Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maine-iac7; Sabramerican
"will criminalize"? - or will hold to account for breaking the law and leaking classified info? Isn't it already a crime?

For government employees. Or transmitting or possessing documents, even in your socks. Transmitting verbal information for non-employees, perhaps, this prosecution will determine that. My only point is that if it's criminal, it needs to be prosecuted uniformly. That's never been the case, perhaps it will in the future. Look to seeing indictments of many in both the media and government. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing, but it's going to be quite a circus because it will change the way our nation operates.

17 posted on 03/26/2006 11:12:17 AM PST by SJackson ([Iraq] Reconstruction isnít news is it? Chris Matthews)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

Usually the gov't is more interested in the original leaker. It's hard to make the case that the middleman is a threat to national security and an even harder case for the newspapers because if the WaPo won't publish it, they'll shop it to the NYT and so on.

But thanks to Fitz, these guys won't be able to argue selective enforcement.


19 posted on 03/26/2006 11:28:43 AM PST by AmishDude (Amishdude, servant of the dark lord Xenu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson