Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angry Democrats paralyze FL state Senate with bill-reading tactic
Miami Herald ^ | 5/3/6 | Marc Caputo

Posted on 05/03/2006 10:01:15 AM PDT by Crackingham

State Senate Democrats, angry that chamber President Tom Lee pulled a parliamentary move to resurrect a school-voucher proposal that had died a day earlier, responded with a maneuver of their own this morning: Insisting that each bill be read in its mind-numbing entirety, bringing the chamber to a near standstill. Assuming it lasts all day, the bill-reading decision could mean high-profile legislation might die without a vote when the 60-day lawmaking session ends Friday. Among the bills: insurance fixes, hurricane response and preparation, and a plan to give inmates access to DNA tests to prove their innocence.

A monstrous time-killer looms: the 433-page budget, the only bill the Legislature is required to pass, could take hours to read. Sen. Walter ''Skip'' Campbell, a Tamarac Democrat, said the Democrats would call off the bill reading if they get a guarantee that the voucher bill will remain dead.

Democrats warned Lee Tuesday night that he was weakening trust in the once-clubby Senate when he decided to have the chamber reconsider a proposed constitutional amendment concerning vouchers, which allow public money to be spent on private schools. Democrats say the vouchers will ruin public education. Republicans insist it will improve it and give parents more choices. The amendment, a priority of Gov. Jeb Bush, failed by just one vote on Monday. It can now be voted on anew.

Normally, bills are read by their title only -- such as ''an act relating to trust funds'' -- but the state Constitution allows for the reading of the entire text if at least one-third of the chamber votes do to so. Democrats hold 14 seats in the 40-member Senate, just over one-third.

(Excerpt) Read more at miami.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: democrats; education; florida; obstructionistdems; publicschools; schools; schoolvouchers; vouchers

1 posted on 05/03/2006 10:01:18 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Maybe all bills should have to be read in entirety...that way there'd be fewer of them.


2 posted on 05/03/2006 10:03:24 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

They need that speed-talker guy.


3 posted on 05/03/2006 10:03:29 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Push the issue. Show what kind of obstructionists the Dems are becoming. Bray loudly in the press on how the Dems are holding up important legislation.
4 posted on 05/03/2006 10:05:33 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
The Democratic Party: Doing What We Do Best!

                    Lie, defame, obfuscate, rant and obstruct
5 posted on 05/03/2006 10:10:58 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Maybe all bills should have to be read in entirety...that way there'd be fewer of them.

What an excellent idea! And a new law could be passed requiring that no bill can be submitted if it takes more than 10 minutes to read aloud.

6 posted on 05/03/2006 10:11:23 AM PDT by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I'd be satisfied with requiring each representative to execute a written statement under oath that he/she has read a bill in its entirety before voting on it.


7 posted on 05/03/2006 10:11:46 AM PDT by Maceman (Fake but accurate, and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
requiring each representative to execute a written statement under oath

Why, that would be like releasing illegal immigrants on their own recognizance.

8 posted on 05/03/2006 10:13:09 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

"Insisting that each bill be read in its mind-numbing entirety"

You mean they might actually know what they are voting on? That is horrible! How dare they!


9 posted on 05/03/2006 10:13:17 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I'm looking for the down side, here. If they read all of the bills in chambers, maybe they will have a glimmer of what it is they are voting on.

Could vastly improve the caliber of legislation that oozes out of the legislature.


10 posted on 05/03/2006 10:13:29 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

All bills should have to be read and reread. I can't believe they can legally sign them without reading them first.


11 posted on 05/03/2006 10:16:34 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Ah, the Party of obstruction hard at work again showing the world that they have no solutions to offer for fixing today's problems.


12 posted on 05/03/2006 10:16:44 AM PDT by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus; American Quilter; Maceman

Perhaps everyone voting in favor should personally type the text into a computer terminal. If the majority agree -- down to the last comma -- then the bill passes.


13 posted on 05/03/2006 10:17:01 AM PDT by xenophiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Democrats know all the dirty tricks and they arent afraid to use them, I wish the republicans had the balls to use some of them.


14 posted on 05/03/2006 10:20:15 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Insisting that each bill be read in its mind-numbing entirety, bringing the chamber to a near standstill.

Considering that there is so much detail that is hidden in the bills, I think this is a great idea.

15 posted on 05/03/2006 10:22:56 AM PDT by technochick99 ( Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Maybe all bills should have to be read in entirety...that way there'd be fewer of them.


I will vote for that, after reading it.


16 posted on 05/03/2006 10:31:16 AM PDT by fproy2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Maybe all bills should have to be read in entirety...that way there'd be fewer of them.

I Second that emotion. (:^D)

17 posted on 05/03/2006 10:36:17 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Angry Democrats..

Is there any other kind???

18 posted on 05/03/2006 11:19:10 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Actually having to READ a bill before you vote on it ?

... and it was the DEMOCRATS who came up with this ?

Damn .. I guess blind squirrels DO find a nut once in a while ...
19 posted on 05/03/2006 11:37:19 AM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

The rat can do little else in the Sunshine State, but watch as the grown ups do the business of government.


20 posted on 05/03/2006 12:03:17 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Everyday brings a new reason to distrust Hillary Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Each GOP member should read a separate part at the same time.


21 posted on 05/03/2006 12:16:45 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

"Democrats say the vouchers will ruin public education."

That's the whole point!!

Besides. How can you 'ruin' something that was a disaster from the beginning?



22 posted on 05/03/2006 12:18:12 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

These Dem lapdogs of the NEA would rather see the entire state go down rather than endanger that union's campaign contributions for this fall's elections. That tells you everything you need to know about Democrats.


23 posted on 05/03/2006 12:20:38 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37; All

Left out of the article,

Skip Campbell (D) is a lawyer from Broward County which was ground Zero for the 2000 election. He is not just a "D" but a heavy "D" party man. He is also heavy into JUDICIAL politics with his law firm.

It is also important to point out the "D" party is VERY dependant on the teacher's union in FL. Down in Broward County there is one of the largest school districts in the country. For Democrats this voucher debate is more do or die than it is for the teachers.

follow the money.


24 posted on 05/03/2006 12:27:18 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

These guys learned these tactics from the Democrats in the Senate lead by Harry Reid!


25 posted on 05/03/2006 1:05:23 PM PDT by petkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Fewer and shorter, less prone to be loaded up with amendments to pay for paving a representative's driveway.


26 posted on 05/03/2006 2:20:29 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
Could vastly improve the caliber of legislation

and could vastly reduce the number of bills submitted. The wealth of benefits to this is breathtaking.

27 posted on 05/03/2006 2:22:29 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

The Republican majority should grab this bull by the horns and pass a law requiring that all bills be read in their entirety.


28 posted on 05/03/2006 2:23:42 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Gee Crack, you post a lot of articles but you never seem to offer a comment on them.


29 posted on 05/04/2006 1:15:26 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson