Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local Library Refuses to Disclose 11 yo Child's Withdrawals to Parent Cites Privacy Rights
04.11.06 | chickensoup

Posted on 04/11/2006 5:19:44 PM PDT by Chickensoup

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: Chickensoup

Ask the government. Under the Patriot Act they have access to all library records, so they can tell what everyone is reading. Every time you check out something at the library, our government gets a record on you. They have to make sure you are not reading something your not supposed to. So, go ask them what your son has checked out, they already know.


81 posted on 04/13/2006 4:53:11 AM PDT by southlake_hoosier (.... One Nation, Under God.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: southlake_hoosier
Every time you check out something at the library, our government gets a record on you.

That's not true at all.

82 posted on 04/13/2006 5:13:12 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
This is a conundrum.

In the real world, if your underage son had run up a $1,000 phone bill calling 900-numbers, at least the phone company would provide you with an accounting.

Why should the library be exempt from providing the same information?

They should just surround the State House with crime tape and be done with it.

83 posted on 04/13/2006 2:34:22 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

How the library getting between you and your son!? Have you tried asking your son which books he has out? It sounds like the library is staying out your personal life.

Is he not telling you which books he has?


84 posted on 04/17/2006 10:19:03 AM PDT by Mephari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mephari

Not at all. But remember I am responsible for his books, his fines and his well being. Legally and morally.


85 posted on 04/17/2006 10:56:48 AM PDT by Chickensoup (The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Mephari
Is he not telling you which books he has?

Flawed question -a liberal tact premising the 'village' concept.

The answer is irrelevant UNLESS one would suggest that a parent requires permission from thier children as to the authority to parent and method of parenting...

This is simply the government inserting itself between parent and child using the judicially fabricated 'privacy' argument...

86 posted on 04/17/2006 11:05:33 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
And parents are still responsible for the fines.

I think not. Forcing the parent to pay the fines of the child would be a violation of that parent's privacy rights.

87 posted on 04/17/2006 12:00:02 PM PDT by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Easy solution to this.

Just tell them that if they want their books back, they will have to tell you which books he has out.

Furthermore, if they want to collect overdue charges from you son, he has no means of paying. SO, if they want YOU to pay, they will have to tell you what books he has out.


88 posted on 04/17/2006 12:22:11 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

If you read the thread they are not permitted legally to tell me this. It is against the law that the Maine State Library association had sponsored.

Because of the law she has no choice.


89 posted on 04/17/2006 2:09:38 PM PDT by Chickensoup (The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

I think not. Forcing the parent to pay the fines of the child would be a violation of that parent's privacy rights.


Unfortunatly this falls into the same catagory as children's abortion rights. They can have an abortion without parental knowledge or consent but the parents are still responsible for the bills for any complications that may arise.


90 posted on 04/17/2006 2:11:15 PM PDT by Chickensoup (The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

It's sad. I used to ride my bike to the library and return with upwards of 40 books, and I sometimes went twice a week in the summer. I never once had a book with any sexual content, etc. in the childrens' area. I was so proud when I got my own card as soon as I could write my name.

I take my children to the library, or we reserve books online and my husband picks them up. They couldn't ride there even if
they had their own cards.

So many wonderful things are gone from our world.


91 posted on 04/17/2006 2:24:28 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

That one's easy. Tear up the kid's library card and mail it back to library. Take him (or her) off the list. Make 'em check out the books on YOUR card.

Problem solved.


92 posted on 04/17/2006 2:28:08 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

That one's easy. Tear up the kid's library card and mail it back to library. Take him (or her) off the list. Make 'em check out the books on YOUR card.

Problem solved.

I agree. In the short term MY problem is solved. But my child just lost another freedom, as did all the other children and parents affected by this law.


93 posted on 04/17/2006 3:05:06 PM PDT by Chickensoup (The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup; southlake_hoosier

"Under the Patriot Act they have access to all library records, so they can tell what everyone is reading. Every time you check out something at the library, our government gets a record on you." If you believe that statement, you haven't paid attention to the fuss librarians have made against the PATRIOT Act or you have never read the Library Bill of Rights.

I'd say most libraries's systems do not keep a history of what you take out and certainly don't send it on to the government automatically. IF, someone supeoned the library, they'd only be able to show what is currently taken out.

Since you took the books out and you can't remember, I'm sure by now you've taken your son back to the library. Have him ask what books are still out.

A lot of laws are made because we became aware of everyone needing to CYA. Many laws are made because when an incident happens, someone sues. Then a law is made or changed. A lot of laws don't make sense.

I would have thought the head of your library board would have known the laws, policies and procedures of your library. He's probably reading up on them now. We review a lot of ours annually to see if changes may be necessary.


94 posted on 04/17/2006 8:37:51 PM PDT by newpooh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: newpooh

A lot of laws are made because we became aware of everyone needing to CYA. Many laws are made because when an incident happens, someone sues. Then a law is made or changed. A lot of laws don't make sense.

I would have thought the head of your library board would have known the laws, policies and procedures of your library. He's probably reading up on them now. We review a lot of ours annually to see if changes may be necessary.


When laws are inadvertently made that separate parents from their authority over their children, that is one thing, but if you go to the links I listed, you will see that the Maine State librarian purposly made this law to subvert parental authority.


95 posted on 04/17/2006 8:46:00 PM PDT by Chickensoup (The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

When laws are inadvertently made that separate parents from their authority over their children, that is one thing, but if you go to the links I listed, you will see that the Maine State librarian purposly made this law to subvert parental authority.

No, I didn't see that. I saw that the law was made by your Maine legislature, not a librarian. They were just following the law.

I do understand your point, but, also that you were aggrevated you couldn't get an answer.


96 posted on 04/17/2006 9:11:39 PM PDT by newpooh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
He said the Maine State Library Association is very powerful
97 posted on 04/17/2006 11:20:09 PM PDT by mondonico (Peace through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

As far as I'm concerned my children don't have any freedoms - just privledges. When they start paying some of their own bills we'll talk freedom...


98 posted on 04/18/2006 5:43:42 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
Who is liable for the overdues or replacements on these books?

Me. A child under 18 cannot make a legal contract.

You are not legally responsible unless you signed something when he got his library card. If he signed for the card himself, the library has no recourse against you.

Actually, a minor can enter into a contract. The caveat is that, while the minor can enforce the contract, the other party cannot. For instance, say I make a contract to sell my car to a minor for $2000.00, and later find out that I can get $3000.00 for it. I cannot void the contract on the grounds that the other party is a minor.

On the other hand, if in the same situation, the minor finds out that he can get the same car for $1000.00, he can void the contract, and I have no recourse against him or his parents, unless I got his parents to sign the contract as well.

99 posted on 04/18/2006 6:05:25 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

When a parent signs permission for a child to have their own library card, that parent is also abrogating the right to access the child's records. If a parent feels their child is not ready for that then they shouldn't give permission for them to have their own card.

And as for the husband and wife, it's a catch-all rule to protect the hopefully few cases where problems would arise if one spouse knows what the other spouse is reading--such as a book on divorce. Couples who want to be able to check out each other's reserved books might try getting a joint card with both of their names on it.


100 posted on 04/29/2006 9:19:25 PM PDT by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson