Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine Corps Times on special ops efforts to nail Zarqawi
http://www.michellemalkin.com/ ^ | April 28, 2006 | Sean D. Naylor

Posted on 04/29/2006 3:12:19 PM PDT by northmoor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: ASA Vet
The O-5 commander of each task force can authorize a raid without seeking TF 145 approval.

This freedom, combined with the amount of intelligence generated on missions, creates a furious operational tempo for the TF 145 elements, which average well over a mission per day.

From 6 at night to 10 the next morning, “We’re going balls to the wall, doing hits all over the place,” the special operations source said.

This is why our SOF units have become so effective within Iraq over the past 12 months and Zarqawi will not be able to operate within our OODA loop for much longer - And while S. Naylor doesn't have the best of reputation (especially within the SEAL community) he was certainly given quite a decent behind the scenes type view here -

Zarqawi is alive because 1. He is a tough / mean SOB and 2. He has been da*m lucky! -

Also it is clear slightly within the article some of the bruised ego's within the "white" SOF community - But that is to be expected and is also over-hyped as well -

The reality is in this phase of the WOT we need more shooters / DA type guys -

Which is why the SEALs have been so prominent - the SEALs have become the premier direct action SOF units in the GWOT - (of course the smaller Delta element is right there as well)

I think the one major area of concern for JSOC was the concern that too many of our DA Units were so dependent on receiving their Intel from OGA's - That has switched to a sizable degree over the past 12 months (thanks to SecDef Rumsfeld) with more of this units developing and then immediately acting gathered Intel (Not to disparage OGAs...they have provided a ton of valuable Intel).

21 posted on 04/29/2006 7:12:12 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Disagree. The enemy is in the battle and have personal experience of the details. They already know. It is us that do not know what is going on. The detail of what composition of units do not help the enemy.


22 posted on 04/29/2006 7:13:34 PM PDT by Rhiannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Though it probably should be said that there have been some instances where "white" SOF units were not used to their capabilities (especially in Stan, I've heard from a few people)....because higher-up's were waiting on a "black" SOF unit to arrive - And because of this some HVTs likely have been missed -

That was in days past however and much of that has been corrected in Stan -

23 posted on 04/29/2006 7:14:57 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

Zarqawi is alive because 1. He is a tough / mean SOB and 2. He has been da*m lucky! 3. He's probably running things from Syria.


24 posted on 04/29/2006 7:17:27 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
3. He's probably running things from Syria.

Nah - the guys hunting his sorry as$ seem certain he is in Iraq (probably made runs to Syria back in 03 / 04 - But since mid 05 the routes to Syria have been cut off big time -

25 posted on 04/29/2006 7:20:00 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rhiannon
The detail of what composition of units do not help the enemy.

\I am speechless. Are you serious?

26 posted on 04/29/2006 7:22:59 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rhiannon; Eagles6
The detail of what composition of units do not help the enemy.

It does help the enemy. Order of battle info is traditionally classified, and assignments certainly are. We employ entire MI sections to do nothing but ferret out the enemy's order of battle. It is significant. In short, just about everything the enemy does not know helps our side....that's part of the information battle.

27 posted on 04/29/2006 7:32:33 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
Those of us in the MI community mostly consider OGA a non-intel agency.
Product goes to them, but they modify it to suit their political purpose.
OGA gives little thought to the tactical forces actually needing good product in a timely manner.
28 posted on 04/29/2006 7:33:47 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins
We employ entire MI sections to do nothing but ferret out the enemy's order of battle.

We use an enemy OB like a skeleton. Give us the skeleton up front and you'd be amazed at how quickly we can flesh it out.

29 posted on 04/29/2006 7:37:24 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Those of us in the MI community mostly consider OGA a non-intel agency.

Agreed - But we've put in practice several OGAs in recent times that are directly Intel oriented and working side by side with our SOF -

OGA gives little thought to the tactical forces actually needing good product in a timely manner.

Well said and very often too true -

30 posted on 04/29/2006 7:45:39 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
We went though the same missteps in SEA too.
Eventually your guys and our guys started working very closely, (including real time comms,) which benefited both your operators and our collection.
We took a very protective "mother hen" attitude towards "our guys."
You've have been amazed at the talent and resources brought to bear when you were in Indian country.
Also when you returned we enjoyed your company, (once you'd showered,)
and shared lots of quarrels about whose turn it was to buy.
Sadly that relationship faded after Nam.
31 posted on 04/29/2006 8:11:06 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
"He'd probably die of old age first if he's captured alive and put on trial."

More likely he'd be turned loose on a technical charge against the U.S. government by a Clinton-appointed judge.

32 posted on 04/29/2006 8:24:59 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American (Christianity and religion are two entirely different things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
Zarqawi's escape in Yusufiyah was not the first time special ops troops have nearly had him. In early 2005, they came so close they could see the Jordanian's panicked face as he fled.

If you don't mind, I have 2 questions.
First, if Z was fleeing, how did they see his face.

Second, if they were that close, why was he not shot and killed instead of being allowed to flee?

33 posted on 04/29/2006 8:32:43 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! I *LOVE* my attitude problem. Beware the Enemedia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog

ringey-pingey


34 posted on 04/29/2006 9:07:35 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Rush Limbaugh arrested. Mary McCarthy walking around free. Am I still on planet Earth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: northmoor

A miss is as good as a mile.

God favor them with better intel. God knows they have the guts to do the job.


35 posted on 04/30/2006 2:46:17 AM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

All true. It might confirm what he already knows... assuming everything in the article is correct. Then again, it might be what we want him to think is true. Information warfare at this level is not always straight forward.

At any rate, his spies are probably already ferreting such info out and more... one possible reason why he is still alive.


36 posted on 04/30/2006 3:09:26 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rhiannon

Eagle6 needs to watch Col David Hunt on Fox this morning he gave the same information that was in the article.


37 posted on 04/30/2006 7:35:08 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: northmoor

About Us
Overview
Armed Forces Journal and its Web site, AFJI.com, are published by Army Times Publishing Company, a part of Gannett Company, Inc., and the world's largest publisher of professional military and defense periodicals, with a strong heritage and tradition of meeting the highest standards of independent journalism. Since its inception in 1940, the company has expanded with distinct publications serving all branches of the U.S. military, the global defense community, the U.S. federal government, and several special-interest defense-oriented industry sectors.

Army Times Publishing Company is organized into three market sector groups to effectively cover the needs of the consumer and business-to-business communities served by its publications:

1. The Military Times Media Group, which publishes the Army Times, Navy Times, Air Force Times and Marine Corps Times newsweeklies;
2. the Defense News Media Group, which publishes Defense News, Armed Forces Journal, Training & Simulation Journal, and C4ISR Journal (Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance); and
3. the Federal Times newsweekly.

About The Defense News Media Group
Defense News Media Group is the world's leading group of professional defense trade periodicals. Publications in the Defense News Media Group include Armed Forces Journal, Defense News, Training & Simulation Journal and Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Journal. Each publication is the leader in its particular market segment.

Defense News is the global newsweekly for defense leadership, serving an audience of senior military and government decision-makers throughout the world. Defense News offers its readers insight and news analysis on defense programs, policy, business and technology, while setting the standard for accuracy, credibility and timeliness in defense journalism. DefenseNews.com is the online complement to the Defense News printed newsweekly, providing daily coverage of breaking news in the defense industry worldwide, free of charge to all Defense News subscribers.

Armed Forces Journal is the leading joint service monthly magazine for officers and leaders in the United States military community. Founded in 1863, AFJ has been providing essential review and analysis on key defense issues for over 140 years. AFJ offers in-depth feature coverage of military technology, procurement, logistics, strategy, doctrine and tactics. AFJ also provides special coverage of special operations, U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. National Guard developments.

Training & Simulation Journal, often referred to as TSJ, is a bimonthly journal that provides information on the latest trends in products and opportunities in the global military training and simulation market. The publication provides a forum for leaders in the field of training and simulation to obtain and exchange information on emerging issues, new technologies, and new products.

C4ISR Journal published 10 times per year, is a professional journal dedicated to the rapidly advancing, high-tech realm of military intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

Defense News Media Group Conferences bring together the best minds in defense - from the military, government and industry - in an annual series of conferences focusing on current issues like Joint Warfare and C4ISR. For more information on Defense News Media Group Conferences, click here.

For more information on advertising opportunities in the Defense News Media Group family of publications, click here.

To visit the Military Times Media Group Web sites, click on the following links:
ArmyTimes.com
NavyTimes.com
AirForceTimes.com
MarineCorpsTimes.com
MilitaryCity.com

To visit FederalTimes.com, click here


38 posted on 04/30/2006 7:50:48 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

Because a talking head ex-general says it on Fox that makes it alright? Unless it is a psyops campaign I can't see how it helps and can envision a hundred ways that it can hurt.


39 posted on 04/30/2006 8:12:26 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
"I believe this publication and Army Times, Navy Times and AF Times are published by USA Today and have no affiliation with the armed services."

There was a time when the "Times" was a publication we could all rely on. You learned about pay raises, promotions, etc., from the Times quicker then you did through channels. They also ran stories that were true to us, critical or non-critical, you believed them.

That changed a long time ago.

40 posted on 04/30/2006 8:14:52 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson