Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions arise about scholars who collaborated in National Geographic’s Gospel of Judas
Catholic News Agency ^ | April 24, 2006

Posted on 04/24/2006 1:25:05 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2006 1:25:08 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Catholic Ping - Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 04/24/2006 1:25:49 PM PDT by NYer (Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

More MSM whining "We're talking about Christianity, why aren't you Christians watching us?"


3 posted on 04/24/2006 1:27:38 PM PDT by HumanitysEdge (http://www.wilhite.homeip.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Sooo, she admits that anti-Semitism is a bad thing. Alright, so far so good. You'd assume that the next step is denouncing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right? Wrong. Christians are the enemy of Jews! Muslims are peaceful and would never seek to wipe Israel off the map. Nor do they wish to convert or kill every Jew on the face of the planet.


4 posted on 04/24/2006 1:28:07 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have listened to Ehrman he is a Christianity debunker.


5 posted on 04/24/2006 1:28:46 PM PDT by FreedomSurge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This furor is about nada, zilch. This book of Judas has been known for centuries. For those interested here's a link to Early Christian Writings, some of value,some not.

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/


6 posted on 04/24/2006 1:32:01 PM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Ad hominem arguments are fellatious. To argue with their output, one needs to pick apart their logic, lingustics and textology, not their biographies. What was the name of that islamic professor whose best argument was "you are a heretic"?


7 posted on 04/24/2006 1:38:25 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I doubt you are going to find many "pro-canonical" Biblical scholars who are going to be interested in participating with a TV special that hypes a work that contradicts the traditional Bible.


8 posted on 04/24/2006 1:41:13 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Hey, hey, hey.... my favorite guy in the NT (next to Jesus) is finally getting a fair shake! Quit nit-picking!


9 posted on 04/24/2006 1:41:20 PM PDT by ziggygrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Ill need to do Penance for it, but I sat down to watch it the other night. I shut it off halfway through. Not because I questioned the science, but because of the arrogance of the Coptic Scholars. I was really struck by their attitudes..


10 posted on 04/24/2006 1:46:15 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mckinney in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper
>This furor is about nada, zilch

There's no way to know
if the version getting press
is real or contrived.

So many 'experts'
involved with the project have
such passionate views

against the 'classic'
Christian view of Jesus Christ,
any document

they give support to
should be called questionable.
They may overlook

blatant forgeries,
or their 'zeal' might persuade them
to forge things themselves,

using their knowledge
to create very good fakes.
(And this attention

to the strong bias
among so-called experts might
call into question

other high profile
revisionist Christian finds . . .
Should we really trust

all the 'Dead Sea' scrolls?
Even today the story
of their 'discovery'

is just that, story.
Two generations ago,
we hadn't wised up . . .)

11 posted on 04/24/2006 1:47:14 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Ad hominem arguments are fellatious.

You might want to reconsider the spelling of that...

12 posted on 04/24/2006 1:49:16 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomSurge

Precisely.

"The Davinci Code" and "The Gospel of Judas" are mainstream attempts to undermine the importance of the Gospel. They target Jesus Christ's divinity by insisting that He was just a regular man. A regular man who married a woman and also knowingly asked people to sin.

By defiling Christ's wonderful message (and subsequently deceiving mankind), they serve the interests of Satan.

Ignore these dishonest films, and keep your faith strong in the Lord. There is no other path to grace, peace and truth without belief in the Gospel.

No, Judas does not count as a Gospel!!!


13 posted on 04/24/2006 1:52:27 PM PDT by Emmet Fitzhume ("Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Ad hominem arguments are fellatious.

I'm not sure what, if anything, ad hominem argument has to do with oral sodomy.

To argue with their output, one needs to pick apart their logic, lingustics and textology, not their biographies.

I'm not sure what "textology" is, either.

The author of the article is not mentioning their biases in order to refute their arguments - he is mentioning their biases to demonstrate that the media is obssessively one-sided in their coverage.

His point is that we have seven so-called experts who all take a view antithetical to that of orthodox Christianity while not one scholar is there to take the other side of the argument.

What was the name of that islamic professor whose best argument was "you are a heretic"?

You realize, of course, that this itself is a form of the ad hominem argument?

14 posted on 04/24/2006 1:54:27 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This wouldnt be the first time NG put their agenda ahead of accuracy.


15 posted on 04/24/2006 1:55:59 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Democrats: soulless minions of orthodoxy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
I doubt you are going to find many "pro-canonical" Biblical scholars who are going to be interested in participating with a TV special that hypes a work that contradicts the traditional Bible.

You would be able to find plenty.

The reason why they were not included was that they are not invited - because any Christian scholar would be able to blow holes in these heterodox arguments wide enough to drive a Mack truck through.

I'm not a scholar, although I have a far superior theological background to Pagels' and also am more knowledgeable about the source languages than she is. I would have loved to have been able to get a few zingers in, and I doubt that I am alone.

16 posted on 04/24/2006 1:59:32 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Do you notice that they always release their madeup pseudo bs right before Holy Week?

These "scholars" are so biased, nothing they say or write can really begin to be trusted. Unfortunately, the average person who is not knowledgeable (especially young people) will see this crap and accept it as truth.
17 posted on 04/24/2006 2:01:25 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

They couldn't wait to bring this and the Mary Magdelene was Jesus' wife and they had children stuff out at Eastertime. Big slap in the face. It's all about destroying Christianity, the Roman Catholic Church/religion. Secular humanism triumphant. PC multiculturalism/moral relativism, communism the list is endless and disgusting.


18 posted on 04/24/2006 2:06:54 PM PDT by hershey (nli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
"Ad hominem arguments are fellatious"

Was that misspelling a Freudian slip?
19 posted on 04/24/2006 2:07:59 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer; kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul; Raquel; Tax-chick
Amy Jill Levine, a member of pro-abortion feminist groups as well as the Anti-Defamation League.  She believes Christians have been generally anti-Semitic since the time of Jesus, as evidenced in a talk she gave entitled, “Christians say the craziest things (about Jews).”  

Like what?... I have been a Catholic Christian all my life and I don't recall anyone who is devout in their faith say anything that disparages the Jewish people.

But I guess Amy can call Christians anything she'd like. Sounds like a double standard to me.

20 posted on 04/24/2006 2:10:49 PM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson