Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stakes Rise in Japan-S. Korea Island Flap
AP ^ | 04/19/06 | JOSEPH COLEMAN

Posted on 04/19/2006 8:41:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Stakes Rise in Japan-S. Korea Island Flap

By JOSEPH COLEMAN, Associated Press Writer

1 hour, 55 minutes ago

Japan defied South Korean protests Wednesday and dispatched two ships to begin a maritime survey near disputed islets between the two nations, raising the stakes in the territorial standoff.

South Korea earlier had dispatched a flotilla of patrol boats to guard the territory, held by Seoul but claimed by Tokyo.

Two Japanese survey vessels left Sakaiminato on Wednesday, headed for the islands, said Yuzuru Kubota, a coast guard official in the port city on Japan's west coast.

But he said the ships were lingering just beyond the bay and were not steaming immediately toward the survey area. Japan has refused to provide a schedule; news reports said the survey could start as soon as Thursday.

South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon warned Japan not to go ahead, saying his country — which has long protested Japan's repeated claims to the islets — was preparing for "all scenarios" in the dispute.

South Korean local media have reported that Seoul may try to capture Japanese vessels entering disputed waters.

"If Japan pushes ahead ... we will react sternly to it in accordance with international and domestic laws," Ban told a nationally televised news conference. "The responsibility for all problems caused by this lies with Japan."

"The government is preparing countermeasures for all scenarios," Ban said without elaborating. He spoke after President Roh Moo-hyun held a sudden meeting with security ministers to discuss the dispute.

Later in the day, the South Korean parliament approved a resolution calling for a halt to the survey.

Ban's comments came after Roh on Tuesday called the survey, expected to last through the end of June, an "offensive provocation."

Japan, however, has flatly refused to abandon the project. Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said on Wednesday that Japan's right to the study was protected under international law.

"I would like the South Korean side to understand this point well," Abe told reporters. "Japan will calmly proceed with its activities in line with international law."

Kubota, the Japanese coast guard official, refused to provide full details of the survey, but said the area covered comprised of a vast rectangle just north of the disputed islands.

He refused to say how close the ships would come to the outcroppings, but he said it rested completely within Japan's exclusive economic zone according to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The bluster on both sides, however, was coupled with calls to find a diplomatic solution to the impasse. The two countries have sparred repeatedly in recent years over the islets, which rise from waters rich in fish and other national resources.

The dispute flared recently when Japan's Education Ministry edited public school textbooks to say the volcanic outcroppings belong to Japan. Seoul's ambassador to Japan issued a formal complaint over the change.

The surveys are aimed at collecting hydrographic data. Japan's Sankei and Asahi newspapers said the boats — 621-ton Meiyo and 605-ton Kaiyo — were to collect data before an international conference on ocean floor topography in June in Germany.

At the conference, South Korea was expected to propose its own name for the area surrounding the islets, the papers said. South Korea prefers the "East Sea" to the "Sea of Japan," as it is known internationally.

Japan's survey comes after South Korea conducted a similar study. Japanese officials say Seoul's research was part of its effort to change the body of water's name, but South Korean officials deny that is their aim.

The island tiff comes amid rocky relations between the two Asian neighbors.

South Korea, which nurses angry memories of Japan's harsh 1910-1945 colonization of the Korean Peninsula, has fervently objected to Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's repeated visits to a Tokyo war shrine considered by critics to be a glorification of Japanese militarism.

Roh canceled a scheduled summit with Koizumi last year because of the shrine visits and later avoided a customary one-on-one meeting with the Japanese leader on the sidelines of a regional conference.

South Korea's ambassador to Japan, Ra Jong-il, said that he'd seen relations between the two countries deteriorate in the two years since he arrived in Tokyo.

"This problem is another example of Japan's long-standing attempt to distort history, and the problem must be resolved comprehensively," he told reporters at the Japan Press Club.

Despite the political tension, however, economic and other exchanges between the two countries have remained intact and the two sides have also cooperated closely to resolve the dispute over North Korea's nuclear program.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: confrontation; dispute; dokdo; eez; surveyship; takeshima; territory
What I am interested in is how U.S. feels about this whole incident. Irritating development which could complicate solutions to current on-going conflict with N. Korea, or essentially inconsequential little spat between two countries, or well-coordinated plan to rattle S. Korean gov into its own political destruction?

Currently, U.S. is working on rattling N. Korea, hoping to achieve implosion of N. Korean regime. In the process, U.S. needs to rattle S. Korea and China which continue to keep N. Korean regime alive. I am not sure if I can safely rule out that U.S. and Japan talked over the plan to use Dokdo issue to politically incapacitate the current anti-American S. Korean gov.

1 posted on 04/19/2006 8:41:24 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...


2 posted on 04/19/2006 8:42:02 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I wouldn't rule it out either, although I think the cage-rattling in this case is more likely to consist merely of U.S. silence. We have absolutely no reason to prop up Mr. Roh - let him see if his buddy Kim can call in a favor or two for him here. Everybody loves Kimmie...

3 posted on 04/19/2006 8:47:45 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"What I am interested in is how U.S. feels about this whole incident."
Why should we feel anything? Let them figure it out all by themselves..............They are big boys, and the UN is just itching for something constructive to do.............................
4 posted on 04/19/2006 8:51:39 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When did being white, christian and consevative become a criminal offense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

I agree.

5 posted on 04/19/2006 8:52:40 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When did being white, christian and conservative become a criminal offense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Interesting theory.

What if S. Korea gets into a dispute with Japan, and NK says it will back S. Korea?

6 posted on 04/19/2006 8:54:26 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Re #6

N. Korea already does. The real issue is whether N. Korea will act on it. If it is, the whole thing will turn into a bloody mess.

7 posted on 04/19/2006 8:57:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

I think everyone knows our position on N korea.

8 posted on 04/19/2006 8:58:09 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


We need this crap like we need a hole in our head. We are fighting crazy ass islamic jihadists that will do anything to kill us and the asia-pac region(which is our biggests economic partners) with china,Japan,South and North Korea looks to be going to hell in a handbasket. Why does the US have to solve everyones problem. These people should be able to sort it out.

9 posted on 04/19/2006 9:01:11 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Did I miss something or where the names of the disputed islets or rocks or whatever never mentioned in the article?

10 posted on 04/19/2006 9:12:21 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

I know how this can get resolved quickly.

Move some intermediate range nukes to Taiwan.

This also works with getting Iran to stop developing nukes.

11 posted on 04/19/2006 9:47:44 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This sucks. I know that troublesome history, but we need SF and Japan to be tight, to help us out against 10 million PRC troops in 10 years...

Hey SK and Japan --for the good of us all, SAVE IT FOR THE CHINESE..!

12 posted on 04/19/2006 11:20:14 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Re #10

Its name is Dokdo(aka Takeshima.)

13 posted on 04/19/2006 9:43:27 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson