Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Novak: Karl Rove Supreme
Creator's Syndicate ^ | March 30, 2006 | Robert Novak

Posted on 03/29/2006 10:28:14 PM PST by RWR8189

WASHINGTON -- Everybody in Washington's Republican political community was well aware that any changes George W. Bush made in his White House staff would not constitute a shake-up. What nobody expected was that Josh Bolten, in essence a professional bureaucrat, would be promoted to chief of staff. Yet, this selection becomes understandable as a confirmation of Karl Rove's supremacy in the White House.

Rove holds the mundane titles of senior adviser to the president and deputy chief of staff, but scarcely anything happens in the Bush administration without his approval. Now he is more influential than ever. Andrew Card, the departing chief of staff, served (as a Cabinet member) under the senior President Bush (as Rove did not). In contrast, Bolten can thank his rise in the second Bush regime to Rove, his nominal subordinate.

I talked to former White House staffers who served Republican presidents over the last quarter of a century. To a man, they were appalled that President Bush had squandered the opportunity handed him when a burned-out Card told him he must resign. It was the time, they agreed, to emulate what President Ronald Reagan did in 1987 when his national approval rating dropped below 40 percent and he brought a new team to the White House: Howard Baker, Kenneth Duberstein, Frank Carlucci and Colin Powell. By not emulating Reagan's boldness, Bush failed to address the unhappy state of his administration and his party.

Throughout his governmental career in Washington and Sacramento, Reagan never was hesitant to drop overboard aides who had become part of the problem. The belief in Republican circles is that Bush is unable to change the guard at the White House because that would tacitly admit something is wrong with the way he governs, and the president cannot do that.

Into his sixth year as president, Bush has preferred to promote from within -- a tendency that has brought third-level aides to the top of White House sections. Although this practice has produced staff mediocrity, nobody questions Bolten's intelligence and competency.

While Card forced himself to work 16- or 17-hour days, Bolten is a natural workaholic who as a bachelor seemed on the job continuously as director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). He is more attuned to issues than Card and gets along better with Congress, especially Speaker Dennis Hastert. Bolten stayed overtime at this year's House Republican retreat in Cambridge, Md., to chat with members of Congress.

But Bolten replacing Card also advances Rove's project, which was obvious as early as the mid-'90s, of removing the influence of people close to the elder Bush. Rove named Bolten, who then was working for Goldman Sachs in London, as the Austin-based policy director of the 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign. There is no question that Bolten is a Rove man.

Bolten's promotion does improve the professional quality of the president's chief of staff, but Republicans fear the worst about his successor at OMB. If Bush follows his usual pattern and promotes from within according to the present pecking order, the new OMB director will be the agency's current deputy, Clay Johnson. A Dallas businessman who was Gov. Bush's aide in Austin and was the administration's personnel director in Washington, Johnson has won few admirers. I found widespread hope but little optimism that he would be overlooked for the OMB post.

A dysfunctional OMB director is the last result the president needs in a White House filled with problems. The absence of a Cabinet secretary coordinating the departments with the president is an inexplicable and unnecessary shortcoming. Lesser staff positions remain unfilled, which may explain the ruinous hours that senior aides are forced to keep.

Prior to Tuesday's surprise announcement of Bolten-for-Card, a Republican parlor game was trying to guess the 21st-century counterparts of Howard Baker & Co. named by Reagan in 1987 to save his presidency. It is not an easy task to come up with good names, but it is highly unlikely that Bush and Rove made such a search. Their implicit message is that no shake-up is needed because they had nothing to do with the parlous condition of the administration and the Republican Party.

Copyright 2006 Creators Syndicate



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andycard; bolten; bush43; card; chiefofstaff; joshbolten; joshuabolten; karlrove; novak; omb; robertnovak; rove; secondterm; term2

1 posted on 03/29/2006 10:28:16 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Hey Novak...you have no role in the Bush administration and never will. Take Peggy Noonan's hand, wander out into some pasture, and get over yourself.
2 posted on 03/29/2006 10:32:41 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189


Since Novak left CNN and is now on FNC, I'm reminded of one reason I stopped watching CNN.


3 posted on 03/29/2006 10:39:15 PM PST by jazusamo (Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Novak says of Bolten:

-- "nobody questions Bolten's intelligence and competency."

-- "He is more attuned to issues than Card and gets along better with Congress"

-- "Bolten's promotion does improve the professional quality of the president's chief of staff"

Sounds like a good choice.

4 posted on 03/29/2006 10:43:51 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; All

Shut up Novak you old goat

You just jealous that nobody pay attention to you SHUT UP

Can we get Robert Novak go on hunting trip with Dick Cheney OH Pretty please with sugar on top LOL!


5 posted on 03/29/2006 10:44:59 PM PST by SevenofNine (I'd rather hunt with Dick Cheney than ride with Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

Hey!

The guy has been around for a long time and has seen all the errors, including many that Reagan committed.

Novak has a seasoned historical perspective that should be considered. I said considered, not cowtowed to.

Only fools are FULL of themselves, and there is no question that the Bush White House has been fumbling a few footballs during the last 12 months.

Renewal for the final ride is smart, wise and way overdue.


6 posted on 03/29/2006 10:48:51 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777

It's still all about the War on Terror and Iraq....


7 posted on 03/29/2006 10:55:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777
Well, Helen Thomas has been around for a long time too. Sometimes spending too much time in the same environment clouds your vision of reality. There is nobody more full of themselves than the folks who spend a career inside the beltway. I hold all of their opinions with equal esteem.

Not much.

8 posted on 03/29/2006 10:55:14 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

Novak must be a FREEPERn


9 posted on 03/29/2006 11:00:12 PM PST by bybybill (RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The belief in Republican circles is that Bush is unable to change the guard at the White House because that would tacitly admit something is wrong with the way he governs, and the president cannot do that.

We have heard so many times that this president values loyalty (both ways). Regardless whether it's a good trait or not, I think this explains more than what the 'Republican circles' asserted.

10 posted on 03/29/2006 11:13:29 PM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Lesser staff positions remain unfilled, which may explain the ruinous hours that senior aides are forced to keep. -Robert Novak

It strikes me that the second and third tiers of White House staffers are the farm team for the next GOP administration. Their ranks oughtn't to be thin. I hope people with Iraq experience (both in and out of the military) are being recruited into public service in the Administration and elsewhere.

11 posted on 03/29/2006 11:22:49 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

oh Karl you devil you.


12 posted on 03/29/2006 11:24:51 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Money will buy you a fine dog but only love can make it wag it's tail :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

~ post of the day ~


13 posted on 03/29/2006 11:29:22 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Money will buy you a fine dog but only love can make it wag it's tail :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
Please make this happen. And, further, ensure the Veep's gun is loaded with Double "0" shot! And, none of this 28ga. monkey business.

When we do a number on Novak, I want to ensure a 12 ga is employed...Both barrels !

What a scumbag that over-the-hill cretin is!
14 posted on 03/29/2006 11:37:57 PM PST by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Since Novak left CNN and is now on FNC, I'm reminded of one reason I stopped watching CNN."

Novak was on John Gibson's show yesterday. As soon as his jowly face came on displaying a smirk (over Gibson's patronizing introduction) I turned off the TV. Fox did itself no favor by picking him up after he walked off CNN.

15 posted on 03/30/2006 4:19:02 AM PST by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
snags (Snaggle-tooth) novak is pi$$ed he is not on the inside with regards to the Bush administration.

I am glad the old guard has been isolated. Their time passed when klintoon was elected. They harmed this country by keeping GHWB from campaigning to win. This allowed 8 years of scar tissue to form on our Nation.

Screw novak, and screw those that would harm President Bush because they are not "sharing" power!

LLS
16 posted on 03/30/2006 4:40:19 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

His one "All Star" appearence was a disaster, and Brit actually admitted they received many complaints. snags is a dim, and a reid-styled dim at that!

LLS


17 posted on 03/30/2006 4:43:39 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Ok gang pop quiz: Who is wrong more no-facts or little dick morris?

Having no-facts on is cruel. It's like going down to the town's home for loonies and making fun of one of the inmates.


18 posted on 03/30/2006 4:44:57 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer is the warrior we have been waiting for.We can trust him with our future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
"His one "All Star" appearence was a disaster, and Brit actually admitted they received many complaints. snags is a dim, and a reid-styled dim at that!"

I'm sure he'll be around awhile on Fox (contract). However, I don't see him that much and I wouldn't be surprised if they only trot him out to meet contractural necessity.

19 posted on 03/30/2006 4:54:04 AM PST by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

Hey Novak! Tell us something interesting, like who gave up you Valerie Plame's CIA cover. ha,ha,ha.

This is all inside baseball stuff. A staff shake up is not going to change the Bush Presidency.


20 posted on 03/30/2006 4:55:22 AM PST by GWB00 (Barbara Streisand barely made it out of high school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; LibLieSlayer

I do not get to watch FOX during the day but I have yet to see Novak on at all. I sis not know he made an appearance on the All Stars. What did Brit say about the criticism?


21 posted on 03/30/2006 5:00:26 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: babaloo
"I sis [did] not know he made an appearance on the All Stars. What did Brit say about the criticism?"

I saw his appearance on the "All Stars" and wasn't impressed. However I'm not aware of Brit's later remarks and will have to defer to LibLieSlayer for that.

I agree, yesterday's appearance on Gibson's show was the first I've seen him. I don't watch Fox all the time during the day but tune in periodically. He's been like the 'non-talking head' there. Just as well as far as I'm concerned.

My treatment of him when he was on (the TV went off) isn't unusual for me. I treat all the Dimocrat talking heads the same. For that same reason I won't watch Fox News Watch on Saturday, or Fox & Friends Weekend (because of Julian Phillips). I can always find something more intelligent to do.

22 posted on 03/30/2006 5:16:04 AM PST by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: babaloo

Brit said something to the effect, "Having Bob appear as one of the Conservative panelists didn't work out too well. We received a lot of email on the issue."

LLS


23 posted on 03/30/2006 5:21:13 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

You wouldn't think that the President's men would have to work 16-hr. days to come up with his 36% approval rating. If they all went home after 8-hrs., no one would notice.


24 posted on 03/30/2006 5:21:38 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; bcsco

Silk purse/sow's ear adage holds true again.


25 posted on 03/30/2006 5:25:40 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189


What a disappointment you are, Novak.


26 posted on 03/30/2006 5:30:06 AM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

A few years ago, I enjoyed Novak's commentaries but he seems to have lost the touch. Sad to see the male counterpart of Peggy Noonan trying to regain credibility like this. "All glory is fleeting" and they should try to get over it.


27 posted on 03/30/2006 5:42:00 AM PST by daybreakcoming (If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rokke; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SevenofNine

Why all this bitching about Novak? Is anything he says wrong?

Some people here would rather shoot the messenger than admit that the administration is flailing and is in serious danger of joining Clinton at the bottom of the rankings after 2009.


28 posted on 03/30/2006 7:35:14 AM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
"Is anything he says wrong?"

Yes, I think almost all of what he says is wrong. But then, that's my opinion about his opinion. Novak's unsourced speculation about "what is really happening" is as tiresome as all the other opinions from inside the beltway talking heads. They really aren't much different than the Hollywood celebrity chasers who make a living babbling on about who is going to get the next divorce or adopt the next Cambodian baby. Gossip is gossip. And none of it is worth much.

29 posted on 03/30/2006 8:05:47 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It's possible everybody writing about Card resigning is missing a bigger point: Card isn't burned out, he's going to head Romney's presidential campaign.
Does this mean Rove and Bush are going to try to block McCain?


30 posted on 03/30/2006 8:07:11 AM PST by jjmcgo (Patriarch of the Occident since March 1, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

I find it both plausible and interesting that Rove has finally ousted Card and is now King of the Hill in the White House.

I've always like Bolten, very competent and comes across well on television too. He's never seemed like the kind of guy you make chief of staff.


31 posted on 03/30/2006 8:22:17 AM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Bush failed to address the unhappy state of his administration and his party.

I don't see it.

The media is playing the GOP fracture over immigration and spending much bigger than it is. Even conservative columnists like Novak need to sell themselves, and the elections, to keep interest high and stroke their own egos. The fact is things look very good for the GOP in 2006, regardless of the media sponsored polls designed to sell papers. The fact that the polls aren't helping sell papers should be an indication of their effectiveness.

The polls are the only real indicator of voter dissatisfaction because the actual election show strong support for the GOP. Polls are only as good as the questions asked. They are even less informative when the results are predesigned. Dubya's job approval says nothing about who people will vote for in a midterm election and generic polls about parties mean little when people love their own Congressman but hate everyone else's Congressman. Media polls don't reflect the American opinion of the junk media or the rat party in general. I think Americans have a much lower opinion of the old media today, and I'm not sure media polls have ever been successful in shaping voter opinion. The polls in 72 convinced Nixon, or his minions, to bug the DNC, yet Nixon won by a landslide. I already mentioned the Republican take over of the Senate in 86 even though Reagan's job approval dropped to 46% just before the election. Jumpin' Jehoshaphat the exit polls in 2000 and 2004 were wrong on election day.

Here are the facts. We can't lose the House because of Gerrymandering until 2012. The rats have more seats up for re-election in the Senate. The economy is great. Unemployment is low.

Republicans can point toward a record of tax cuts, judges, and the WOT for their base. Moderates will be shown education and medicare reform, and the WOT, but the rats have no issue to run on except "let's impeach the President."

Not only that, but the rats are fighting a losing battle. The country is getting more conservative with every liberal mom's abortion. They are the fracturing party. The union voters, and black voters want protection of marriage, protection of guns, or school choice. Teachers want homo adoption and protection from their students. The rats are a coalition of anti-Bushs. They can't hold that coalition in midterm election when Bush ain't on the ticket.

The GOP base will stay with the GOP because there is no place else to go and because it is the only sane thing to do. It makes absolutely no sense to punish Dubya by electing rats.

I doubt the 06 elections will be a referendum on Dubya...
but if it is,
the White House has refused to pass the buck to Congress for sending him bloated budgets, even though Congressmen, like Mike Pence, point their finger at Dubya for signing the budgets sent to him by Congress. And if Dubya is the issue in 06, gigantic federal spending, at a rate faster than Dubya's, didn't hurt Reagan's 2nd midterm in 86...in fact we took back the Senate that year.

I think of voting in terms of a father with 2 brothers to babysit my child. The rat brother smokes dope and jerks off in the sink, and the Republican brother spends irresponsibly, but he lowered the allowance I have to pay him. I will be entrusting one of these brothers with my child's future and I've seen the Republican brother in a fight with the Taliban and Saddam. The rat brother only fights with the Republican.

I might admit that Dubya and the GOP have been ineffective on some issues, but the rats are complete f*** ups! How could any conservative let that happen after 8 years of Clinton? AWB, don't ask don't tell, Ellian Gonzales, Waco, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, First Lady Hillary, Lincoln Bedroom sleepovers for cash, Chinese tech transfers for cash, Vince Foster, and Ron Brown. The GOP base may be grumbling now but they will be shown the effectiveness of a conservative SCOTUS in reversing liberalism in the coming months, Saddam will soon be executed, and the base will hold their nose and pull the GOP lever again. in 2006.

I just want to disclose that I have been called a FROBL (Free Republic Open Border Lobby), a traitor, and a paid consultant for Vicente Fox
I think it is likely that immigration reform will get passed because Dubya has pushed for and gotten every substantive piece of legislation he promised voters and asked from Congress with the exception of SS reform. Dubya has been all about doing something to solve a problem, even if it is not effective, rather than fighting with and blaming the rats.

He will push for a bill because the problem needs to be addressed.

32 posted on 03/30/2006 9:04:50 AM PST by Once-Ler (Beware conservatives whose political consistency dictate all Presidents must be impeached.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Although President Bush’s approval ratings continue to slide in national polls, his support among Republican voters remains strong, with 80% of Republican voters approving of his job performance, and 84% expressing a strongly or somewhat favorable opinion of him. Evangelicals report an 85% approval rating of Bush, and 89% have a favorable opinion of the president.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1602351/posts


33 posted on 03/30/2006 9:48:45 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo

Great point.


34 posted on 03/30/2006 9:50:04 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler

Bump!


35 posted on 03/30/2006 9:50:57 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson