Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Obit] Julia Thorne, at 61; author, activist was ex-wife of Senator Kerry
boston.com ^ | April 28, 2006 | By Mark Feeney

Posted on 04/28/2006 7:16:29 AM PDT by cloud8

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: cloud8

"She was a phenomenal mother"

I don't know. From what I have seen of her daughters, I haven't been that impressed.

I don't care how old my daughter is. If she had shown up to an event with her boobies showing, I would have given her what for.


21 posted on 04/28/2006 7:51:56 AM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
In 1982 Thorne, who was suffering from severe depression, asked Kerry for a separation. They were divorced on July 25, 1988

That should have cleared it up, non?

22 posted on 04/28/2006 7:53:00 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Oh, Kerry was broke all right. From a past FR post...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173324/posts :



From a larger, 6 part story on Kerry from the Boston Globe:

"Kerry's personal life, meanwhile, was becoming increasingly tumultuous. He had separated from his first wife, Julia Thorne, in 1982, and the divorce became final in 1988. For much of their marriage, Julia, who came from a wealthy Long Island family, had provided significant financial contributions. The divorce left Kerry strapped for cash and looking for ways to meet child-support payments, campaign debts, and tuition costs.

(snip)
"Kerry acknowledges money "was tight" for him in those days. "I was spending all I had," he says. Regarding honoraria, which Congress banned in 1991, Kerry says: "I did not take honoraria from anyone who had anything in front of my committee."

"Kerry also signed on as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the fund-raising arm for Senate Democrats, for the 1987-1988 cycle. This would help him tap the network of national Democratic donors.

"Kerry's current wife, Teresa Heinz, calls the late 1980s his "gypsy period." For months at a time he had no fixed address and crashed instead with his daughters when Julia was away or with Julia's brother David."


23 posted on 04/28/2006 7:54:40 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
But look how J F'n K shut off, or cut down, his alimony to Julia...from above:

"Kerry and Thorne finalized their divorce in 1988... After Thorne requested an increase in alimony in 1995, Kerry sought an annulment of their marriage from the Catholic Church, a move observers saw as retaliatory. Kerry eventually received the annulment from the Boston diocese despite Thorne’s vehement objections." The marriage was formally annulled by the Roman Catholic Church in 1997.

Not sure if he was responsible to keep paying alimony after the marriage was annuled...

24 posted on 04/28/2006 7:57:20 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Yes...I find him grotesque. How anyone could find him attractive is beyond me.


25 posted on 04/28/2006 7:59:46 AM PDT by DesignerChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
"They say he was broke until he married Theresa Heinz."

I would argue that he will remain broke for the rest of his life, regardless of the size of his accounts.

26 posted on 04/28/2006 8:00:59 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
”he was married before he was divorced?”

His marriage was annulled.

That means in John Kerry’s mind he was married before he wasn't married.

27 posted on 04/28/2006 8:01:58 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

The church annuled it, not the state.


28 posted on 04/28/2006 8:02:52 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DesignerChick
Yes...I find him grotesque. How anyone could find him attractive is beyond me.

Many find him quite attractive.


29 posted on 04/28/2006 8:04:51 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Yes!

I knew MY little brain couldn't wrap itself around the nuance of John Forbes Thorne Gomez Ferrari Heinz.... or whatever else he calls himself....

Let's just call him "Dipstick".


30 posted on 04/28/2006 8:04:57 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
She's so pretty! She must have been blinded with love to marry that qhoul.

More likely blinded by left wing political fervor, which she, like other groupies, misinterpreted as love. JFnK of course was blinded by the dollar signs.

31 posted on 04/28/2006 8:05:18 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

ah---right.


32 posted on 04/28/2006 8:06:08 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Not sure if he was responsible to keep paying alimony after the marriage was annuled...

Totally separate matters. The alimony would have stemmed from the civil divorce, the annulment is a matter of the Church's recognition of the marriage. Without the annulment, they were still married in the eyes of the Church, despite the civil divorce.

33 posted on 04/28/2006 8:07:10 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dead
Only for people who look for love on www.MeHarmony.com


34 posted on 04/28/2006 8:07:20 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Unfortunately, many women are 'blinded' by gigolos and professional con-artists (like John Kerry).


35 posted on 04/28/2006 8:07:25 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

"John Kerry was married before he wasn't married."

ROFLMAO!!


36 posted on 04/28/2006 8:12:25 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Yup, but I wonder if he tried to get himself off of paying alimony by claiming "hey, the Church said my marriage never
really happened..." (Probably not but I'll bet the thought crossed his mind)


37 posted on 04/28/2006 8:17:57 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
FIRST, thoughts and prayers to her family.

The question that may be heartless and,to use a recent term, "too soon", but must be asked, is that since her death was caused by a "cell"-related condition, how long will it take for the Left (be it a Democrat or Republican) to ramp up the language about stem-cell research, and to make it a campaign issue (again)?

Especially considering that Ms. Thorne was the wife of one of the most prominent Leftists in our government, and ran as such in his FAILED campaign for president?

38 posted on 04/28/2006 8:20:13 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh: kevlar protection from the Drive-By Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

don't make me sick. Kerry is most likely bald under that mop. They guy is such a fake.


39 posted on 04/28/2006 8:21:04 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Good morning.
"Kerry eventually received the annulment from the Boston diocese despite Thorne’s vehement objections." [41] The marriage was formally annulled by the Roman Catholic Church in 1997."

Does anyone know what grounds the Catholic Church used to decide that a marriage that they had confirmed, and that had produced children, didn't exist anymore?

Michael Frazier
40 posted on 04/28/2006 8:26:30 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson