Skip to comments.
McKinney is distraction, say the Dems
The Hill ^
| 4/4/06
| Josephine Hearn
Posted on 04/04/2006 8:20:50 AM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
1
posted on
04/04/2006 8:20:51 AM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
2
posted on
04/04/2006 8:21:21 AM PDT
by
Palpatine
(The lesson of modern politics is that no class is less fit to govern than that which governs us now)
To: JeanS
McKinney is a skanky traitor, says Pissant
3
posted on
04/04/2006 8:21:55 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: JeanS
I tend to agree that it's a distraction. Why is this psycho woman's outburst of insanity getting front-page news while the illegals continue to burn American flags on American soil on page 10?!
Cindy McKinney is a nutcase.
THIS IS NOT BREAKING NEWS. We've known this for years!
4
posted on
04/04/2006 8:23:18 AM PDT
by
Blzbba
(Beauty is just a light switch away...)
To: JeanS
McKinney is distraction, say the DemsSays anybody who's seen that hair of hers...
5
posted on
04/04/2006 8:24:31 AM PDT
by
TomServo
To: JeanS
A distraction you say? You think? Seriously though I bet the Dems don't have the stones to dump Cindy McVictim. How about a censure? Hahahaha Unlike Republicans, Democrats always stand behind their mistakes.
6
posted on
04/04/2006 8:25:17 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: JeanS
Karl Rove told her to punch the officer.
7
posted on
04/04/2006 8:26:10 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Palpatine
8
posted on
04/04/2006 8:26:15 AM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: pissant
The notion that they would charge her is just beyond ludicrous, regardless of what happened. It sounds like a misunderstanding. She clearly wasnt intending to assault a police officer.
How in the hell do you hit someone if you were not intending to assult them? These Democratic aides are about as stupid as their bosses. I guess this is great training for them so they can run for office in the future. An endless supply of morons.
To: rhombus
A Distraction?
No, an unfiltered DEMONSTRATION of Democrats in action.
Put her in front of every camera in America to scream "racism" so Americans can know what Democrats are all about --- self-important liars and cheats with no respect or care about little guys like security officers who use false claims of "racism" and other B.S. to cover their crimes.
10
posted on
04/04/2006 8:28:06 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: JeanS
McKinney is a distraction say Dems Democrat.
Ha, ha, ha, the gift that keeps on giving.
11
posted on
04/04/2006 8:28:24 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: JeanS
"There's been a lot of eye-rolling...
12
posted on
04/04/2006 8:29:00 AM PDT
by
evets
(God bless president Bush!)
To: JeanS
I can't find my thesaurus. Is "distraction" a synonym for "low class trash"?
To: MeanWestTexan
She is an albatross around their necks.
14
posted on
04/04/2006 8:29:41 AM PDT
by
DarthVader
(Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
To: mortal19440
It's the Rodney King defense.
15
posted on
04/04/2006 8:31:00 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: JeanS
The worst insult you can hurl at someone is to call them a racist.
Those were some of the 1st words from her on this matter...when in reality, it is McKinney who is the racial bigot here.
She wasn't dressed professionally...she was wearing a jogging suit, aka sweat pants. And her hair style was a disheveled mess.
These Capitol Hill police have agreed to put themselves in the line of fire in order to protect the building AND the representatives of government.
A crazed man walked into a busy tourist entrance and killed two people.
If McKinney claims she didn't know who grabbed her arm after calling out to her 3 times (she was on the phone), then she's painted herself into a corner, because he obviously didn't recognize her either.
Charge her with attacking a police officer and let a jury decide. I hope her lawyers are expensive.
16
posted on
04/04/2006 8:31:11 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: JeanS
I happened to catch her live interview with Wolf Blitzer yesterday. He actually did a pretty good job. She and her attorneys absolutely refused to say whether or not she accosted the CH officer. The entire gist of all three of them was that there is a history of racism in this history. The bottom line was that there is now no personal responsbility required of individuals from groups who have been discriminated against in the past. Anything anyone says or does to them is but another example of this country's racism.
They have uncovered that there is an internal complaint of black officers within the Capitol Hill police concerning racism. So, of course, anything any of them would ever do is tainted if it involves a black person. This woman and her attorneys were so far removed from any concept we've ever had of personal responsibility in this country that it is absolutely amazing that they could keep a straight face. And I think they believe everything they said. Just unbelievable.
17
posted on
04/04/2006 8:31:33 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: JeanS
McKinney is drawing the limelight away from their policy goals
Outside of "Impeach Bush," the Democrats have no policy goals.
18
posted on
04/04/2006 8:31:39 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: JeanS
This isnt the view of Democrats that we want to project in the tough races, one of victims and race-baiting, the strategist said.But, it's ALL YOU HAVE. It's really all you've EVER had.
19
posted on
04/04/2006 8:33:10 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: JeanS
Its a question of fact and whether the officer put his hand on her first or whether he asked her to stop first and asked for ID. The facts will determine who was in the right and who was in the wrong, said Rep. Al Wynn (D-Md.). I would be offended and upset if [an officer] put his hands on me prior to asking for ID.And the officer would be upset and well within his/her regs to impede/restrain (or worse) you, Congressman, if you were not wearing your identification and refused multiple verbal commands to stop.
20
posted on
04/04/2006 8:34:07 AM PDT
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson