Skip to comments.
ROVE "NOT A TARGET" OF CIA LEAK INVESTIGATION
National Review ^
| Byron York
Posted on 04/26/2006 2:41:09 PM PDT by slowhand520
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: cardinal4
Joe Wilson leaked classified info to "hold the Administration accountable". You see, when a liberal "leaks" to hurt a conservative, it is whistle-blowing.
When a conservative "leaks" to hurt a liberal, it is against the law.
21
posted on
04/26/2006 2:50:13 PM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: Dilbert56
And I bet the DUmmies are about ready to explode. Will not be a pretty site or sight!
They have been waiting and waiting to frog-march Rove. What great news.
22
posted on
04/26/2006 2:51:09 PM PDT
by
KittyFL
(Enough is enough)
To: COEXERJ145
Typical MSM distortion of the facts.It's what they want to be true that matters, not what IS true.
23
posted on
04/26/2006 2:52:39 PM PDT
by
umgud
(don't ever, ever let your invaders become voters)
To: Gordongekko909
You should see the thread over there from Raw Story (I think) where they quote some article from a writer who said his "sources" close to the investigation said a target letter had been sent to Rove. Another poster questioned the credibility of the writer and got the crap beat out of him. One poster, I think it was Pitt, even said he had checked everything out before putting up the article on his site and everything was fine.
They're just so dang entertaining!
To: Mo1
Thanks for the ping.
This is going to drive the Wilsons et al, completely round the bend! LOL
To: slowhand520
My first thought is, "you can't believe a damn thing a lawyer says on TV".
My second thought is, "the truth changes".
But I do trust Byron York in whatever he writes, so just call me, uncharacteristically but cheerfully, cautious.
26
posted on
04/26/2006 2:53:01 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: Kenny Bunkport
"For sure. One of these days the MSM is going to spin so quickly that they'll all explode. I look forward to that day."
Either that or spin out into outerspace.
27
posted on
04/26/2006 2:53:48 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: shield
It means he'll keep trying.
28
posted on
04/26/2006 2:55:17 PM PDT
by
Krodg
To: jennyjenny
Yeah, I saw the "target letter" threads and skipped over them. I wanted to see what the DUmmies were saying about this specifically.
29
posted on
04/26/2006 2:55:35 PM PDT
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: Mo1
30
posted on
04/26/2006 2:55:40 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(Once a Snowflake, always a Snowflake ! Good luck Tony!)
To: Swanks
Matthews won't get even 1 news cycle out of this
Sure he will...he'll smirk and say "Karl Rove's attorney claims that Rove is not a target".
31
posted on
04/26/2006 2:58:45 PM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: Howlin; kcvl; ravingnutter; Fedora; Laverne; the Real fifi; Lancey Howard; Enchante; Mo1; Peach; ...
From the ever nauseating,
"Karl Rove's return to the grand jury today could mean the end of the Rove investigation or the beginning of the Rove prosecution. It depends on who asked Rove to return. If Fitzgerald asked Rove to return to the grand jury, that means Fitzgerald thinks he doesn't have enough for an indictment.
If Rove asked to return to the grand jury, that means Rove's lawyer, Bob Luskin, believes an indictment is imminent and is sending his client back to make a final desperate attempt to avoid indictment.
Luskin did this once before when he told Fitzgerald about the Viveca Novak connection, which is certainly going to be covered in Rove's testimony today. Luskin has experienced extreme mood swings in his willingness to talk to the press about this case. If a reporter can ask him one question today, it should be who asked Rove to return to the grand jury?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm also wondering what the bottomline is of this vague statement:
"Karl Rove appeared today before the grand jury investigating the disclosure of a CIA agent's identity. He testified voluntarily and unconditionally at the request of special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to explore a matter raised since Mr. Rove's last appearance in October 2005. In connection with this appearance, the special counsel has advised Mr. Rove that he is not a target of the investigation. Mr. Fitzgerald has affirmed that he has made no decisions regarding charges. At the request of the special counsel, Mr. Rove will not discuss the substance of his testimony."
33
posted on
04/26/2006 3:00:54 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
To: slowhand520
34
posted on
04/26/2006 3:01:25 PM PDT
by
Soul Seeker
("No Illegal Alien Left Behind Act" - (quote: Jeff Sessions) - 4/6/06)
To: cardinal4; A Citizen Reporter; AliVeritas; alnick; AmericaUnited; Anti-Bubba182; arasina; ...
Scooter Ping - Rove Not A Target Ping!I bet the DUmmies are FURIOUS!
35
posted on
04/26/2006 3:04:27 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: slowhand520
The DUmmies at DU are all living DemNarnia, Fitzmas will never come.
36
posted on
04/26/2006 3:05:29 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Marine_Uncle
L/MSM are going to go into high gear on this one to come up with some off thw wall spin for the minions. I won't celebrate until Fitz holds another news conference attacking the real villains in this trumped up bullshite circle jerk.
37
posted on
04/26/2006 3:07:42 PM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
To: Soul Seeker
"Still no Fitzmas? LOL!"LOL is right. The DUmb*sses were wetting themselves on this today. Citing Olberman, they speculated that Rove asked to go back the the GJ to save himself. They are such a silly lot...
38
posted on
04/26/2006 3:08:32 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
To: Howlin
I bet that heads are exploding, over at DU, right now. LOL
To: Howlin
40
posted on
04/26/2006 3:09:36 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Kerry-Mcarthy in 2008!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson