Posted on 05/03/2006 4:12:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
NEW YORK - An important wind circulation pattern over the Pacific Ocean has begun to weaken because of global warming caused by human activity, something that could alter climate and the marine food chain in the region, new research suggests.
It's not clear what climate changes might arise in the area or possibly beyond, but the long-term effect might resemble some aspects of an El Nino event, a study author said.
El Ninos boost rainfall in the southern United States and western South America and bring dry weather or even drought to Indonesia, Malaysia and elsewhere in the western Pacific.
As for the Pacific food chain near the equator, the slowdown might reduce populations of tiny plants and animals up through the fish that eat them, because of reduced nutrition welling up from the deep, said the author, Gabriel Vecchi.
Vecchi, a visiting scientist at a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration lab in Princeton, N.J., and colleagues present their results in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.
The slowdown was detected in shipboard and land-based data going back to the mid-1800s. It matches an effect predicted by computer climate simulations that trace global warming to a build-up of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, the researchers report. But simulations that consider only natural influences fail to produce the observed slowdown, Vecchi said.
So, it appears the slowdown is largely due to the man-made buildup of greenhouse gases, the researchers concluded. And the result lends more credibility to computer models that trace global warming to greenhouse gases, at least for their ability to forecast what will happen in the tropics, Vecchi said.
The study focused on what scientists call the Walker circulation, a huge wind pattern that covers almost half the circumference of Earth.
The pattern traces a huge loop. Trade winds blow across the Pacific from east to west. The air rises in the western Pacific and then returns eastward at an altitude of a few miles. Then it sinks back to the surface and starts the loop again.
The new study is based on barometric pressure readings, since differences in air pressure drive winds near the equator. Results suggest the average wind speed in the Walker circulation has weakened by about 3.5 percent since the mid-1800s. It has weakened faster since World War II than in the long-term trend since the mid-1800s, Vecchi said.
Computer simulations say the circulation might weaken another 10 percent by 2100, Vecchi said.
Dennis Hartmann, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington, said the study makes a strong case that the Walker circulation has slowed. While such an effect had been predicted as a result of global warming, he said, "it's not been demonstrated before as clearly as they've done here."
___
On the Net:
http://www.nature.com/nature

Climate scientists identified a likely new victim of global warming on May 3, 2006, the vast looping system of air currents that fuels Pacific trade winds and climate from South America to Indonesia. This could mean more El Nino-like weather patterns in the United States, more rain in the western Pacific and less nourishment for marine life along the Equator and off the South American coast. This illustration shows Walker Circulation, this system of currents functions as a huge belt stretching across the tropical Pacific, with dry air moving eastward at high altitude from Asia to South America and moist air flowing westward along the ocean's surface, pushing the prevailing trade winds. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY REUTERS/Illustrations by Gabriel Vecchi/UCAR/Handout
Bunch of hot air.
The Tripod went out the same time as usual. If there were global warming it would be going out a week or two earlier, but it's not, so there isn't. QED
Here ya go!!!

El Ninos boost rainfall in the southern United States and western South America and bring dry weather or even drought to Indonesia, Malaysia and elsewhere in the western Pacific.
Sounds like it might make our deserts a little more suitable for farmland.

South Korean environmental activists wear costumes resembling a polar bear and U.S. President George W. Bush (R) as they perform during an Earth Day event in Seoul, April 23, 2006. The activists were protesting against U.S. policy towards global warming. REUTERS/You Sung-Ho
ManBearPig!!! I'm Cereal!!!

Inhabitants in the Canadian Arctic settlement of Resolute Bay, Nunavut arrive for church on a snowmobile April 9, 2006. Even in one of the remotest, coldest and most inhospitable parts of Canada's High Arctic, you cannot escape the signs of global warming. REUTERS/David Ljunggren/Files
Global warming has nothing to do with activity by man. Man made effects are zero. Climate change has been taking place for millions of years. It is caused primarily by the Sun's changing energy output, not to mention sunspot activity, our Molten Core, the Earth's Magnetic Field, the Moon, and the timing of the Solar activity, including our orbital relationship to the Sun.
The material presented is just more junk science equivalent to what we learned about when we read "Chicken Little."
Must be a planeload of Democrats on their way to endorse the Kyoto Treaty.
and it's possible they might be full of it, but it's not clear or certain. However, their rambling suggests they haven't a clue. the only thing certain is that they are politically motivated to gain power and rule the world, while lining their pockets. (I hear Billy boy Clintooone has been eying castles in Europe. A king does have need of one, you know...)
you wrote: Sounds like it might make our deserts a little more suitable for farmland.
I like that idea!
Heck, it was a lot warmer here in the north eastern US, Canada, (probably all of Northern US and Canada - we just don't have any records of it ) Greenland and northern Europe 600 (from at least 998 to 1350 AD) years ago - and some shorelines were a mile inland from where they are now. What on earth were those Vikings and tribes in Europe doing!
I say, if nature wants to warm up again - bring it on.
In fact, there are several credible scientific studies theorizing that the same conditions that brought on the last Little Ice Age are setting up again. Maybe the warm up and the cool down will balance one another. Maybe nature knows what she's doing.
Gore was in Seattle yesterday.
There ya go!
Bet you could get a gazillion dollar grant to implement that
You build a computer model to study global warming caused by man.
You plug in numbers and, amazingly, you discover global warming caused by man.
You plug in other numbers and, amazingly, you discover global warming caused by man.
You plug in random numbers and, shockingly, you discover global warming caused by man.
You plug in negative numbers and, suspiciously, you discover global warming caused by man.
You plug in still other numbers and you suddenly don't get global warming caused by man. You regroup and "fix" the numbers, plug them back in and, surprise, surprise, you get global warming caused by man.
You are now happy (because you just got another government grant to study global warming caused by man).
The phrase "grant whore" comes to mind. Fraud is another good one.
"Sounds like it might make our deserts a little more suitable for farmland."
Then we can grow our own car gas and live more self-sufficient ecologically balanced lives?
Ah, that would explain it.
It is a serious error to begin a "factual" article by making aan assertion based on a "suggestion". Oxymoron is the kindest comment here, and I certainly won't waste time reading the remainder of the report.
There is something fascinating about [agenda] science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.
Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi, Chapter XVII (Pg 209)
Seriously, what don't these people understand about climate shifts? Do they honestly expect, now that the earth is civilized (as opposed to populted by dinasours) that suddenly the earth would never change and would always be predictable? No more ice ages, or shifts in the poles, etc.???
Does this mean there will no longer be a "chill wind" blowing through Hollywood?
Show us the data.
I am so tired of these alarmist "studies" that never present any actual data that we can see. I think the general public is becoming tired as well.
"It matches an effect predicted by computer climate simulations that trace global warming to a build-up of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, the researchers report."
If these people were held to their predictions of the last 40 years they would be laughed out of the room. Obviously simulations have become more sophisticated but in the end they are...simulations.
The fact that enviromentalist refuse to conduct blind studies with different sequestered teams to alleviate bias always makes me distrust such results. There can be grains of truth but it is always spoiled by potential/obvious bias.
"BRING IT ON"!!!!
If they understand what was going on well enough to be able to create computer simulations of it, they why is it "not clear what climate changes might arise in the area or possibly beyond,"?
Wasn't the Alaskan interior really cold this winter?
Is there a historic chart or table about when the tripod goes out (ice breaks up)?
I dono, I kind of like El Ninos. All the extra rain hepls keep my SUV clean.
I like your attitude. Being a Minnesotan, I agree wholeheartedly!
Many factors. It's not simple by any means. Even the time of day is tricky. I have come within a day a couple of times, and once got the right hour and minute but the next day. Winners tend to cover a lot of times in pools rather than calculate everything and put up a single entry. The phase of the moon is often overlooked, which throws everything off. The time was a couple of hours late this time, which is because the days are warming slowly during the day, and that is difficult to calculate since all entries have to be in a month ahead.
Ah, but we hoi polloi, the great unwashed wouldn't understand the esoteric data. Yea, we would be confounded and wouldn't understand the concept of modelling, of history matching, and most importantly, "calibration" or "fudging" of the data.
We, the unwashed, wouldn't understand that the data must (after proper "data enrichment" or "fudging") produce a "hockey stick" projection of temperatures into the infinite future. That is, temperatures were very well behaved back to the beginning of the planet, but lo and behole! They began a stratopheric rise about 1975 due to man's obscene and evil effect on the atmostphere. Also, it seemed to be due to the fact that our Mensa scientists discovered in the 60's and 70's that our sister planet Venue was hot as hell. So how could earth be doing anything like cooling??
The hockey stick projection, my fellow unwashed and ignorant souls, is the sine qua non of proving man's influence on the earth's temperature. (I always revert to Latin when I want to confound the audience. The 23 Karat bamboozle, as Pogo put it). Up to 1975, it appeared that global cooling was once more setting in.
But with the coming of computers, it was possible to run a bunch of calculations (called GIGO) to model the future out to infinity so that earth's temperature would do like the newly discovered temperatures around romantic Venus - they would head for hot as hell areas. Melting lead, and all that.
I would continue in my plebian and very unwashed way to continue to explain these phenomena to those who don't understand. But I'm tired, and prefer to enjoy the cool evenings watching the stars and planets with my Meade telescope bestowed on me at Christmas. Which simply means I don't understand it.
And besides, a word to the wise from an old hoi polloi modelling hand:
These hockey pucks don't understand it either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.