Flowchart For McCarthy-Priest-Goodfellow-Et Alia
Posted on 04/26/2006 10:55:39 AM PDT by Sam Hill
McCarthy in Denial
By The Prowler
4/26/2006 12:08:54 AM
Outed CIA analyst Mary McCarthy is denying through her lawyers that she was the source for the Washington Post's Dana Priest in revealing the secret prisons that housed terrorists overseas. McCarthy's lawyers, though, aren't throwing cold water on the notion that McCarthy may have had political inclinations and agendas that came into play with what even they termed unauthorized or undisclosed contacts with journalists.
Perhaps that's why the Howard Dean and others at the Democrat National Committee are looking to some of their donors to set up a legal defense fund for McCarthy.
"If Scooter Libby can have a legal defense fund and website, then McCarthy should have one too," says a DNC staffer. "The DNC wouldn't set it up, we'd have some of our donors do it on the outside. There are plenty of consultants willing to help on this one, we think." ...
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Fired CIA Officer Likely Won't Face Charges Over Leak
Former colleagues described her as cautious and respected. "I thought she was a competent, quiet, good intelligence officer," said Richard J. Kerr, a former deputy CIA director who worked with McCarthy. "She was certainly someone you had respect for and saw not as an ideologue or someone who would end up putting herself in this position."
I'd hate to see what would have happened if she was political.
A "McCarthy is not political" ping.
The DNC will be supporting someone being charged (possibly) with leaking state secrets involving our war against terrorists.
DNC--PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEASE DO THIS!
Let the DNC use their funds for McCarthy. The GOP can let the legal system bankrupt them...save our funds for 2008
Justice is dead...
Scooter's site isn't put up by the RNC.
Go for it Dean
Wrap your slimy little arms around this traitor
Here's, perhaps, why they will do this and more: http://macsmind.blogspot.com/
Curious, WHY are the Democrats all rushing to Mary's defense?
My, it is so interesting that the DNC immediately assumes..... i.e., KNOWS, that she is on "their team" and they must arrange her legal defense fund (with as few fingerprints as possible, naturally). This supposedly non-partisan professional (HA HA) is instantly embraced by the DNC......... how revealing is THAT?
VERY revealing !
Just exchanged email with a liberal friend who defended her with the usual "speaking truth to power" arguments. He was glad she "spoke out" about torture in secret prisons. Because I objected to her law-breaking, I was, ergo in favor of torture. And that THIS administration needs to learn how to deal with dissent. I feel like I was tortured.
Sort of sounds like the neighbors talking about the really quiet, friendly guy next door after a dozen bodies are found buried in his basement.
Hint: Moles, spies and saboteurs always do their best to "blend in" and look normal.
See link at #8. Makes a lot of sense, no?
Two big differences tootz. Libby's defense fund was not spearheaded by Ken Mehlman and "set up" by the RNC. Secondly, Libby's position was, by definition, political whereas McCarthy's is necessarily NOT.
She did great damage. Why would anyone defend her?
Intresting, thank you.
Isn't it? Most welcome. I've kind of been spamming these threads with it as it does make sense. See you around (gotta get some work done)..
Without further comment, this is totally appropriate --- freedom of speech, and all that.
Just as is the organization of a McCarthy prosecution fund...
Doesn't say much for his predictive or analytic abilities, does it?
DNC.....MAKE MY DAY......defend the CIA leaker!
"Outed CIA analyst Mary McCarthy..."
The media loves that term "outed."
Liberals run on feelings... Laws and facts are of no use to them.
YES. PLEASE do it and remove any doubt that McCarthy was a DNC operative trying to destroy Bush and his foreign policy (ie, sedition).
Curious, WHY are the Democrats all rushing to Mary's defense?
Is that a trick question?
LOL
They want her to be the victim.
"She did great damage. Why would anyone defend her?"
Because they revel in that great damage?
Just part of the traitorous democrat party organized crime gang.
My all time favorite image!
I will bet anyone a crisp clean $100.00 bill that if investigated thoroughly, this will trace back to the Kerry campaign. Look how many of the players were involved in his campaign, and were probably promised appointments if he would have won.
Kerry is in this up to his neck.
"Liberals run on feelings... Laws and facts are of no use to them."
Bingo! I'd love to see them set up a defense fund for her. They'll look like idiots, trying to defend their position.
Tell your liberal friend that has not been established, just speculation by talking heads, that McCarthy leaked the "secret overseas prisons" where alleged torture was conducted.
Furthermore, It has not been confirmed by the CIA that secret prisons ever existed. The EU Intelligence office, investigated, and could not find any evidence that any secret prison existed.
The CIA claims McCarthy leaked classified info. and made unauthorized contacts with reporters. The CIA moreover claim she even admitted to releasing classified while being interrogated, after failing polygraph test(s).
That's a great graphic. LoL!
Beautiful Chart. My head hurt when I was plowing through that stuff. I'm assuming you have the Tides Foundation tie to the Center for International Policy and Terreza and the rest of the rats nest.
Click the link. It will take you to a thread where the original poster is working on something more extensive.
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!! Someone has to post this over at the DUmpster. All 10 of them will stroke out on the spot!
Just heard the CIA may not prosecute because they don't want to discuss what was leaked in open court. :-(
"McCarthy's lawyers..." doesn't name them. Could they be the same lawyers that are defending the other traitors, the Clintons?
Anyone who advances this argument doesn't have the brainpower to work in intelligence, and should be fired immediately.
By definition, the traitor has already leaked all of it to God knows who, so it's a moot --- and very dumb --- point.
D'OH!
Isn't this a similar problem as with Padilla?
She knows where the bodies are buried.
Re#34 I wouldn't take that bet. Heck, Joe Wilson was on staff. Thank heavens they didn't win...
Democrats = Culture of Treason.
Pass it on.
hehe... type "culture of treason" in your favorite search engine...
Oddly enough, the FEC has no records of any contributions from him to the GOP. They do, however list these:
JOHNSON, LARRY
BETHESDA, MD 20817DEAN, HOWARD
VIA DEAN FOR AMERICA
12/27/2003 311.00 24990407496JOHNSON, LARRY C
BETHESDA, MD 20817
BERG AND ASSOCIATES/MANAGING MEMBMARCINKOWSKI, JAMES
VIA MARCINKOWSKI FOR CONGRESS
12/19/2005 2000.00 26980097211
The second one is definitely from our boy, Larry. It is for a Democrat who trained with Johnson and Plame at the CIA.
And he is almost as rabid as Larry about the (non-leak) leak of her (non-covert) desk jockey job at CIA.
Marcinkowski for Congress
http://www.marcinkowskiforcongress.com/index.asp
To be fair, the Dean contribution could be from some other Larry Johnson in that zip code. But what are the odds?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.