Posted on 04/24/2006 6:55:18 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
I'm sure his health problem w/out a colon is not a factor for the WH since W's brother had his colon removed yrs ago and functions as normally as any of us.
I suggest engaging the press; that is publically drawing them out on THEIR perceptions as the basis for their questions. It would expose their true biases. For example;
Is it your feeling, David Gregory, that Valerie Plame was an undercover agent? Her behaviour indicates she was not "undercover" and therefore there's no "CIA leak." Why do you in the media insist on calling it a CIA leak?
Pick an issue and draw them out. Expose them. Make our case in every instance.
Comparing Stephanapolous to Tony Snow?? These are not even remotely similar. Why the objection? ABC is ideally unbiased. The WH press Sec. clearly IS, or should be. McClellan perhaps tried to appear too objective.
Tony would be a great guy for the job - no doubt. But just as far as the MSM will let it go. It is quite possible that the idea of "courting the media" will be about as effective as Bush's "new tone in Washington". A major naive joke.
The MSM has chosen sides. It does not make any difference who you put in that job. IMHO, the MSM will remain on the blind liberal attack, without any regard for anything this adminstration might do. It does not matter -- Bush is hated and will remain a target for everything.
Of course no diplomacy or respect is required of the Whitehouse press. You are right but I see in Tony a lot more clarity in putting forth his responses and that would be a good thing. We need somebody who sees the truth clearly and that has Tony's name written all over it. If he is offered and takes the job, perhaps he can give us FReepers a sign every now and then.
Tony Snow is too good to be Bush's press secretary. PLEASE don't take the job, Tony.
Tony Snow is too good to be Bush's press secretary. PLEASE don't take the job, Tony...
-----
You make a good point here. I see Tony as being above being an apoligist for Bush's failed domestic agenda, especially the issue of illegal immigration and our border security.
Your anti-Admin rhetoric is showing.
CAN YOU REPEAT THAT QUESTION??
No, I just think the job is crap, a thankless job. And the man has five children and an uncertain health future. I hope he spends it with his family.
I'm not a big fan of this idea. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1619047/posts
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
Well it may be a crappy job..I'm with you there. But you can't expect to be "Thanked" for any job. You have to want to do it for yourself.
Fortune favors the brave...
Tony does more good in his current position. My vote: A conservative Don Rickles.
Your statement seems to imply that everyone hates the President.
-----
No, that is not what I said. It is the LEFT and the MSM that are the hate-mongers. That should have been clear from the gist of the reply. Sadly, Bush has been too passive in his own defense over his years in office. If he had been much tougher with his twisted critics of the left, I think he would have much more respect in the MSM, but he chose the "turn the other cheek" mode, which has cost him dearly.
Last week we discussed sending Scott McClellen a sugestion that he begin the daily session with retractions by the various papers.
I sent Tony a similar request just now along with continued best wishes.
If you read some of the comments on this topic (which suggest that Tony will do a WWF style smackdown on the MSM), there are "half-brains" (as you put it) who may need to pause and reflect. It's tough to be charming and confrontational at the same time.
Somebody needs to do it and if Tony wants the job, I want Tony.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.