Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In which of the following countries are certain types of political free speech a crime?
The American Conservative Union ^ | J. William Lauderback, Executive Vice President

Posted on 03/24/2006 12:30:09 AM PST by Jim Robinson


In which of the following countries are certain types of political free speech a crime?

A) China
B) The United States

The answer may shock you -- because if you answered both "A" and "B," you're very close to being correct!

(And you could be 100% correct in a matter of days!)

Here's what happened:

In 2002, the Senate and House passed what is known as "McCain-Feingold"  -- a constitutionally questionable law that severely restricts the ability of ACU (and other not-for-profit organizations) to give YOU non-partisan information on candidates for federal public office prior to an election.

McCain-Feingold essentially regulates -- almost to the point of impossibility -- political "advertising" 60 days prior to a federal election that appears on "any broadcast, cable or satellite communication, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, mass mailing or telephone bank to the general public, or any other form of general public political advertising."

However, when McCain and Feingold initially proposed this legislation, they could not foresee the massive power and influence that average citizens would eventually come to wield through the Internet and for that reason --"McCain-Feingold" did not explicitly mention communications over the Internet.

So McCain, Feingold, and others of their mindset  – when they realized they had overlooked the Internet in their efforts to regulate political speech -- went to court.

And -- big surprise -- a  U.S. District Court Judge (Colleen Kollar-Kotelly) appointed by Bill Clinton, ruled that Internet communications were also covered under "McCain-Feingold!"

Fortunately, the House of Representatives has put forth the Online Freedom of Speech Act (H.R. 1606) and a companion bill (S. 678) is under consideration in the Senate.

Both are designed specifically to exempt the Internet from the draconian "McCain-Feingold Act."

But we have to ACT NOW because a vote on H.R. 1606 -- to preserve free speech on the Internet -- may come any day now

And the vote may be very close!
 

Use the hyperlink below to send your URGENT Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush, the leadership of the United States Senate and the leadership of the United States House of Representatives.

Tell them that you are outraged that a federal judge up-held McCain-Feingold and has taken away your freedom to speak out on the Internet.

 Demand that they reaffirm the First Amendment by voting “yes” on H.R. 1606 and S. 678.

http://www.acuactionnet.net/hr1606.html

AOL Members Use This Hyperlink

If the above hyperlink does not function, please copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser.

 

H.R. 1606 Affects You Too

I wonder what some of our elected officials think our Founding Fathers meant when they wrote: “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech….”

Because it would appear they want to abridge it and abridge it and abridge it again – until people like you and me are bound and gagged and helpless.

Addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference in February this year, conservative thinker and columnist George Will said, And we are right now well into the most concerted and most dangerous attack on freedom of expression in this country since the Alien and Sedition Acts, which themselves were unsettled and therefore not designed to be permanent as the McCain-Feingold regimen of speech-rationing by the federal government is.”

Let's read what "McCain Feingold" says one more time and add the "Internet" to the legislation as McCain and Feingold intended:

"ANY [Emphasis Mine] broadcast, cable or satellite communication, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, mass mailing or telephone bank [or Internet transmission] to the general public, or any other form of general public political advertising."

Think of the implications:

Do you post a lot of opinions in forums or bulletin boards?

Do you frequently pontificate or express opinions in Internet chat rooms?

Do you maintain a blog that is available to the general public?

If any of these situations applies to you -- then guess what --  "McCain-Feingold" may apply to you too!

 

Use the hyperlink below to send your URGENT Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush, the leadership of the United States Senate and the leadership of the United States House of Representatives.

Tell them that you are outraged that a federal judge up-held McCain-Feingold and has taken away your freedom to speak out on the Internet.

 Demand that they reaffirm the First Amendment by voting “yes” on H.R. 1606 and S. 678.

http://www.acuactionnet.net/hr1606.html

AOL Members Use This Hyperlink

If the above hyperlink does not function, please copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser.

 

Do You Remember Rather-Gate?

Why is the Left so rabid, so hysterical in its opposition to H.R. 1606?

The answer should be obvious:

They weep for the good old days when the only major sources of news were ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and newspapers like the New York Times.

They can’t get rid of Rush and Fox News, but they can still crush the political websites. Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly has made that a tantalizing possibility.

But they can beat down H.R. 1606 and when that happens, ACU and other activist websites (and possibly even your blog) will be effectively silenced – their mouths stuffed with reams of government regulations and miles and miles of red tape.

Or to put it another way:

We all remember what happened just before the 2004 presidential election.  Dan Rather and some producers at CBS -- in a blatant attempt to influence the outcome of the election -- published a FRAUDULENT story about President Bush's National Guard service.

Fortunately, bloggers (private citizens) were able to spread the truth and expose the fraud behind this story!

Would that have happened if "McCain-Feingold" applied to the Internet?

That's a good question!

And maybe that's why the New York Times came out AGAINST H.R. 1606; claiming that allowing free speech to go unregulated on the Internet would cause "a cornucopia of political corruption."  

 

Use the hyperlink below to send your URGENT Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush, the leadership of the United States Senate and the leadership of the United States House of Representatives.

Tell them that you are outraged that a federal judge up-held McCain-Feingold and has taken away your freedom to speak out on the Internet.

 Demand that they reaffirm the First Amendment by voting “yes” on H.R. 1606 and S. 678.

http://www.acuactionnet.net/hr1606.html

AOL Members Use This Hyperlink

If the above hyperlink does not function, please copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser.


 

The Internet Is A Powerful Weapon

Don’t think that John McCain and his liberal cronies aren’t aware of the power of the Internet.  They know you are making a difference in Washington. 

Every time you jam their fax machines and shine the light of day on their plots, they are reminded of the power that you -- as average citizens -- are wielding.

And they don't always like it.  In fact, some actually fear it.  The power of the average citizens threatens their incumbency... it threatens the back-room deals they make with special interests... in essence, it threatens business as usual in Washington.

The Internet is the last vestige of free and effective political speech in America. It's what’s left of the Voice of the People.

Let's keep it that way!

Don’t let Congress take away your First Amendment rights!

And please ACT NOW -- because a vote -- to preserve free speech on the Internet -- may come any day!
 

Use the hyperlink below to send your URGENT Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush, the leadership of the United States Senate and the leadership of the United States House of Representatives.

Tell them that you are outraged that a federal judge up-held McCain-Feingold and has taken away your freedom to speak out on the Internet.

 Demand that they reaffirm the First Amendment by voting “yes” on H.R. 1606 and S. 678.

http://www.acuactionnet.net/hr1606.html

AOL Members Use This Hyperlink

If the above hyperlink does not function, please copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser.

 

J. William Lauderback
Executive Vice President
American Conservative Union

 

AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION
     1007 Cameron Street | Alexandria, VA 22314 | 703-836-8602 | Fax 703-836-8606

Powered By GrassTopsUSA

 

 


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; abuseofpower; bloggers; calltoaction; cfr; congress; corruption; elections; fec; freespeech; mccain; mccainfeingold; rally; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: jan in Colorado; Dark Skies; Former Dodger; expatguy; AmericanArchConservative; Cornpone; ...

PING.


21 posted on 03/24/2006 2:01:59 AM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

bump!


22 posted on 03/24/2006 2:41:01 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
How convenient Washington abridges the rights of Americans to free speech but can't find the balls to regulate the 14th to stop anchor baby attractions to illegal aliens.

For such grievance was the first revolution's beginnings, and we now have no means of redress.

I honestly can't fathom who the heck some of those in DC think they represent.

23 posted on 03/24/2006 2:58:16 AM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

BTT


24 posted on 03/24/2006 3:00:48 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

BTTT


25 posted on 03/24/2006 3:01:02 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"This is the state of the modern regulatory state."

If you've ever been to China, you'd see the amazing similarities between our leaders' perceptions of the "governed".

26 posted on 03/24/2006 3:02:31 AM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Is advertising equals informing ?

Would it be unlawful to express your feelings and opinions about political parties or candidates ?

Or is it 'campaigning' that is outlawed by this ?

If so, how is it possible to draw the line between uttering an opinion and campaigning ?


27 posted on 03/24/2006 3:22:56 AM PST by globalheater (There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare - Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

'learning from communism is learning to win'


28 posted on 03/24/2006 3:24:11 AM PST by globalheater (There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare - Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: globalheater

Some of our leaders appear to be striving hard to mimick them.


29 posted on 03/24/2006 3:28:56 AM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Mega Bump!


30 posted on 03/24/2006 4:34:32 AM PST by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; Gamecock; Jean Chauvin; OrthodoxPresbyterian; CCWoody; Wrigley; jboot; AZhardliner; ...

PATRIOTS,
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT!
PLEASE READ THIS AND ANY POSTS FROM J.R. IN THE LAST 48 HOURS.PING ANY OTHER FREEPERS AND I APPOLOGIZE FOR ANY DOUBLE PINGS.
GODSPEED!


31 posted on 03/24/2006 5:21:19 AM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Willie Green; Mo1; ..

Not Pa. directly but it's important to know


32 posted on 03/24/2006 5:36:38 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; ohioWfan; DrDeb; GretchenM; Wolfstar; Mo1; Peach; Txsleuth; NordP; mystery-ak; ...

Bump!


33 posted on 03/24/2006 5:55:20 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: USF

Thanks for the ping.


34 posted on 03/24/2006 6:41:40 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Scary stuff. I love GWB, but I greatly lament the fact that he signed McCain-Feingold.

Thanks for the heads-up. Will make contact.


35 posted on 03/24/2006 6:49:14 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Done!


36 posted on 03/24/2006 6:55:23 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

free speech ping


37 posted on 03/24/2006 6:57:47 AM PST by Buffettfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If, as we knew at the time, McCain-Feinfgold was an affront to the first amendment, then why did GWB sign it? After the Democrats win in November (just a guess, a sleepless one at that) will he whip out his pen and sign a newer version of the "fairness doctrine" into law?

For all he has done that is positive, for all of the "feel good" times he gave us, when he signed the CFR bill into law all changed for me. It validated my belief that he is an elitist first and that he believes that the government is not formed at the consent of the governed.

I will contact my Senator(s) and advise them of the right thing to do. It is just too bad it had to come to this.
38 posted on 03/24/2006 7:16:50 AM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02

Thank you so much!!


39 posted on 03/24/2006 7:49:19 AM PST by MarMema (Buy Danish, support freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BTTT


40 posted on 03/24/2006 8:51:53 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson