THE OTHER HILLARY CLINTON (ties to Anthony Pellicano)

prorev.com ^ | May 2005

[doug from upland]

Ping

[BenLurkin]

Bump!

[originalbuckeye]

When is something actually going to stick to her????

[debg]

I don't know but today I saw a bumper sticker that made me cheer:

"Hillary
Shut Up"

[SkyPilot]

"Bill Clinton physically attacked me."

"He pulled down his pants, took out his penis and told me to 'Kiss it baby.'"

"Then, he bit my lip until it bled, and forced me down, and then Clinton raped me."

"You guys hear anything? Did you hear something? I don't hear anything."

[nothingnew]

I am absolutely convinced that all your hard work and facts will be brought to the attention of the American Peeples if she who should not be named runs for POTUS by the APNN (the American Peeples News Networks).

We all thank you for all the work you've done to shine the light, Doug. I especially liked your coverage of Klamath Falls way back when.

My fear is, based on past experience and the "other party's", uhmm...reluctance, to call a liar, cheat, thief and marxist for what she is, nothing will really come out of this. If there were strong, honest and reliable people in our government, the clintons would be serving time already.

Joe Mc is dead and gone...If I get one shred of truth out of this government, and I mean "both parties, both houses", I feel lucky on that day.

FMCDH(BITS)

[nothingnew]

Any thoughts on post #8? You've got the most factual and minute details of all of this, along with MiaT (I can't read her stuff most of the time, I'm dial-up challenged).

I would value your opinion on whether or not she who will not be named will be seriously challenged with facts by whoever might run against her.

FMCDH(BITS)

[308MBR]

Okay. The Clintons are supported by a legion of bottom feeding ex government spooks.

Nothing new to see here. Move along.

[The Mayor]

BTTT!

[ntnychik]

Pellicano ping. Interesting how they can just erase something we all know happened.

[potlatch]

I thought you were asleep! Tricky, lol.

[potlatch]

Pellicano ping

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

Bump to the top.

[backhoe]

Any thoughts on post #8? You've got the most factual and minute details of all of this, along with MiaT (I can't read her stuff most of the time, I'm dial-up challenged). I would value your opinion on whether or not she who will not be named will be seriously challenged with facts by whoever might run against her.

My first, off the top of my head response is "Won't matter- the Drive-By Media either won't even talk about it to begin with, or will spin it in her favor-- just like they did for Bill in 1992 and 1996."

My second response? "But wait a minute- this 'New Media' thing seemed to impact the Jan. 23 election in Canada to an extent nobody forsaw-- so stay tuned."
Might be surprising.

On a "just my 2 cents" note, that woman I lovingly refer to as Hillarrhea!® has the worst negatives of anybody I've ever seen polled... she faces an uphill ( pun ) battle, but given that her darling Hubby, the man I dubbed 'Little Big Fraud™,' fooled America twice, you can't rule her out.

Further reading here:

-Hillary Clinton- archives, comments, and opposition research --

[nothingnew]

Thanks for the reply. Will hookup with your link toniote.

FMCDH(BITS)

[restornu]

Christian boy you sure are the defender of the faith!

[SkyPilot]

?????????

You pull out a 2 year old thread where I posted pictures of women Clinton abused and raped (and satirized the hypocrisy of the media in their ignoring them), and your comment is meant to disparage my Christianity?

Resty - your all nighter of Opposition Research was not very fruitful.