Taxpayer Supported ANSWER Hates America - And Organized May Day Boycotts

Sweetness & Light ^ | May 2, 2006 | N/A

[Sam Hill]

I realize that much of this is already familiar material to many here, especially those who have been in the front lines counter-protesting ANSWER's constant rallies.

But it doesn't hurt to remember who we are dealing with. Professional protestors, who are for the most part Communists.

[kstewskis]

*ping* to potential talking points"

Thanks for posting yet another facet of the truth of what is really going on, SH.

[Ptaz]

these people are freakin nuts

[Sam Hill]

Some "occupations" are good, some are bad:

[Sam Hill]

[Brad’s Gramma]

Bump this!

[Sam Hill]

Some of the grassroots signs made by the workers for their spontaneous demonstrations:

[Sam Hill]

A "Hate America, Inc" ping.

[Sam Hill]

[Mo1]

And as usual the commies and the illegal failed and made even more people ticked off at them

[Foolsgold]

which was in turn founded by former United States attorney general Ramsey Clark and the Workers World Party.

Isn't he the "Trial Lawyer" that is suing the world community for violating the civil rights of a duly elected leader , somewhere?

[Enterprise]

Just think. Sedition is tax exempt of taxpayer subsidized. What a country!

[shekkian]

I didn't know ANSWER was taxpayer supported. That's something we need to remedy right now. Make it a privately funded organization.

[hophead]

LEGAL immigrants ALREADY have FULL EQUAL RIGHTS!!!!!

Why are the sheeple of America conned by the "immigrant" label that is being forced on us. This argument is about "ILLEGAL ALIENS", NOT legal immigrants. But it is like talking to a wall.

[hophead]

He is one of Saddam's attorneys.

[Two-Bits]

I would love to see ANSWER's response to "Bring our troops home to protect our borders"........

[gumboyaya]

Why isn't Ramsey Clark in a Federal prison? Was he not a founder of this treasonous organization? Yet he hides behind the false assumption he is only defending the legal interest of the indefensible.

[OnRightOnLeftCoast]

Do those behind the ‘in your face’ demonstrations know about the power of protest and persistence?

Do they believe we are going to capitulate when faced with a determined opponent? (When is the last time our citizens stood up loudly demanding the end to ‘Sanctuary City’ status, or other state and national outrages?).

Do they believe they have a chance with a President that calls the Minutemen 'vigilantes?

Do they believe our government is hardly any more resolute than the French government was with their Muslim or employment riots, despite opinion polls showing 88% of Americans demand serious immigration control?

Two themes presented by the TV outlets on the May 1st walkout were ‘Guest Worker’ demands, and ‘Citizenship/Voting’. Count on it. If they get their foot in the door over the first demand, the second will follow.

We received this warning 20 years ago from Senator Alan Simpson:

“Americans are fed up with efforts to make them feel that [they] do not have that fundamental right of any people—to decide who will join them and help form the future country in which they and their posterity will live.

But if the elites and the advocates idea of giving voting rights to non-citizen majorities catches on—and don’t be surprised if it does - Americans could be faced with the ultimate absurdity of people outside the social compact making rules for those inside it."

A critic on TV a few weeks ago observed if citizens don’t WAKE UP NOW, reality will set in fully in about 20 years. The southwest will for practical purposes be an annex of Mexico. Then, the next step, with the power they will yield will be for SEPARIST demands. Remember QUEBEC?

As added emphasis to his point, Charles Krauthammer days later said the recent demonstrations are the movements 'COMING OUT PARTY' and the implications of their power simmering below the surface. We have two choices:

1> DEMAND ACTION from politicians at local, state and national levels.

2>

[Heartofsong83]

Exactly. That disproves their bogus claims "immigrants created America" - none of them were illegal gate-crashers.

Deport all illegals!!!

I've even been hearing of some illegals going all the way to Canada via the US...

[jmcenanly]

I think that the term 'Illegal Immigrant", for these people is inappropriate. An immigrant is one who goes to a new country and adapts himself to the culture of that country. People who travel to a country and expect the people there to adopt their culture are invaders.