Times in the 1930s as an example of an undeserved Pulitzer. Duranty was criticized for having been too deferential to Joseph Stalin and his plan to industrialize the Soviet Union.

"What Peter [Brock] has unraveled and disclosed in this book involves at least a couple of Pulitzer prizes that should in all fairness and honesty be revoked." Binder confirmed to Cybercast News Service that he was referring to the 1993 Pulitzer Prize for international reporting, awarded to Burns of the New York Times and Gutman of Newsday for their reporting in the Balkans. Brock devotes considerable space in his book to criticizing the reporting of Burns and Gutman.

Binder noted that the Times has gone through "agony" in recent years over the "terrible professional behavior of its staff members" and with "what has gone on under its masthead."

"[E]xposure is the best remedy," said Binder.

"I think Peter Brock's book helps a great deal to confront these egregious crimes of journalism. I think it should be shoved under the noses of editors all across the press, at least the editors who are dealing with foreign news ..." said Binder.

The Pulitzer Board at first voted to award the prize solely to Gutman, according to Binder. "The New York Times got so agitated that John Burns was passed over that they started lobbying the board. The Pulitzer is an extremely political award in many if not all cases. There are all kinds of backstage manipulations that go on."

The centerpiece of Burns' Pulitzer entry was a seven-hour interview with a captured Bosnian Serb -- Borislav Herak -- who in graphic statements to Burns, confessed to dozens of murders, including eight involving rape. Burns' Nov. 27, 1992, article was described by the New York Times as offering "insight into the way thousands of others have died in Bosnia."

However, more than three years after the publication of Burns' story, the Times on Jan. 31, 1996, described Herak as "slightly retarded" and reported that Herak had retracted his confession and claimed it had been beaten out of him by guards.

"I was tortured, forced to confess," said Herak. By that time his testimony already had been used to convict Sretko Damjanovic for the killing of two Muslim brothers who were later found alive. Both Herak and Damjanovic, who also said he had been "tortured" into providing a false confession, were sentenced to death by firing squad.

Author Peter Brock described Burns' interview with Herak as "a manipulated confession and interrogation in which Burns was the key participant." Brock faults Burns for failing to tell readers that the interview took place with a Sarajevo video production crew present and that "interrogations were conducted by [government] investigators and by Sarajevo film director Ademir Kenovic."

He also argues that "vital pieces" of Herak's story were missing. "[T]here was no evidence, corpses or victims, or eyewitnesses to implicate Herak, except for hearsay from Bosnian government 'investigators,'" Brock writes.

Brock also faults Newsday's Roy Gutman for being unduly influenced by government propagandists including one source who operated under four different aliases. Gutman was criticized for not exercising enough scrutiny before repeating allegations of atrocities and statistics of the dead and tortured.

Gutman won his Pulitzer partly for "electrifying stories about 'concentration camps'," notes Brock, who criticizes the reporter for the prominence of "hearsay" and "double hearsay" in his stories, as well as gratuitous use of the language of the Nazi Holocaust.

Gutman's first five stories about the alleged Omarska concentration camp in Bosnia were actually filed from Zagreb, in Croatia, Brock complains. It was Gutman's sixth story on the subject that finally carried an Omarska dateline, Brock wrote, and that was after the prison had been shut down.

Both Binder and Brock accuse the press of falling into "pack journalism" and playing the role of "co-belligerent." The reliance on Croat and Bosnian Muslim propaganda resulted in distorted reporting that exaggerated the Serb role in the three-sided conflict and ignored ethnic cleansing of Serbs, according to Binder and Brock.

Brock went so far as to say the $3,000 Pulitzer Prize money awarded to Burns and Gutman was "blood money."

"What we're talking about in terms of what I call crimes of journalism was only ten years ago," said Binder. "It wasn't so long ago that these, I think revolting things, were happening -- revolting bias, revolting suppression of other sides of the story."

During his recent appearance at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Binder said it would take "at least a decade" before historians "clear out that wretched underbrush of lies and concoctions" from "despicable" politicians "like Richard Holbrooke," an international negotiator during the administration of former President Bill Clinton and "certainly the journalists" criticized in Brock's book. The rise of blogs and media watchdog groups offers a "corrective" for the public now, Binder contended.

In his call for the revocation of the Pulitzer Prize Peter Brock said that "in all fairness, if [the Pulitzer board] is not going to revoke the prize, they ought to give Janet Cooke's Pulitzer back." Cooke was a Washington Post reporter who won a Pulitzer for a fabricated 1980 story about an eight-year old heroin addict.

As of Wednesday afternoon, there had been no reaction from either the New York Times or Newsday to Cybercast News Service's several requests for comment related to this article.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: antichristian; balkans; bosnia; clintonlegacy; clintonsquagmire; duranty; enemedia; islamofascists; jihad; lies; newyorktimes; propoganda; pulitzer; revisionism; serbia; truth; wrongplace; wrongside; wrongtime; wrongwar; yugoslavia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: OldFriend

This was more about betraying our wartime allies, the Serbs, so that Clinton could have the US service the radical Muslims in the same manner that he had underlings service him.


21 posted on 03/22/2006 2:05:58 PM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

I agree with you completely. Even tho my son was in the military during that time and had we not begun dropping bombs on Serbia, he would have been in country as a peacekeeper. Far more dangerous than dropping bombs from 30,000 feet......he was totally against X42's position in this matter.


22 posted on 03/22/2006 2:09:20 PM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

We seem to keep repeating ourselves in the participation historical blunders.


23 posted on 03/22/2006 2:09:33 PM PST by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

bttt


24 posted on 03/22/2006 2:10:51 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces
At their demise, I wonder if the NY Slimes will publish their own obit in the last issue?
25 posted on 03/22/2006 2:42:28 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis


If not them...the post will surely be glad to do it.


26 posted on 03/22/2006 2:47:23 PM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

The entrance into the Balkans was the worse decision. The Balkans was a well constructed Hoax, exaggerated crime to justify the invasion/bombing by International forces.

Kosovo, was also a prime example of the hoax.


27 posted on 03/22/2006 2:56:08 PM PST by tgambill (I would like to comment.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

That is the main point.....The book is very good read.


28 posted on 03/22/2006 2:57:40 PM PST by tgambill (I would like to comment.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...

29 posted on 03/22/2006 3:25:33 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montyspython; Howlin; neverdem; Congressman Billybob
But, but, but ....

This was the story, the format, the words and propaganda that HILLARY WANTED!

She set up the story, immediately after impeachment and after a one-week, closed door, secret White-House/mainstream press corpse "retreat" in early February ....

How could Hillary "possibly" get any thing wrong?????
30 posted on 03/22/2006 4:02:50 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
She set up the story, immediately after impeachment and after a one-week, closed door, secret White-House/mainstream press corpse "retreat" in early February ....

Tell me more, please, sir.

31 posted on 03/22/2006 4:11:36 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Proctor; Alouette; SJackson

PING


32 posted on 03/22/2006 6:21:37 PM PST by Lion in Winter (The older I am the more I want people to wake up and smell the coffee 'bout violent religions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; doug from upland; Dustbunny

ping


33 posted on 03/22/2006 6:22:34 PM PST by Lion in Winter (The older I am the more I want people to wake up and smell the coffee 'bout violent religions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; happyathome

PING .... FYI


34 posted on 03/22/2006 6:23:22 PM PST by Lion in Winter (The older I am the more I want people to wake up and smell the coffee 'bout violent religions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infidel_and_proud

PING... fyi


35 posted on 03/22/2006 6:24:28 PM PST by Lion in Winter (The older I am the more I want people to wake up and smell the coffee 'bout violent religions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj

PING and FYI...


36 posted on 03/22/2006 6:44:18 PM PST by Lion in Winter (The older I am the more I want people to wake up and smell the coffee 'bout violent religions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

FYI


37 posted on 03/22/2006 6:55:53 PM PST by Lion in Winter (The older I am the more I want people to wake up and smell the coffee 'bout violent religions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Don't feel that way, after all, we never met before!
I didn't notice pubish and until you pointed it out (and I copied it) - so who needs to rest up. LOL


38 posted on 03/22/2006 7:21:23 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
their own obit

They are on life support now - finding ways to stay alive.
39 posted on 03/22/2006 7:30:43 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl

We're still waiting for them to revoke Walter Duranty's pulitzer


40 posted on 03/22/2006 7:32:05 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson