Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J
In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.
Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.
The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.
Isn't it about time the world got rid of these sub-human vermin?? Once and for all.
Does anybody think they won't if we don't?
Will they nuke San Fransisco, New York, Los Angeles and other terrorist friendly cities?
Bomb without fear.
The only "variable" in the Terrorist Nuke equation is what excuse they will use with their buddies in the MSM. Iran works fine, so does any number of Pali/Hamas issues, presence in Afganistan and/or Iraq also works...
Why would AQ wait for us to attack Iran to use nukes? If they had 'em, they'd have surely used 'em by now.
How many times is this "smuggled nukes" nonsense going to be predicted?
If al-Qaeda had the capability to use nukes in the US, they would have already used them.
Their top people are getting picked off, weekly. They're losing strength. They're done in Iraq.
al-Qaeda may be TRYING to secure nuclear weapons or dirty nuclear material, but they don't have it. Read Richard Miniter's book!!
"Does anybody think they won't if we don't?"
Terrorists don't have nukes- at an absolute minimum they would have shown off pictures of them if they had them.
And Iran won't be able to give nukes to terrorists for use against the US without having the Persian race removed from the face of the earth in retaliation. One good thing about nukes is that you can tell after the explosion where the nukes were made based on tell-tale radioactive isotopes left over.
Once Iran gets nukes it will be a lot like Pakistan- they will just have them. And life will go on. If they ever do use them, it will most likely be against Israel- they have no missiles capable of reaching the US.
However, the word needs to get back to them, if they use nukes against us, we will turn all of the Muslim world... ALL OF IT... into a wasteland, starting with Mecca, Qom, Tehran, Damascus, etc.
They may have nukes, and the supplies to keep them mostly up to spec.
The question is, will attacking Iran trigger an assault by them? I doubt it. It'll be random and a bolt from the blue style massive attack.
Until he gets it right or people finally ignore him enough to make him go away.
Perhaps they're just waiting for the right sort of 'target rich' envrironment. Something like, say, hundreds of thousands of people out in the streets of a large number of major cities all at the same time?
What is it with Muslim males and the need to bluster. It must been genetic. They all have to pop off at the mouth with these grandiose threats and yet they all seem to end up as empty blather from Failureworld.
Saddam took the cake with his threat of "THE MOTHER OF ALL BATTLES" while getting his a$$ handed to him in less than 4 days but the Iranian nutjob is making a run at him.
If necessary, bomb the hell out of them and ignore the empty threats.
That ain't going to happen.
Then we will nuke Iran and Pakistan. Club members paying dues.
Believe me, I've noticed. Everything is a confrontation to these guys. They think that everyone around them is trying to one-up them.
They'll use nukes 5 minutes after they get them. Port security has a 3% of catching them.
..is that before or after the giant spiders are unloaded from the mothership?
They may not be good at much, but they are patient and do know how to wait until their plan can have a maximum shock effect. What better way than to threaten the top superpower in the world with nukes if we attack Iran.
Now if we don't attack Iran they can claim to have stood up to us and caused us to back down.
If America does attack Iran and they set off nukes in our major cities (D.C., NYC, LA, etc.) and cause mass panic and chaos in the country, they show that they are capable of carrying out their threats.
Granted the Middle East may glow in the dark, if they did do something like that, but we are not at war with a rational people. Just MHO. - OB1
You said -- "Terrorists don't have nukes- at an absolute minimum they would have shown off pictures of them if they had them."
Hmmm..., I'm trying to remember the pictures of planes crashing into buildings that they showed us before they did it...
So..., you don't think they have operational secrecy, huh?
That's an interesting war they are running. They first show us pictures of their weapons. Then they tell us where they are going to do it. And then, they just walk right in and pull it off.
If they were that stupid, we wouldn't have two big buildings down.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Maybe it's because by simply existing, everybody around them one-ups them because they're vermin?
Now, now, we must not upset the liberals by calling for the extension of their "friends" in the middle east. We must be more tolerant. We must understand why they hate us. We must not judge them harshly. We must love them, cuddle them, give them money, ask their forgiveness, etc. We must not fear them. They simply want to be our friends. (sarcasm still on).
Will they then expect the reverse to happen; that if someone uses a nuclear device in the U.S., we'll obliterate Iran?
Now there is a country in the world threatening over and over and over to use NUCLEAR WEAPONS on their enemies, and the anti-war, pacifist, anti-nuclear lefties are mute.
And just what do they think the result will be? Lets start a contest on what to call the sand pile we used to call Iran.
Not everywhere. Seems that is part of the problem.
If they ever do use them, it will most likely be against Israel-
Oh, well, if that's all...
That's just OK then?
This is prisonplanet.com fantasy.
If they possess nukes, and have the capability to bring them in, then they will nuke the US whether Iran is attacked or not.
You said -- "However, the word needs to get back to them, if they use nukes against us, we will turn all of the Muslim world... ALL OF IT... into a wasteland, starting with Mecca, Qom, Tehran, Damascus, etc."
I still don't see (when people mention this option) what kind of deterrence that has. Most of the people in those places you mentioned have no ideas what is going on. They are not involved in operations. They don't fight in the wars and so on. They couldn't stop a single terrorist operation if they tried. So, I fail to understand what they have to do with it.
Now, on the other hand, I think the religion of Islam should be destroyed. That's another matter. I think we can destroy that and allow those people (the millions of current Muslims) find another religion. It's an evil religion and that religion needs to be destroyed, because it's a Satanic religion and it has them enslaved (just as the Bible points out that Satan enslaves and oppresses others through his lies and guile and deception). That's Islam for you.
The people are one thing and the religion is another.
By the way, if you start bombing these other areas because of the Muslims there -- you are going to have to bomb larges areas of the United States, too. If you don't, then there is no consistency to your reasoning.
Regards,
Star Traveler
This is senseless fear mongering at its worst.
I don't know whether they can get functioning nukes into America. I do believe, however, that they would have used them by now if they already have them here.
"Once Iran gets nukes it will be a lot like Pakistan- they will just have them. And life will go on. "
No, they will launch a conventional attack against Israel with Syria and Hamas joining the fray.
If Al Qaeda does use nukes, what would our excuse be for nuking Iran, Mecca or Damascus? The best we could do is nuke what we think is Al Qaeda's hideout...which is in Pakistan.
If we get it, we won't be able to do a damn thing that we haven't done already.
I'm talking about Arab-Americans here. It's like Napoleon Complex spread out across an entire culture. It's nowhere near as big a problem with second- and third-generation Arabs, but the ones who just came over are jerks.
Nuke goes off in NY, or Dallas or New Orleans, etc., and I guarantee you that there will be nuclear retaliation against any identified source within 90 minutes, max.
Nuke goes off in such a way as to take out the President or any significant portion of our government and there will be a general bombardment of that entire region.
Nuke goes off anywhere on the planet and marshal law will be declared, all potential enemies will be warned to not approach our assets anywhere in any way, shape or form, and no ship, plane or any other form of transportation will be allowed within 50 miles of our borders.
Oh, and troops will be deployed with shoot to kill orders at all borders and ports.
But Hillary supports a fence on the border...
You can say that again! This is why security needs to be made paramount (and I don't mean wanding old ladies at the airport), otherwise the GOP risks going the way of the Whigs should a terrorist bring in a nuke (it wouldn't matter BTW if it came via our border with Canada, with Mexico, or through shipping ports).
"They may not be good at much, but they are patient and do know how to wait until their plan can have a maximum shock effect."
October this year. Followed by a Democrat call that Bush hasn't protected us from Terror.
If they had 'em they would have used them by now.
Why don't we shut these fools up already?
You said -- "Perhaps they're just waiting for the right sort of 'target rich' envrironment. Something like, say, hundreds of thousands of people out in the streets of a large number of major cities all at the same time?"
They also may be looking for a "connecting event" in the Middle East. In other words, this sort of thing may be sprung on the U.S. at the same time that several countries invade Israel. It might be designed to keep the "enemy" (in their eyes) busy at home, while they do the "elimination of Israel" thing that they are so intent on doing.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Believe me, I've noticed. Everything is a confrontation to these guys. They think that everyone around them is trying to one-up them.
I guess 1200 years of little accomplishment as compared to the rest of the world makes them a bit insecure and thin-skinned. IMHO that's why they hate Israel so much. It's a daily, in-you-face reminder that the Israelis accomplished in 30 or 40 years what the Muzzies haven't been able to in 1200. Hence the need to puff themselves up by loosing empty threats at everyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.