Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Father of the Bush Doctrine George Shultz on pre-emption and the Revolt of the Generals.
Opinion Journal ^ | April 29, 2006 | BY DANIEL HENNINGER

Posted on 04/29/2006 3:16:26 AM PDT by aculeus

SAN FRANCISCO--George P. Shultz was the secretary of state of the United States during the years that the Soviet Union was led, successively, by Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov, Konstantin Chernenko and Mikhail Gorbachev. During those years, 1982 to 1989, the United States was led by Ronald Reagan. At the end of our interview, as he was showing me out of his apartment, Mr. Shultz invited me to stop in the dining room. "I want you to see something," he said. We walked over to a table. "Have a look at that. It arrived in the mail the other day." It looked like a polished brass cylinder, open at either end. It was the 14th artillery shell from the 21-gun salute at Ronald Reagan's funeral in 2004. "Isn't that something?"

George Shultz is an intellectual, an MIT economist who in his career held two other cabinet posts, labor and Treasury, under Richard Nixon. And clearly he is awed by Ronald Reagan, the "actor" President, and the years he spent serving as Reagan's minister to the world. But I had come to San Francisco because I wanted to talk about the here and now. So did he. Above all, the Revolt of the Generals and the leaks out of the CIA. He's upset.

"I always had a good experience dealing with the career people in government," Mr. Shultz said. "But I have to say it's almost as if there is an insurrection taking place. Particularly what is going on in the military is astonishing and fundamentally intolerable. There has to be a sense of discipline. This is something new, and for everybody's good it has to be dealt with."

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrine; cfr; generals; georgeshultz; revoltofthegenerals; ronaldreagan; rumsfeld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2006 3:16:31 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I spoke to two retired Air Force Generals this week. One was a retired Major General (2-star) and one was a retired Lieutenant General (3-star). One had worked in close proximity to Secretary Rumsfeld while on the Joint Staff.

Both of them told me that, while this "revolt" is somewhat driven by concern for the way the war is being managed, they both believed the primary motivation behind it was these men had a score to settle with Rumsfeld.

The one who wore 3-stars admitted that most Generals have an ego that is....well, colossal.

Rumsfeld takes and took no guff as Secretary. He said he saw many occasions where Rumsfeld backhanded general officers at meetings and he gave direct and specific orders. If they were not carried out, God help you.

2 posted on 04/29/2006 3:57:56 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

they both believed the primary motivation behind it was these men had a score to settle with Rumsfeld.

Not to mention that they were probably all Clinton appointed Generals.


3 posted on 04/29/2006 4:03:26 AM PDT by chainsaw (We are going to take things away from you-H. Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Generation-X Generals I guess, or worse.


4 posted on 04/29/2006 4:05:39 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Brown nosers of another general---- Wesley Clark.


5 posted on 04/29/2006 4:11:10 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Excellent piece- I read the whole article.

These generals have an over-inflated view of themselves that is unsettling.


6 posted on 04/29/2006 4:17:57 AM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Most people do not remember that when Rumsfeld started, he set out to change the military from a slow, ground-based behemoth designed to fight the Soviet Union into a more mobile, tactical unit.

Rumsfeld was ruffling generals' feathers before 9/11.


7 posted on 04/29/2006 4:19:08 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Tommy Franks was interviewed by O'Reilly once, and I wish I had his statements on weasly clark (Ashely Wilkes)! General Franks, in a most proper and set in decorum way, eviscerated weasly as an unstable egoist that failed to learn the art of taking orders.

weasly was summarily booted from the Military, due to his unstable order to start WWIII (by ordering the British General in charge of the Kosovo airport to attack Russian troops holding up there). He did it in the most diplomatic of ways, but left no doubts as to the treasonous nature of the General known as Ashley Wilkes!

LLS
8 posted on 04/29/2006 4:25:26 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Six Generals Shot Down By the Internet
9 posted on 04/29/2006 4:28:31 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

George Shultz was just about the most effective Secretary of State in U.S. history. Under President Reagan's leadership, he helped engineer the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union. Secretary Shultz deserves tremendous credit for the foreign policy successes of the Reagan years. When has something to say, it is worth listening.


10 posted on 04/29/2006 4:38:48 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Everybody above O-6 is a politician. The grumpy generals are tools. They're positioning themselves for good things from a Democrat administration. If they bet right they win big. If they bet wrong they are no bigger losers than they are now.


11 posted on 04/29/2006 4:45:50 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

12 posted on 04/29/2006 4:47:04 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

I don't think there are any generals young enough to be part of Generation X. Most likely these jerks are Baby-Boomers. Weasly Clark is a prime example!

Don't dog on my generation because of these fools. Oh, and we are known as the Reagan Generation (at least that's what most of us decided after his funeral).


13 posted on 04/29/2006 4:48:07 AM PDT by LubyGee (Insert something witty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LubyGee

Sorry. I was thinking of a line from The Conservative Mind something about a "voice forlorn, not because it is no longer heard but because it is no longer even recognizable" or something like that. George Shultz is definitely "old school".


14 posted on 04/29/2006 4:57:35 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

bttt


15 posted on 04/29/2006 4:58:55 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

That's okay. I just woke up and I have a tendency to be on the defensive first thing in the morning. Good thing my husband has finally learned that. :o)


16 posted on 04/29/2006 4:59:54 AM PDT by LubyGee (Insert something witty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Bump


17 posted on 04/29/2006 5:00:55 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

These generals yield lots of power while in command, and many of them with a large ego think they should go on to be commander in chief, their ideas of military concern are the only right ones.

General Macarthur was troubled with this inflated ego and, was slapped down by President Truman.

Mr Schultz is correct, we have got to get better control of our military leaders and, I would add to that, the CIA.

A break down of leadership will lead to our demise.


18 posted on 04/29/2006 5:24:53 AM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Excellent piece...I suggest all should give it a look.


19 posted on 04/29/2006 5:43:03 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Image hosted by Photobucket.com and there it is...

20 posted on 04/29/2006 5:49:43 AM PDT by Chode (1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT. American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson