Posted on 04/25/2006 5:59:02 AM PDT by Millicent_Hornswaggle
Did you get the above from the "Clinton handbook on parsing".
Boortz is pro-abortion.
If you ever want to see a perfect example of a former president living the good life, take a drive along the coast of Maine. When you get a mile or two north of Kennebunkport, be prepared to see the most eye-poppong, jaw dropping view of the most beautiful home and property on the east coast. This place has been in the Bush family for at least 2 generations, maybe 3 and is a classic statement of the American Dream of what a driven family can accomplish. I hope it stays in the family and is never turned into a museum.
Lame. I'm not parsing anything, I'm stating the facts. Your tap dance looks like "parsing" to me. Do you refute that Boortz does not speak of abortion on his program? It's policy that the topic is ignored. I'll ask you again. How do you know Boortz is pro-abortion?
BUMP
The current alien invasion from the south serves BOTH the elites who run Mexico and the political ruling class who increasingly run the United States:
· It takes pressure off the 25 families who control approximately 80% of the wealth in Mexico. Without the northern safety valve (the United States) for their poor, those poor MIGHT be inclined to do what Americas early colonists found it necessary to do: Revolt! Parenthetically, that would be MY suggestion for them: Instead of fleeing here and converting here to a larger, more poverty infested version of there, they ought to stay there and make there into their version of here, whatever that would be. Revolutions ARE messy and there are no guarantees that they will produce the desired result. But according to one T. Jefferson they are often necessary. Never forget that THIS country was born in revolution!
· For the NAFTA/CAFTA coveting US national ruling class especially those who, in varying degrees, quest after some sort of One-World utopia run by guess who? it provides yet another level of insecurity and tension among the indigenous populace which can be used to justify new and more draconian limits to freedom here. Instead of securing the borders, allow millions of illegals to come in and when the natives become alarmed, require a national ID card. Your papers, please! will soon become a phrase familiar to all. Its Mr. Franklins trade of freedom for (false) security. Its also the time-tested Hegelian Dialectic the One-Worlders have successfully worked like a rented mule.
While they occasionally squabble among themselves, the elites of history have ALL had one thing in common: They will do ANYTHING to remain in charge. And throughout that history, except for the 230 year-old experiment in freedom called America, most of the men who have walked the earth have lived as slaves to these elites whether they call themselves kings, emperors, potentates, sultans, czars or presidents.
Get ready, folks. Unless some SERIOUS changes are made and the handful of Americans who CARE about liberty get involved, that history will almost certainly repeat here.
THE LAW DOES NOT NEED TO BE CHANGED....we've been conned...if parents are illegals, children born to them ARE NOT LEGAL CITIZENS.
THE FRAUD OF ANCHOR BABIES
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Friday, 21 April 2006
The myth of Birthright Citizenship is one of the more extraordinary frauds committed in America today. Liberals insist that the "Citizenship Clause" of the 14th Amendment - which states "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside" - means that children of illegal aliens born on US soil automatically are US citizens.
The 14th Amendment means no such thing. When it was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves, the Citizenship Clause's author, Senator Jacob Howard, made it explicitly clear that the clause did not apply to "persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States."
This can -- and does: Building a North American Community.
Using the National Guard to secure the borders is a very good idea. Every unit trains every year -- just make the permanent training area the border and rotate the units year-round. Guard members get to train in warm-weather areas, we can get the "wall" built fairly quickly with many hands to do the work, and the border is well-manned and protected all year long.
But this idea takes balls and a sense of resolve, and there are few politicians in place to enact it that have them from W on down!
This is a commen sense idea that would work. Unfortunately neither RINOs or leftests want anything to do with it. One has to wonder when the president is siding with extreme leftests and racist organizations against the laws and will of the American people.
It is also obviously suspicious that the pres never uses the term illegal regarding those here illegally only that they are migrants no different than you and I? One only has to wonder what is the payoff is for destroying this country like the pres and the RINOs seem to be willing to do.
It's a sane proposal, which means it will never reach Washington. Piss on politicians.
I wonder how much we've spent on defending the Korea border(to include minefields!) as compared to our own damn borders.
At least you're always consistently on the wrong side of every issue.
I'd add only property owners get to vote/donate. they have the most vested interest in defending America.
Right. That's coherent.
There are 5500 immigration agents. Do something about that.
...but Mexico is Vicente Fox's problem, and he should be ashamed of himself for not trying to fix it!
No sorrow here--they need to do something about their problems, just as we are trying to do something. Wonder how far we will get?
The Airforce needs to practice "touch and goes" in the Dominican Republic and P.R.
Uh but to numberonepally there, boortz refuses to talk about abortion.
And yet... you seem to know so much about his opinion on the matter. How is it that you came by such a definative declaration of Neal's beliefs again? You just admitted that he refuses to talk about it, so how did you come by your info?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.