I wasn't in a conversation about machine guns, you were. But, for some reason, you asked me a direct question about it, and I gave you a direct answer. Banning them was a "moral judgment". It was a wrong moral judgment, IMO, but that's what it was nonetheless.
Is that clear enough for you?
It's clear that some of you fellas like to play word games about what construes a 'moral' judgment.
Legislators who ignore our Constitution while banning machine guns is an immoral act.
--- Is that clear enough for you?