Well, try buying the book and find out yourself. The burden of proof is now on the Libs. If they can disprove this book, then lets get it on and put up the facts. I am currently in Iraq and I have spoke to two Marines who have seen WMDs. I, myself work in environmental clean up. Trust me you would pooooop if you knew what was here at one time and is continuing to be found close to the Syrian boarder. Thats about all I can say. I know Bryan and he is good at his research.
Thanks for the response. I will look into this matter.
So, in all honesty, the administration, CFR folks, Trilateral Commission members, and the Bildeburg members, have agreed to the need of the cover-ups as not to scare the general public (world that is) as to threaten global economic business, and most importantly cover their butts from a political viewpoint.
"The burden of proof is now on the Libs. If they can disprove this book, then lets get it on and put up the facts."
The facts are all out there. Take this quote:
"Nuclear material to include yellowcake and enriched uranium were found in Iraq after the 2003 invasion."
That is so demonstrably false that I actually laughed when I read it. The yellowcake and enriched uranium that was found in Iraq was not touted as a "find" by the administration because we already knew it was there legally - it was tagged, sealed and monitored by the IAEA:
"The visit was agreed after weeks of pleading by the IAEA, which has kept the radiological materials at the site safely under UN seal for 12 years" - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3009082.stm
The invasion, and subsequent looting, actually led to the possibility of this stuff falling into the wrong hands, so it's little wonder that it's kept quiet. Seriously, how can this book be taken seriously if it contains such obvious misinformation?
Godspeed to you, hildy123.