Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petition to Ban Arlen Specter from the Republican Party
April 9, 2006 | new yorker 77

Posted on 04/09/2006 9:13:37 AM PDT by new yorker 77

I am sick of this dishonest media whore.

1) FAILURE TO EXPEDITE JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS

2) PROMOTING AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS

3) OPPOSING EXTENSION OF THE TAX CUTS

4) MORE PRO ABORTION THAN NARAL

5) SAYING THE TERRORIST SURVIELLANCE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

6) SAYING IMPEACHMENT IS ALWAYS AN OPTION

7) ALLOWING FOR A HEARING ON FEINGOLD'S CENSURE OF THE PRESIDENT

8) NOW CALLING FOR BUSH AND CHENEY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON LEAKS

Arlen Specter is a plague on this nation and the Republican Party.

This media whore needs to hear the message from conservatives nationwide.

Specter Contact Info: http://specter.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Offices.Home


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 109th; gop; judiciarycommittee; petitions; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Cai Della; stopem

It an theoretical petition, I signed it theoretically. :-)


Sorry, thought I was being clever by posting "SIGNED". Thought the whole thread was the petition.


41 posted on 04/09/2006 10:31:18 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (In the end it does not matter if you win. All men die. What matters is how you lived. No surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Specter shouldn't be kicked out of the Republican Party, he just shouldn't have been rewarded with a leadership position. It signals a party that really doesn't have any strong convictions outside of business, and doesn't really care about domestic policy except when it interferes with business.
42 posted on 04/09/2006 10:54:57 AM PDT by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

First of all, that hypothesis is nuts.

Secondly, The Discovery Channel performed a sample experiment that showed the single bullet could have easily created every wound it created and come out without deformation.

Oswald killed Kennedy. Science proved it. Monnbats deny it.

I'm an engineer. I understand this stuff. The bullet easily penetrated Kennedy and the man sitting in front of him. It's momentum was impeded by human flesh. The bullet did not deform.

You have to be a non-scientific kook to believe otherwise.


43 posted on 04/09/2006 11:03:48 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Okay, when he's up, I'll vote against him. Details... sheesh.


44 posted on 04/09/2006 11:25:41 AM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
I'm no fan of Arlen Specter's, but you have to give the devil his due. When he allowed the hearings on Feingold's proposal to censure the President, he spoke against censuring President Bush and made Feingold look as silly as his proposal...even Feingold's own party would not support him.

Having said that, I do believe he owes the President more loyalty than he has shown. He definitely is not a Conservative, and I think he erred badly with his "single bullet theory" in the JFK assassination. Because of that error, we will probably never know the truth about what really happened in Dallas that day.

45 posted on 04/09/2006 11:28:38 AM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I saw the crap on the Discovery channel. To make it "work" they moved JFK's wound from his throat to his upper right chest. That is a LIE!

Smarten up. Read A FAREWELL TO JUSTICE by Joan Mellon, just published. Shows in total how the CIA murdered JFK.

Don't look for the MSM to cover this anytime soon. They have been on board the coverup for 43 years.


46 posted on 04/09/2006 11:39:32 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

PS: Before you go around calling people names because they disagree with you MR. Engineer, study up on the subject. In addition to Mellon's book read ULTIMATE SACRIFICE by Hartman and Waldron, brand new, just published; like Mellon, they find a conspiracy. Oswald was set up and Specter played a big part in the coverup.

The only people who believe the official findings anymore on those who have listened to Cronkite, Rather, and the other liars who peddled Warren Comm crap for years.


47 posted on 04/09/2006 11:43:47 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
I beg to differ on both counts.

Regarding the censure garbage. Acknowledging the temper tantrum of Feingold is wrong in and of itself. Holding a hearing justifies Feingold's bad behavior.

Secondly, I'm an engineer. If on bullet of the same caliber and from the same rifle takes the path that it took through Kennedy and the man sitting in front of him and is able to cleanly pass most bones in both individuals, it will not deform.

I understand materials science and human physiology. Let's just say it applies to my line of work today. The single bullet theory makes no sense to the layman.

Even the Discovery channel found the single bullet theory to be correct. The bullet had a slight deformation in it and it did not penetrate the leg of the man sitting in front of Kennedy only because the trajectory of the bullet was deflected by a wrist bone in the test dummy. Had it missed that bone, the bullet would have penetrated the top of the leg without any deformation.
48 posted on 04/09/2006 11:44:32 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kjo

You need serious mental help.


49 posted on 04/09/2006 11:45:13 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kjo
I've forgotten more science and engineering than you could even learn in ten lifetimes.

When you make a career in something other than counting your fingers, you get back to me. Until then, tin foil hats just went on sale at Walgreens.

50 posted on 04/09/2006 11:47:01 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Oh LOL!

Indeed than consider it signed.


51 posted on 04/09/2006 12:04:43 PM PDT by stopem (There are 298 million of us! 10-20 million of them, WE will win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
Specter had conservative opposition in the last GOP primary and George Bush squashed it.

I've never seen any president not endorse his own party's incumbent - senator, representative, or otherwise. For what other reason would the RNC endorse Specter and Chaffee?

52 posted on 04/09/2006 12:12:43 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh: kevlar protection from the Drive-By Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Arlen Specter is a lame duck Senator serving out his last days. Aside from providing help to Bush on judicial nominations, he's of no importance.


53 posted on 04/09/2006 12:14:53 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Arlen Specter is a plague on this nation and the Republican Party.

Actually, Congress, whether Republican or Democrat, is the plague on this nation!

54 posted on 04/09/2006 12:15:42 PM PDT by CommandoFrank (Peer into the depths of hell and there you will find the face of Islam...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

The SPECTRE of lone assassin Specter as the head of the Judiciary Committee is frightening!


55 posted on 04/09/2006 12:16:51 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Sounds like Specter is corrupt and/or mentally unbalanced.


56 posted on 04/09/2006 12:18:13 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
"He did it because his campaign team was advising him to do so in order to win Pennsylvania"

Oh, yes. I get it. Who cares if it's a liberal as long as there's an "R" beside his name. Good way to destroy a party.

57 posted on 04/09/2006 1:02:10 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
President Bush and Rick Santorum(R-PA) backed this guy to the hilt for his re-election last time around.

You startin' to get the big picture yet?

FMCDH(BITS)

58 posted on 04/09/2006 1:16:55 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
You and I will have to disagree about the hearing on Feingold's censure proposal, because, in my opinion, when you expose a man's idiocy, you've destroyed his credibility. Feingold's rhetoric about censure has backfired on him, and he is no longer taken seriously.

Engineering is an admirable profession...my husband is an engineer! I, however, do not claim to have any expertise in the field of materials science or human physiology. I've watched several tapes that have been assimilated to explain the single bullet theory, and I have not been convinced they are accurate. I am what you accurately described as a 'layman', but I am able to comprehend what I read, and there are books that do not agree with your theory....one by a medical doctor. "JFK Conspiracy of Silence" was written by Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw,M.D. in 1992. Dr. Crenshaw was directly involved in trying to save the lives of JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas's Parkland Hospital. I have also looked at autopsy pictures of the entrance of a bullet in the front of Kennedy's throat. I am not trying to be argumentative or insulting, because we're both entitled to our beliefs, but are you telling me there was no exit wound in the back of Kennedy's skull?

Dr. Crenshaw's book shows a picture of the bullet with this description: The infamous "Magic Bullet." This missile is credited with causing seven wounds to two men while having sustained little damage itself. A physical impossibility. So good people can disagree! :)

59 posted on 04/09/2006 3:21:42 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Don't forget his Scottish law Not proven impeachment garbage...

Three GOP moderates will vote against conviction

http://rss.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/10/impeachment/


60 posted on 04/09/2006 3:26:39 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson