Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former NY Times Reporter: '93 Pulitzer Should Be Revoked
CNSNews.com ^ | March 22, 2006 | Sherrie Gossett

Posted on 03/22/2006 1:25:23 PM PST by montyspython

Former NY Times Reporter: '93 Pulitzer Should Be Revoked
By Sherrie Gossett
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
March 22, 2006

Washington (CNSNews.com) - Castigating the press for "journalistic crimes" committed during its reporting on the Balkans wars of the 1990s, retired New York Times reporter David Binder claims the 1993 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting awarded to both the Times and New York's Newsday "should, in all fairness and honesty, be revoked."

Binder was speaking at a press conference for the release of a new book criticizing the war reporting. Binder wrote the foreword to the book by Peter Brock, titled "Media Cleansing: Dirty Reporting, Journalism and Tragedy in Yugoslavia."

"What we're looking at here is a series catalogued by Peter Brock of journalistic crimes," said Binder. Before mentioning the reporting of the Times' John F. Burns and Newsday's Roy Gutman, Binder evoked the memory of what he called Walter Duranty's "phony reporting" for the New York Times in the 1930s as an example of an undeserved Pulitzer. Duranty was criticized for having been too deferential to Joseph Stalin and his plan to industrialize the Soviet Union.

"What Peter [Brock] has unraveled and disclosed in this book involves at least a couple of Pulitzer prizes that should in all fairness and honesty be revoked." Binder confirmed to Cybercast News Service that he was referring to the 1993 Pulitzer Prize for international reporting, awarded to Burns of the New York Times and Gutman of Newsday for their reporting in the Balkans. Brock devotes considerable space in his book to criticizing the reporting of Burns and Gutman.

Binder noted that the Times has gone through "agony" in recent years over the "terrible professional behavior of its staff members" and with "what has gone on under its masthead."

"[E]xposure is the best remedy," said Binder.

"I think Peter Brock's book helps a great deal to confront these egregious crimes of journalism. I think it should be shoved under the noses of editors all across the press, at least the editors who are dealing with foreign news ..." said Binder.

The Pulitzer Board at first voted to award the prize solely to Gutman, according to Binder. "The New York Times got so agitated that John Burns was passed over that they started lobbying the board. The Pulitzer is an extremely political award in many if not all cases. There are all kinds of backstage manipulations that go on."

The centerpiece of Burns' Pulitzer entry was a seven-hour interview with a captured Bosnian Serb -- Borislav Herak -- who in graphic statements to Burns, confessed to dozens of murders, including eight involving rape. Burns' Nov. 27, 1992, article was described by the New York Times as offering "insight into the way thousands of others have died in Bosnia."

However, more than three years after the publication of Burns' story, the Times on Jan. 31, 1996, described Herak as "slightly retarded" and reported that Herak had retracted his confession and claimed it had been beaten out of him by guards.

"I was tortured, forced to confess," said Herak. By that time his testimony already had been used to convict Sretko Damjanovic for the killing of two Muslim brothers who were later found alive. Both Herak and Damjanovic, who also said he had been "tortured" into providing a false confession, were sentenced to death by firing squad.

Author Peter Brock described Burns' interview with Herak as "a manipulated confession and interrogation in which Burns was the key participant." Brock faults Burns for failing to tell readers that the interview took place with a Sarajevo video production crew present and that "interrogations were conducted by [government] investigators and by Sarajevo film director Ademir Kenovic."

He also argues that "vital pieces" of Herak's story were missing. "[T]here was no evidence, corpses or victims, or eyewitnesses to implicate Herak, except for hearsay from Bosnian government 'investigators,'" Brock writes.

Brock also faults Newsday's Roy Gutman for being unduly influenced by government propagandists including one source who operated under four different aliases. Gutman was criticized for not exercising enough scrutiny before repeating allegations of atrocities and statistics of the dead and tortured.

Gutman won his Pulitzer partly for "electrifying stories about 'concentration camps'," notes Brock, who criticizes the reporter for the prominence of "hearsay" and "double hearsay" in his stories, as well as gratuitous use of the language of the Nazi Holocaust.

Gutman's first five stories about the alleged Omarska concentration camp in Bosnia were actually filed from Zagreb, in Croatia, Brock complains. It was Gutman's sixth story on the subject that finally carried an Omarska dateline, Brock wrote, and that was after the prison had been shut down.

Both Binder and Brock accuse the press of falling into "pack journalism" and playing the role of "co-belligerent." The reliance on Croat and Bosnian Muslim propaganda resulted in distorted reporting that exaggerated the Serb role in the three-sided conflict and ignored ethnic cleansing of Serbs, according to Binder and Brock.

Brock went so far as to say the $3,000 Pulitzer Prize money awarded to Burns and Gutman was "blood money."

"What we're talking about in terms of what I call crimes of journalism was only ten years ago," said Binder. "It wasn't so long ago that these, I think revolting things, were happening -- revolting bias, revolting suppression of other sides of the story."

During his recent appearance at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Binder said it would take "at least a decade" before historians "clear out that wretched underbrush of lies and concoctions" from "despicable" politicians "like Richard Holbrooke," an international negotiator during the administration of former President Bill Clinton and "certainly the journalists" criticized in Brock's book. The rise of blogs and media watchdog groups offers a "corrective" for the public now, Binder contended.

In his call for the revocation of the Pulitzer Prize Peter Brock said that "in all fairness, if [the Pulitzer board] is not going to revoke the prize, they ought to give Janet Cooke's Pulitzer back." Cooke was a Washington Post reporter who won a Pulitzer for a fabricated 1980 story about an eight-year old heroin addict.

As of Wednesday afternoon, there had been no reaction from either the New York Times or Newsday to Cybercast News Service's several requests for comment related to this article.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: antichristian; balkans; bosnia; clintonlegacy; clintonsquagmire; duranty; enemedia; islamofascists; jihad; lies; newyorktimes; propoganda; pulitzer; revisionism; serbia; truth; wrongplace; wrongside; wrongtime; wrongwar; yugoslavia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
We already know to what lengths the NYT will go for a story, including instigating the deaths of innocent people
1 posted on 03/22/2006 1:25:26 PM PST by montyspython
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tgambill; ma bell; DTA; Banat; F-117A; kronos77; FormerLib; Lion in Winter; Wraith; wonders

bump to all those interested


2 posted on 03/22/2006 1:27:08 PM PST by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montyspython
Duranty was criticized for having been too deferential to Joseph Stalin and his plan to industrialize the Soviet Union.

I suppose that is one way to put it. But as I recall, Duranty was more than just "deferential" toward Stalin; he covered up Stalin's many crimes, including the mass murder by starvation of millions of Ukrainians.

3 posted on 03/22/2006 1:29:41 PM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

They haven't revoked Walter Duranty's for out-and-out lying about Stalin's Paradise so I doubt this will get very far.


4 posted on 03/22/2006 1:35:04 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montyspython
We already know to what lengths the NYT will go for a story, including instigating the deaths of innocent people

But I'll bet they won't pubish this one!

5 posted on 03/22/2006 1:37:54 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
As the article eluded to, the Pulitzer Prize is an exercise in political pandering.
6 posted on 03/22/2006 1:38:47 PM PST by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

pubish=publish (proofread, AQ!)


7 posted on 03/22/2006 1:38:50 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
But I'll bet they won't pubish this one!


You're right, cause they don't publish truth.
8 posted on 03/22/2006 1:41:13 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montyspython


Well, the NYT, is killing itself with it blatant biased and editoralized/agendized reporting...surely, someone will post the chart showing NYT's stock price slamming straight down towards the toiled...exactly where this bird cage liner of a paper belongs...


9 posted on 03/22/2006 1:42:03 PM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Welcome to Free Republic.


10 posted on 03/22/2006 1:42:24 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

I can't help but draw parallels between the ethnic Albanians of the 90s and what the future holds in store for La Raza and the Norte Americanos who will be playing the part of the Serbs in some future court.


11 posted on 03/22/2006 1:42:53 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

"Pubish" rhymes with "rubbish..."


12 posted on 03/22/2006 1:44:06 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Welcome to Free Republic.

Ok, that's it. Now I'm welcoming someone who's been here for a year. I'd better stop posting until I've rested up!

13 posted on 03/22/2006 1:44:22 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

You mean it's not 2004 anymore? ;^)


14 posted on 03/22/2006 1:47:33 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

"as well as gratuitous use of the language of the Nazi Holocaust."

Um, like the Serbs talking about "ethnic cleansing?"


15 posted on 03/22/2006 1:52:10 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

The Pulitzer and the Nobel are what they are.....rewards for bashing America.


16 posted on 03/22/2006 1:54:26 PM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Come agian?


17 posted on 03/22/2006 2:00:05 PM PST by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: zagor-te-nej; Lion in Winter; Honorary Serb; jb6; Incorrigible; DTA; ma bell; joan; vooch; ...

The truth will out!


18 posted on 03/22/2006 2:02:04 PM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Perhaps we'll finally get the truth about the Serbs being ethnically cleansed. Certainly aren't many left in the Krajina or Kosovo.
19 posted on 03/22/2006 2:03:16 PM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: montyspython
Serbia, the most egregiously bad military and geopolical decision of the 20th century.
Subsequent events just reinforce the reality.
20 posted on 03/22/2006 2:04:42 PM PST by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson