Even if SH came out now at his trial and said he had all the WMD's he needed and was going to use them on Iran, Israel and the USA, the MSM and Dummo-crats still would say Bush lied and now put SH up to saying that ....
posted on 04/08/2006 1:06:46 PM PDT
("The Americans on Flight93 did more to counter terrorism than the Democrats have done in 4 years")
For the DU mantra to be true, that 'Bush Lied etc' the following would have to be true.
Bush during the 92-2003 time frame Bush would have had to collected ALL the US Intel on Iraq. (With 1996 or 1998 to 2000 time frame being the most crucial!) Bush would have had to analyze ALL the US Intel. Also Bush would have been the most persuasive President that has ever existed because he would have had to persuade every member of the UN Security Council and other nations in the Middled East that he was right & their intel services were wrong. Or Bush had to do the collection and analysis for them ! All of that would have been a nice trick for a Texas Governor Remember no Security Council member or nation local to Iraq disagreed as to whether Saddam had WMD, the disagreement was what to do about it. A President only knows what his subordinates tell him. If the daily briefs are in error or dishonest. The a President has to ask how & why ! How did these services become so ineffectual & why did that occur ? It certainly takes time for these services to decay. If a President is relatively new to office its doubtful that he caused. It takes several years of bad appointments and bad personnel policies to render these services ineffective.
posted on 04/08/2006 1:53:47 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson