Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush reassures Fox on immigration bill
Reuters ^ | Thu Mar 30, 2006 | Related Pictures

Posted on 03/30/2006 11:02:33 PM PST by SUSSA

CANCUN, Mexico (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush reassured Mexican President Vicente Fox on Thursday he was committed to getting the U.S. Congress to approve broad immigration reforms, including a guest worker program.

(snip)

"I'm committed to having a comprehensive immigration bill on my desk, and by comprehensive I mean not only border security, a bill that has border security, a bill that has security enforcement in it, but a bill that has a worker permit program in it," Bush said.

Republicans are split on whether to back Bush's call for sweeping reforms to create a guest worker program and put several million illegal immigrants on the path to citizenship.

Conservatives in Bush's party, normally his allies, reject that as a form of amnesty and seek instead to erect a fence along a third of the U.S.-Mexico border and make illegal immigration a felony

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; amnisty; bushrobusteza; cheaplaborforgop; guestworkers; illegalaliens; illegals; mexico; mexicovisit; patriotsarise; sellout; senorshrub; wakeup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2006 11:02:36 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

'08 Bumper Sticker

"ANYBODY except a RINO or hitlery!"




Sessions and Tancredo '08

http://sessions.senate.gov/
http://tancredo.house.gov/

Monday, March 27, 2006
http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=253171&&

“The American people are counting on us to secure our borders and restore the rule of law to our immigration system. The Senate Judiciary Committee today let the American people down by passing out a blanket amnesty bill. We've been down this path several times before, and it proved a failure.
“There was a real opportunity to take the steps necessary to fix our failed immigration enforcement system and while progress was made, we did not get there. The proper approach is to first fix the enforcement system and then to undertake a national discussion about immigration, considering how to justly handle those here illegally and what rules should govern future immigration levels. We also have not effectively dealt with the national security issues.

“I voted against the committee passed legislation because it rewards illegal behavior, will be considered amnesty by the people and will not restore respect for law. Fortunately, the House of Representatives has passed a solid bill, and there will be an opportunity to improve the Senate version in the days to come.”




http://tancredo.house.gov/irc/welcome.htm

"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907




Real Conservatives FINALLY
have a winning ticket in '08




Time for the real conservatives on FR,
be it Republicans, Independents or Democrats
(like Zell Miller and John O'Neill) to band together
and oust the looney left and RINO's


The "Politically Correct RINO's" on FR are the same group
who "swore"
klintoon, hitlery, hanoi kerry, sanbdi ber(bur)glar, al bore, jane beno,
would be prosecuted for
pardongate, chinagate, the bribes in upstate NY in the 2000 NY Senate race, waco, etc, etc,
"when" the "time was right".



2 posted on 03/30/2006 11:05:24 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (It's ALWAYS a great day to be a Conservative Independent Voter AND a Viet Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
"I'm committed to having a comprehensive immigration bill on my desk, and by comprehensive I mean not only border security, a bill that has border security, a bill that has security enforcement in it, but a bill that has a worker permit program in it," Bush said.

Don't make us play the impeachment card, Mr. President. This is a line in the sand that politicians will have to go through patriots to cross.

For those of you who think for a minute that we should go along with this in order to get other parts of our agenda through government - if this program goes through and 30 million lower class immigrants are put on a guest worker track to citizenship you can forget about conservative governmental reforms being passed for the remainder of our history.
3 posted on 03/30/2006 11:05:56 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is what President Bush said on March 25, 2006

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060325.html

"Comprehensive immigration reform begins with securing our borders."

"To keep the promise of America, we must enforce the laws of America."

"One thing the temporary worker program would not do is provide
amnesty to those who are in our country illegally."

Look for the Impeach Bush t-shirt in this post
by Ladycalif

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1603387/posts?page=3#3

This sets the stage for the Dim's to be defeated in
even more 2006 and 2008 elections!

Any REAL Conservative knows the success
of the 2006 and 2008 elections
is electing those who secure our borders
and enforce the law of the land!

President Bush has set the example and
ensured a sweep in '06 and '08!

Only the looney left and the wrong rino's
would support illegal immigration
and amnesty for those who are in our country illegally!

Time for the real conservatives on FR,
be it Republicans, Independents or Democrats
(like Zell Miller and John O'Neill) to band together
and oust the looney left and RINO's




President's Radio Address March 25, 2006

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060325.html

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. On Monday, I will attend a
naturalization ceremony here in Washington. It's always inspiring to
watch a group of immigrants raise their hands and swear an oath to
become citizens of the United States of America. These men and women
follow in the footsteps of millions who've come to our shores seeking
liberty and opportunity, and America is better off for their hard
work and love of freedom.

America is a nation of immigrants, and we're also a nation of laws.
And our immigration laws are in need of reform. So at Monday's
ceremony, I will discuss my vision for comprehensive immigration
reform that will secure our borders, improve enforcement of our
immigration laws, and uphold our values.

Comprehensive immigration reform begins with securing our borders.
Since I took office, we've increased funding for border security by
66 percent, and the Department of Homeland Security has caught and
sent home nearly 6 million illegal immigrants. To improve security at
the border, we're hiring thousands more Border Patrol agents. We're
deploying new technology, like infrared cameras and unmanned aerial
vehicles, to help our agents do their job. And we're installing
physical barriers to entry, like fences in urban areas.

We're also working to end the unwise practice of catch-and-release.
For decades, many illegal immigrants were released back into society
soon after they were caught, because we did not have enough detention
space. So we're adding more beds so we can hold the people we catch,
and we're reducing the time it takes to send them back home. When
illegal immigrants know they will be caught and sent home, they will
be less likely to break the rules, and our immigration system will be
more orderly and secure. We're making good progress, but we have much
more work ahead, and we will not be satisfied until we have control
of our border.

Comprehensive immigration reform also includes strengthening the
enforcement of our laws in America's interior. Since I took office,
we've increased funding for immigration enforcement by 42 percent.
We're increasing the number of immigration enforcement agents and
criminal investigators, enhancing work site enforcement, and going
after smugglers and gang members and human traffickers.

Finally, comprehensive immigration reform requires a temporary worker
program that will relieve pressure on our borders. This program would
create a legal way to match willing foreign workers with willing
American employers to fill jobs that Americans will not do. By
reducing the number of people trying to sneak across the border, we
would free up our law enforcement officers to focus on criminals and
drug dealers and terrorists and others who mean us harm.

One thing the temporary worker program would not do is provide
amnesty to those who are in our country illegally. I believe that
granting amnesty would be unfair, because it would allow those who
break the law to jump ahead of people who play by the rules and wait
in the citizenship line. Amnesty would also be unwise, because it
would encourage waves of illegal immigration, increase pressure on
the border, and make it more difficult for law enforcement to focus
on those who mean us harm. For the sake of justice and for the sake
of border security, I firmly oppose amnesty.

In the coming days, the United States Senate plans to consider
proposals on immigration reform. This is an emotional debate. America
does not have to choose between being a welcoming society and being a
lawful society. We can be both at the same time. As we debate the
immigration issue, we must remember there are hard-working
individuals, doing jobs that Americans will not do, who are
contributing to the economic vitality of our country.

To keep the promise of America, we must enforce the laws of America.
We must also ensure that immigrants assimilate into our society and
learn our customs and values -- including the English language. By
working together, we can meet our duty to fix our immigration system
and deliver a bill that protects our country, upholds our laws, and
makes our Nation proud.

Thank you for listening.


4 posted on 03/30/2006 11:06:10 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (It's ALWAYS a great day to be a Conservative Independent Voter AND a Viet Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
Frack Fox. This maniac was on Hannity and Hannity showed what a blackmailer this SOB really is.

I like the new bill to some extent. I have always thought a fine was a good way to legitimize the illegals. However it should be enforced strictly. If you meet your deadline to pay the sheriff sends you home. Also every illegal should be reviewed and if any criminal activity is apparent, home you go. Let's also start jailing the companies and individuals who knowingly utilize illegal immigrant labour. Would love to see some Hollywood star get 30 days in the pen for their illegal pool boy.
5 posted on 03/30/2006 11:08:00 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

Tell the Mexican president to control his borders or we open fire.

We have it bad way up here, in the woods. They're everywhere. They do not speak Minnesotan, let alone english. No desire. either.

Tro 'em in da hooskaw. I says.


6 posted on 03/30/2006 11:08:48 PM PST by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

Impeachment? What in heavens name are you talking about.


7 posted on 03/30/2006 11:10:27 PM PST by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Sounds just like Hillary. Must be where she got her talking points.


8 posted on 03/30/2006 11:13:25 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
This: As of tonight in a CNN poll that sampled 5,000+ viewers, 92% oppose a guest worker program and only 8% support it. If President Bush insists on forcing this sort of program through the congress, the congress will go democratic as the GOP splits into two parties and moderates vote with the labor unions on the left.

Shortly thereafter, Bush will be impeached. Who knows, maybe he doesn't care so long as he gets his guest worker program. He and Vincente can hang around in Crawford and drink Margaritas.
9 posted on 03/30/2006 11:13:48 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Impeachment? What in heavens name are you talking about.

The people getting Big Stupid Government under control once again, perhaps.

10 posted on 03/30/2006 11:15:05 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
Don't make us play the impeachment card, Mr. President.

Idiot.

11 posted on 03/30/2006 11:15:19 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
What in heavens name are you talking about.

Oh, it's all the rage on FR! Haven't you heard?

People who say they are conservatives calling for the president to be impeached.

12 posted on 03/30/2006 11:17:12 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

All the illegals will vote for Bush now.

"doing the job Americans won't"


13 posted on 03/30/2006 11:18:34 PM PST by bannedfromdu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Idiot? Perhaps. But I'm a 92%.


14 posted on 03/30/2006 11:19:36 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin

This is insanity lol. Good gosh when has this started. I guess we should have impeached Ronald Reagan too on the same grounds. I never witness anything like this. There is a whole thread with folks talking about how wonderful that some some vandels destroyed some Spanish speaking radio towers. I swear Open border extremist on one side and then deport every illegal make them all felons and impeach the President on ours. Makes me want to open up the liquor cabinet


16 posted on 03/30/2006 11:23:24 PM PST by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

I dont think impeachment an option. I think the ole fashion way of taking a side convincing people and having a vote is how its done.


17 posted on 03/30/2006 11:24:46 PM PST by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Hank Rearden
The people getting Big Stupid Government under control once again

Yeah, the Democrats are surely going to do that, Hank.

19 posted on 03/30/2006 11:28:11 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

It's surreal, isn't it?


20 posted on 03/30/2006 11:29:15 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Catholicfreeper,

There are some lines that politicians just are not supposed to cross lest they anger their base to the point that they are turned out of office in sackcloth and ashes. This for many of us is one such line.

Let me ask you, if President Bush spoke out in opposition to the South Dakota abortion ban, would you consider him to be a pro life president? What if he had increased Planned Parenthood's funding to a higher level than any of his predecessors? Given these circumstances, would you support the man?

Unfortunately, he's done both these things.

Bush Signs Title X Funding Increase for 2005 Planned Parenthood's Abortion Funding Increased

President George W. Bush and the Republican-majority Congress Increased Title X to record $288.3 million in FY 2005 on 12/8/04

Title X is one of two major federal government funding sources for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the nation's largest chain of abortion centers (murdering over 244,000 unborn human beings per year by surgical abortion alone). Republican President signed H.R. 4818 into law, authorizing the highest ever spending level for Title X in the history of the program, on December 8, 2004. It became Public Law No. 108-447.


I am no democrat, but I am incensed by the ongoing betrayal of conservative principles by this administration. It has to stop, and this is as good a place as any.
21 posted on 03/30/2006 11:30:15 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: vik

I dont think thats GWB goal either. Oh well, like I said before there will be no bill. I GW gets one through well God Bless him. Unfort a common sense solution that could have been a start down the road to combatting this mess won't happen. Its a lose/lose situation.


22 posted on 03/30/2006 11:31:56 PM PST by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

I be interested in that. However I havent heard alarm bell going off in the pro life groups saying that the President is increasing funds for planned Parenthood. There is quite a difference between increasing funds for Title x and saying that those increased funds go to Planned Parenthood or their abortion clinics


23 posted on 03/30/2006 11:34:42 PM PST by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

Actually the towers thread is pretty funny.


24 posted on 03/30/2006 11:35:49 PM PST by bannedfromdu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
"I'm committed to having a comprehensive immigration bill on my desk, and by comprehensive I mean not only border security, a bill that has border security, a bill that has security enforcement in it, but a bill that has a worker permit program in it," Bush said.

He seems more concerned with the guest worker part than the enforcement part.

25 posted on 03/30/2006 11:40:15 PM PST by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
And Tim Pawlenty was interviewed the other, spouting the same cliched, "we're a nation of immigrants" claptrap that is driving the rest of us around the bend.

Is there some statute in the state constitution of MN mandating that they accept illiterate, nikab-draped, Somali Muslims?

Hubert Humphrey is probably rolling over in his grave.

26 posted on 03/30/2006 11:42:45 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"Yeah, the Democrats are surely going to do that, Hank."

Cheney?

Bush makes a step toward impeachment. I wouldn't support it, but if an amnesty passed, and he signs it, I won't care one bit if the democrats attempt an impeachment if they take congress this year.


27 posted on 03/30/2006 11:45:02 PM PST by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Cheney?

Can you possibly be this dumb?

28 posted on 03/30/2006 11:47:09 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Always has been.


29 posted on 03/30/2006 11:47:14 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper; Hank Rearden
There is quite a difference between increasing funds for Title x and saying that those increased funds go to Planned Parenthood or their abortion clinics.

Oh well, if he's only pandering to radical, shrill gender feminists-and reinforcing discrimination against male collegiate athletics programs-then I suppose that's okay.

For a minute there I thought you were going to tell me this president isn't really a conservative.

Phew!

What a relief.

30 posted on 03/30/2006 11:50:01 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

It must have been Specter who let this terrible bill through the Judiciary Committee.


31 posted on 03/30/2006 11:51:31 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Why not enlighten me instead of just hurling names?


32 posted on 03/30/2006 11:52:02 PM PST by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
Specter, Brownback, Graham, DeWine...

I forget the name of the other faux-Republican retard to vote for this abomination.

I guess those will have to do for now.

33 posted on 03/30/2006 11:54:22 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Why not enlighten me instead of just hurling names?

Because anybody even contemplating impeachment of a sitting Republican president for no reason other than he's not doing what YOU think he should be doing doesn't deserve a response?

34 posted on 03/30/2006 11:54:45 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

Specter and the other Bush Republicans on the committee.


35 posted on 03/30/2006 11:55:41 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

You must face the fact that for all the good he's done (and he's done a lot!) President Bush is not a conservative in the true sense of the word. Conservatives would not allow the free exchange of porous borders and the dissolution of our sovereignty. I've been pleased with the President by and large up until this point - where he is dead wrong. Of course, it costs him nothing since he's a lame duck - except maybe House and Senate seats for his compatriots. He doesn't deserve impeachment any more than his predecessor (unless you consider the sale of military secrets to Red China as treason which Clinton clearly did), but the President shine has worn off on me since he won re-election and began to show his moderate, centrist views.


36 posted on 03/30/2006 11:57:12 PM PST by kpbruinfan ("Try as they might, they cannot steal your dreams." - Neil Peart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
I think the ole fashion way of taking a side convincing people and having a vote is how its done.

Tried it. Got the same old crap, plus gigantic growth in Big Stupid Government spending, deficits and debt. What's your next idea?

37 posted on 03/30/2006 11:59:15 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kpbruinfan; Hank Rearden

http://forum.protestwarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=143353&highlight=


38 posted on 03/31/2006 12:04:01 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kpbruinfan

So he's going to be impeached because he's not conservative enough?


39 posted on 03/31/2006 12:04:02 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
No, he's going to be impeached because a Democratic Congress would be willing to impeach him, and the vast majority of the public-by that point-just won't care.
40 posted on 03/31/2006 12:05:03 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

You don't speak for the public. Thank God.


41 posted on 03/31/2006 12:06:04 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=an4lLgfrTG6s&refer=top_world_news


42 posted on 03/31/2006 12:08:53 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Bill Clinton's was lower than that; so were several other presidents.

Go ahead; try to impeach him; his numbers will go through the roof.

Republicans AND conservatives support him.


43 posted on 03/31/2006 12:10:04 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm not trying to impeach him, or help the Democrats regain control of Congress.

I don't want to see Speaker Pelosi or Senate Majority Leader Reid.

I just wish President Bush felt the same way.

44 posted on 03/31/2006 12:12:01 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Although President Bush’s approval ratings continue to slide in national polls, his support among Republican voters remains strong, with 80% of Republican voters approving of his job performance, and 84% expressing a strongly or somewhat favorable opinion of him. Evangelicals report an 85% approval rating of Bush, and 89% have a favorable opinion of the president.

More data:

http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/06_Mar_Data.pdf


I guess you just don't fit into any of those categories.


45 posted on 03/31/2006 12:13:43 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
broad immigration reforms

Nothing but thinly disguised code for amnesty.

46 posted on 03/31/2006 12:23:34 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

When my ancestors came to America, they chopped timber, made homes, and built cities. My ancestors tamed the Great Wood! I come from the stock of Paul Bunyan.

The Hmong of Saint Paul are living-up to that standard, I respect and appreciate them. Brave warriors, honorable people. A welcome addition to our state.

Minneapolis is being invaded by Osama's minions.
These new invaders take welfare, commit violent crime, and build 'enclaves'. They seek nothing but sharia.

None of them speak Minnesotan. And they have no desire to 'learn our cultre'. And the Goddamn teachers insist our kids learn their ways instead of them learning Minnesotan.

These animals have chased any real Minnesotan to private schools. (as well as the tax to pay for school for barbarians)

If I was Mayor I would make them swear allegiance to the United States of America. The State of Minnesota. And the city of Minneapolis. If they did not. DEPORT IMMEDIATLY.

But he's a "gentle. kind. feeling" person. God forbid he would have to act in the best interest of tour society/culture/union.


47 posted on 03/31/2006 12:26:52 AM PST by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: ncountylee

Yeah, like saying oral sex isn't sex.


49 posted on 03/31/2006 12:29:53 AM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Spruce

"The Hmong of Saint Paul are living-up to that standard, I respect and appreciate them. Brave warriors, honorable people. A welcome addition to our state. "


I'll bet the familes of all those hunters that a Hmong killed wouldn't agree with you. Brave warriors my a$$. I didn't read anywhere that the other Hmong in that area were sympathetic to the victims families.


50 posted on 03/31/2006 12:42:26 AM PST by Proud Conservative2 ("When people show you who they are...BELIEVE THEM the first time..." Maya Angelou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson