Posted on 04/19/2006 5:41:55 AM PDT by Col. Bob
Most Westerners read the map of the world like a Broadway marquee: north is top of the billAmerica, Britain, Europe, Russiaand the rest dribbles away into a mass of supporting players punctuated by occasional Star Guests: India, China, Australia. Everyone else gets rounded up into groups: Africa, Asia, Latin America.
But if youre one of the down-page crowd, the center of the world is wherever you happen to be. Take Iran: it doesnt fit into any of the groups. Indeed, its a buffer zone between most of the important ones: to the west, it borders the Arab world; to the northwest, it borders NATO (and, if Turkey ever passes its endless audition, the European Union); to the north, the former Soviet Union and the Russian Federations turbulent Caucasus; to the northeast, the Stansthe newly independent states of central Asia; to the east, the old British India, now bifurcated into a Muslim-Hindu nuclear standoff. And its southern shore sits on the central artery that feeds the global economy.
(Excerpt) Read more at city-journal.org ...
Mark for later read.
This is old, or from last week.
And lets not forget Bill Clintons extraordinary remarks at Davos last year: Iran today is, in a sense, the only country where progressive ideas enjoy a vast constituency. It is there that the ideas that I subscribe to are defended by a majority.
Yipes! Whatever did BJ mean by this one?
He meant "Where are the interns?"
On The Origins of War by Donald Kagan Published 1995...
"The Cuban missile crisis demonstrated that it is not enough for the state that wishes to maintain peace and the status quo to have superior power. The crisis came because the more powerful state also had a leader who failed to convince his opponent of his will to use its power for that purpose."
http://community-2.webtv.net/rtowen/myBlog/page2.html ...rto
On The Origins of War by Donald Kagan Published 1995...
"The Cuban missile crisis demonstrated that it is not enough for the state that wishes to maintain peace and the status quo to have superior power. The crisis came because the more powerful state also had a leader who failed to convince his opponent of his will to use its power for that purpose."
http://community-2.webtv.net/rtowen/myBlog/page2.html ...rto
Nuking Iran would be a lot cheaper than invading it
Excellent points. Particularly these:
Number five is the one that has our political leaders stumped. The professional political classes in Western societies are abashed and frightened by the "naivete and primitiveness" of anyone who actually says what they mean and means what they say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.