Posted on 04/25/2006 5:59:02 AM PDT by Millicent_Hornswaggle
Is Boortz running for something? Dam I thought not!
He may be my write in candidate in November with common sense solutions like these.
So many logical thinkers are accurate on immigration, but our politicians keep their head in the sand. The President is so far off on this issue it's embarrasing. 3/4 of Congress would just America would shut up and swallow the amnesty pill.
Agree with substance of your post, but do we really want to reward those who have broken/evaded our laws the longest?
Doesn't that send a message: "We aren't really serious: if you
`game' our system long enough, you will win in the end."
The President can do a lot of things that can be criticized, but his position on the "wet back" invasion shows a complete lack of disconnect with those who have supported him. He is at 33% approval now. Stand back, that will look good in the coming weeks when new lows are set.
It is difficult to believe that his advisors, including the omnipotent Carl Rove can be so wrong on this issue of wetbacks flooding the country.
The country wants a program of deportation back to their country of origin starting right now. Obviously Mexico is exporting its poor, diseased, pregnant, mentally deprived and criminals into the country.
Indict the companies who knowingly hire illegals and start putting them in prison, not fining them and low and behold, the problem will start to disappear.
Well I am done with all of them. Everytime they open their mouths about "comprehensive" reform or "jobs Americans won't do" I just gag.
I cannot vote for anyone that makes me gag.
That seems pretty common sense to me.
Agreed, that logistically, shipping 11 - 15 million illegals back to their country of origin would be a challenge. A much smaller number would be quite manageable and the number I'm thinking of is 536, consisting of 1 President, 100 Senators and 435 Representatives.
Who here believes that 536 is an unmanageable number?
Who here doesn't see the ridiculous situation where 536 men and women are holding 300 million Americans in contempt, imposing their selfish motives on us in order to retain their part time elected office and power. Such arrogance should be rewarded with a boot to the rear and lifetime banishment from public office.
If you want to know Boortz thoughts on the subject, ask him. Do not presume to put words in his mouth though. Especially with your track record of having only the loosest of associations with anything resembling "truth" or "facts".
Do you find flaw in the plan?
How much credibility does President Bush have when he says we are enforcing U.S. borders?
60-100 percent
1%
183 votes
20-59 percent
1%
142 votes
Zero-19 percent
9%
1720 votes
Less than Zero
89%
16075 votes
Total: 18120 votes
POLL: http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/
Ping.
All those illegal Mexicans with UK transfer accounts would probably be a problem with taxing the transfers to Mexico.
I swear Vicente Fox must have photos of George Bush having sex with farm animals. Nothing else can explain Bush's stupid position on this. If we ever did create the conditions you describe which would cause these illegals to "self-deport", what do you want to bet that Fox would have his troops on the border refusing to allow his own citizens back into their own country?
How do you know Boortz is pro-abortion?
He has said it many times on his radio program, he is also pro-gay marriage.
Again, agree with the substance of your post,
but, again, that's what was said back in `86.
They talk about getting the invaders' promises to obey the law, fining them, out of the country for a while, they come back, pay another fine, then play `musical chairs', etc. etc. Meanwhile, real `immigrants' are playing by the rules.
Here's something that even Washington DC `pin-heads' can understand and implement: build an effective wall. They will continue to `flood' us if we are giving amnesty (sorry, but that's what it is) to this second wave.
Or we could just enforce the law. If Mexican foreign nationals are here in violation of our immigration laws, march them back south, the way they came.
If you are a "liberal", or have an illegal gardener or maid, you probably find these to be bad ideas. Of course the Democrats' `solution' is to pass more laws.
"The hell with their campaign contributions."
____________________________________________________
Here is your only problem in an otherwise excellent plan.
Follow da money, honey.
No he hasn't. He is adamantly opposed to speaking about abortion on the program. It's policy, and anytime someone wants to talk about it, he stops them. And he's not so much pro-gay marriage as he is apathetic. He sees nothing wrong with two folks entering into a contractual relationship with one another. He's specifically said it shouldn't be called "marriage".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.