Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cannoneer No. 4
I don't understand why so many here are resistant to our dumping the hummer in favor of another vehicle like the RG-31 (which I always thought was the Buffalo, but I guess not-they are South African made though, right?).

There is no good reason why we have to stay with a vehicle that doesn't do the job as well as an alternative. All of our vehicles should come with at least some steel plating and ballistic glass. Why is that reasoning defective? War requires adaptation and we shouldn't be so wedded to doctrine that it hurts us.

I don't care what the hummer was "intended" for, it is vulnerable in the mission that it has. Other vehicles can carry out the same mission that the hummer has doctrinally and are less vulnerable in other capacities. Every day soldiers roll out the gate more vulnerable than they should be, but many on this thread seem not to care so much about that as they do about retaining our hummer fleet (WTF?!?)

87 posted on 03/24/2006 7:10:22 AM PST by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: 91B
RG-31 started out in South Africa. The Rhodesians created a lot of home-made mine resistant vehicles in the '70's and the South Africans used those ideas in the '80's and now they are the leaders in mine resistant vehicles.

This is a Buffalo, made in South Carolina.

88 posted on 03/24/2006 7:53:17 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson