I was operating off the premise that a lot more have been found, based on this article, than even you are acknowledging. My question is based on the assumption that your statements are part of the lie itself. Who knows though.
Remember the convoy though. Regardless of how many have been "found," the reality is that if most of the weapons were spirited off to Syria, I suppose we wouldn't be in a position to pound the table on them quite yet, even if we knew it and knew exactly where they are.
So now we've gone from "most of the weapons were found" to "most of the weapons were moved and therefore cannot be found".
Perhaps if the weapons were indeed moved to Syria, and were therefore not in Iraq, we invaded the wrong country?