Posted on 04/04/2006 4:17:07 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
ANN ARBOR, MI – A virulently anti-Catholic resolution unanimously passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors condemning Catholic moral teaching on homosexuality and urging the Archbishop of San Francisco and Catholic Charities of San Francisco to defy Church directives prohibiting gay adoptions has prompted a federal lawsuit by the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The lawsuit, brought on behalf of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights and two San Francisco Catholic citizens, challenges the anti-Catholic resolution as a “startling attack by government officials on the Catholic Church, Catholic moral teaching and beliefs, and those who adhere to the tenets of the Catholic faith, in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.”
The March 21, 2006 resolution alludes to the Vatican as a foreign country meddling in the affairs of the City and describes the Church’s moral teaching and beliefs as “insulting to all San Franciscans,” “hateful,” “insulting and callous,” “defamatory,” “absolutely unacceptable,” “insensitive[] and ignoran[t].” The resolution calls on the local Archbishop to “defy” the Church’s teachings and describes Cardinal William Joseph Levada, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is responsible for safeguarding the doctrine on the faith and morals of the Church throughout the Catholic world, as “unqualified” to lead.
According to Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, “The demagoguery and virulent words of this resolution are reminiscent of the anti- Catholic bigotry of the Ku Klux Klan and the Know Nothings, which marred our Nation’s earlier history. San Francisco may as well have put up signs at the City limits: ‘Faithful Catholics Not Welcomed.”
Catholic doctrine proclaims that allowing children to be adopted by homosexuals would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development. Therefore, such policies are gravely immoral and Catholic organizations must not place children for adoption in homosexual households.
The lawsuit claims that the First Amendment “forbids an official purpose to disapprove of a particular religion, religious beliefs, or of religion in general.” The lawsuit states that this “anti-Catholic resolution sends a clear message to Plaintiffs and others who are faithful adherents to the Catholic faith that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community and an accompanying message that those who oppose Catholic religious beliefs, particularly with regard to homosexual unions and adoptions by homosexual partners, are insiders, favored members of the political community.”
Robert Muise, the Law Center attorney handling this matter, commented, “Our constitution forbids hostility toward any religion. In total disregard for the Constitution, homosexual activists in positions of authority in San Francisco are abusing their authority as government officials and misusing the instruments of government to attack the Catholic Church. This egregious abuse of power is an outrage and a clear violation of the First Amendment.”
I don't see anything written here about what kind of remedy they are seeking through this lawsuit. What is the purpose of the lawsuit, besides seeking to reveal the truth?
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors certainly has no problem in meddling in the foreign affairs of other countries.
Hopefully, the next earthquake. This time, the BIG one.
I don't know what remedy they are seeking, but I suppose I would ask for a retraction, an apology, and perhaps damages.
Where is the vaunted "wall of separation"? The City Council is totally out of bounds attempting to dictate faith and morals.
For your ping lists, if interested.
...ban federal funds from going to the City of San Francisco. That'll shut them up in a hurry.
I wouldn't touch them with all the A1 sauce in the world.
I wonder what the SF Board of Supervisors thinks of Islam?
stake
Dunking
This is a true encroachment on the religious freedom of the Catholics in SF. Any suit should ask for damages, censure, and anything else that can be taken from the SF bast*rds. I'm not a catholic, but this is about as ridiculous as it gets. Somebody really needs to put the SF city leaders under the rule of law again.
Want to bet that they'd go on about how we need to understand other cultures?
I'm glad that the Roman Catholics are not going to let this sort of religious bigotry pass by unchallenged.
Don't forget the hateful statements in connection with the recent Christian Youth Rally:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1602900/posts
The remedy is to force them to withdraw the statement and to bear court costs.
Thanks for always pinging me, FL. Read, even if I do not post.
It is not a coincidence, methinks, that the enemy has its sights trained on the RCC, ya think?
Well, I stole that from some good ol' Baptist preachers, years ago. I have posted it is time or more!
"Personally, I long for a return to the good old days of Catholicism, when we could just burn the Board of Stupidvisors at the steak."
"I wouldn't touch them with all the A1 sauce in the world."
Steak or chop?
" . . . mmmm . . . good steak!"
They keep preaching "separation of Church and State" as long as it fits their agenda. Apparently the shoe is on the other foot this time. Freakin' hypocrites.
LOL!!
I've been waiting for these counter suits! About time!
No idea how successful this suit will be but it's worth pursuing.
Standing up for what is right. Good. Hope the ones bringing the lawsuit lose their shirts.
Hmmmmmm....don't believe that is the way to take care of matters, do you?
A hot steak is better than a cold chop.
Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck!
Allready got those, thanks!
They'll get to us in time, the Roman Catholic Chuch certainly is a bigger target in the US though.
It is really simple to clobber the SF Supervisors e-mail. Let them know how much you appreciate their attacks on the Catholic Church.
Michela.Alioto-Pier@sfgov.org
Jake.McGoldrick@sfgov.org
Aaron.Peskin@sfgov.org
Fiona.Ma@sfgov.org
Ross.Mirkarimi@sfgov.org
dalyweb@sfgov.org
dalyweb@sfgov.org
Sean.Elsbernd@sfgov.org
Bevan.Dufty@sfgov.org
Tom.Ammiano@sfgov.org
Sophie.Maxwell@sfgov.org
Gerardo.Sandoval@sfgov.org
Folks who do this are generally cowardly. Give 'em a chill!
Self-ping for later action.
Their hypocricy is that they are promoting one religion: secular humanism...
According to Sanfranciscosentinal.com, they are seeking $1 (just 1) in damages to each of the two citizens who are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. That, and all the attorney costs that will have to be reimbursed...and, the TRUTH!
I already emailed Sean, who claims to be a Catholic, to clue him into some truths...
Just like those master card commercials: Compensatory damages....$2, attorneys fees....$X, the Truth...Priceless!
I had never even heard of this group, I guess it shows how much I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.