Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jessica Lynch Ends First Year of College
Yahooooooo! ^ | May 6, 2006 | Allison Barker

Posted on 05/06/2006 1:48:16 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

Three years after her capture and dramatic nighttime rescue in the early days of the Iraq war made her an instant celebrity, Jessica Lynch yearns for the ordinary.

She's just finished her first year at West Virginia University, where she's become an anonymous college student on a campus of thousands.

"I think people recognize who I am; they just don't make it obvious," Lynch, 23, said in a recent interview with The Associated Press.

"That's good for me because it gives me the opportunity to blend in and not stick out and really experience the college life just like they are."

Lynch, who joined the Army at 18 to see the world and earn money for college, attends WVU on a state scholarship. She grew up wanting to be a kindergarten teacher, but abandoned that idea after taking one education class.

"I haven't really found my direction of where I'm headed right now with everything I've been through," she said.

She changed her major to journalism because of her experience with the media and spends Wednesdays working at the campus radio station. Still, she's not sure if journalism is in her future.

"I enjoy broadcasting and I know I want to do something with children," she said. "I'd really like to start a kids TV program here in West Virginia. Something for kids who are in the hospital or have cancer."

Lynch's 507th Army Maintenance Company convoy was in Nasiriyah on March 23, 2003, when it took a wrong turn and was attacked. Eleven American soldiers were killed and six were captured, including Lynch.

The former supply clerk suffered extensive injuries when her Humvee crashed during the firefight. Her videotaped rescue from Saddam Hospital by U.S. special forces nine days later transformed the soft-spoken woman into a hero.

She still has no feeling in her left leg and has to wear a brace to support her foot because of nerve damage. And Lynch says she still can't remember the events that filled the two hours after her convoy was hit.

"Right now, I have sort of this image of what could have happened," she said. "If I actually knew and it came back, I probably would have nightmares for the rest of my life."

Though she was once engaged to former Army Sgt. Ruben Contreras, she now has a new boyfriend in Parkersburg. She protects details about her private life, saying only she met him through family.

Lynch spends most of the week on campus, but often leaves town on weekends to visit her boyfriend or her parents.

"I want people to remember me as being a soldier who went over there and did my job fighting for our country, our freedom. Nothing special. ... I'm just a country girl at heart."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; US: West Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 507th; iraq; jessicalynch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last
Glad to see her getting on with her life.
1 posted on 05/06/2006 1:48:19 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
She grew up wanting to be a kindergarten teacher, but abandoned that idea after taking one education class.

No surprise there!

Good for her ... she has plenty of time to decide what she wants to do after college.

2 posted on 05/06/2006 1:49:49 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Dump the 1967 Outer Space Treaty! I'll weigh 50% less on Mars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

LOL! My first thought, too! :)


3 posted on 05/06/2006 1:51:49 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I'll bet Yale and Harvard wouldn't be as as West Virginia U. open about her attending as they were for the former Tali ban spokesman. (After all, can't have any "warmongering" white americans on campus, can we? It would upset the cowards, cretins, creeps and traitors that make up the majority of our faculty)
4 posted on 05/06/2006 1:54:47 PM PDT by MCCRon58 (Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, complain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

5 posted on 05/06/2006 1:56:50 PM PDT by Popman ("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

"This was probably the first incident in U.S. military history in which an American soldier was awarded our country's fourth-highest ground-fighting award for being conked out and off the air throughout a fight." Col. David Hackworth




She openly admits she never fired her weapon, and that she simply cried, and screamed into her commanding NCOs ear while everyone else on the Humvee was fighting or driving.

This girl should have been brought up on charges of cowardice in the face of the enemy, while wearing the uniform of an American soldier.


6 posted on 05/06/2006 2:02:25 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Most people are not trained to deal with the stresses of combat. In fact, I would postulate that as much as 1/3rd of the trained INFANTRY do not perform their duties properly the first time they are in combat.

Many studies have been conducted on the actions of trained individuals and their responses to combat conditions. In the Civil war, soldiers would load their weapons, point it at the enemy, believe they fired, and then start reloading.... but never having taken a shot. Often ending up with a very dangerous situation of having 5 or 6 loads crammed down their barrels. In Vietnam, soldiers would often not even attempt to fire at the enemy, simply firing into the air.

The point is, if TRAINED soldiers react this way the first time they are in combat, can we honestly expect support personnel to behave like seasoned front line troops?

Granted, she did not deserve a medal and kudos for her for being honest about her actions.... but a trial, no that is not an appropriate response.
7 posted on 05/06/2006 2:19:32 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; All

We could've predicted someone with your thoughts was going to show up. And your experience on the battlefield while under fire is...?

And before you get all "jiggy with me" I just want you to know that I'm a Desert Storm Vet, so you can probably figure out exactly where I'm coming from. :)


8 posted on 05/06/2006 2:23:11 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
I forgot who it was who said it...
"Something about military combat. If you're good, you can only get better."
9 posted on 05/06/2006 2:25:36 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

actually, girls do not belong in combat.


10 posted on 05/06/2006 2:26:19 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

She wants to major journalism, after being a poster child for bad journalism? Not that its her FAULT -- God knows it isn't! -- but what news organization, solid lefty scum that they are, would hire her?

What am I saying? She's an attractive blonde... there's always Foxy news.


11 posted on 05/06/2006 2:26:57 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Even in WWII it is estimated that as much as 50% of our troops did not fire their weapons during combat.


12 posted on 05/06/2006 2:27:05 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Most people are not trained to deal with the stresses of combat. In fact, I would postulate that as much as 1/3rd of the trained INFANTRY do not perform their duties properly the first time they are in combat. Many studies have been conducted on the actions of trained individuals and their responses to combat conditions. In the Civil war, soldiers would load their weapons, point it at the enemy, believe they fired, and then start reloading.... but never having taken a shot. Often ending up with a very dangerous situation of having 5 or 6 loads crammed down their barrels. In Vietnam, soldiers would often not even attempt to fire at the enemy, simply firing into the air. The point is, if TRAINED soldiers react this way the first time they are in combat, can we honestly expect support personnel to behave like seasoned front line troops?

I'm afraid the results of this "study" have been conclusively discredited. Soldiers do fire their weapons - even the ones with minimal training. (There are some who go into a fetal position, but those are a tiny minority). If anything, they're too liberal about firing their weapons unaimed, which is why they keep on running out of ammo. However, even with the trained soldiers that we have, it is possible to fire thousands of rounds without hitting a single person. This is what happened in a recent blue-on-blue incident documented by Michael Fumento. Americans fired 300 rounds at Iraqi troops, who replied with 1700 rounds. Fortunately they all missed. The fact that she couldn't handle the stresses of combat well enough to even fire her weapon indicates that she isn't cut out for the army - most soldiers will fire back even if they don't hit anything.
13 posted on 05/06/2006 2:29:56 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ikka

Yeah, that's in line with what I've read.

Especially in a first combat, the VAST majority of troops, even ones that have received decent training, essentially "freeze."

Something you don't see in the movies.


14 posted on 05/06/2006 2:30:28 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Well said, Brave One.


15 posted on 05/06/2006 2:31:57 PM PDT by tupac (Just wondered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

When I read the Army report and watched a long interview with her, it seems she may have been responsible for the deaths of the Humvee occupants.

While the two males they picked up instantly grabbed the SAW and got it going, she says she continued screaming and distracting her NCO passenger until the female driver crashed the vehicle and they were all killed, except for Jessica.


16 posted on 05/06/2006 2:32:08 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Even in WWII it is estimated that as much as 50% of our troops did not fire their weapons during combat.

This SLA Marshall study has been discredited. Most soldiers fire their weapons - they just don't aim. We saw a lot of this in Vietnam - ARVN troops would raise their weapons over a wall of sandbags, or swing their rifles around the corner of a building and just pull the trigger until the magazine was emptied.
17 posted on 05/06/2006 2:34:19 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Combat troops that were fighting in the front line?

BS...

A huge portion of the troops are in support position supporting the war fighters.

18 posted on 05/06/2006 2:34:30 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Sounds like a wonderful person.

Pretty, too.


19 posted on 05/06/2006 2:34:44 PM PDT by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tupac

"Well said, Brave One."


Thanks, something tells me the normal rules of military discussion don't apply when it involves a female.


20 posted on 05/06/2006 2:35:39 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Do you think it was her fault she was put in that postition or could the Army have recognized that she was not combat soldier material? Blaming her is pointless.


21 posted on 05/06/2006 2:37:10 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies get to vote!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Having served 3 tours in Vietnam, two as an infantryman, the complaint from the chain of command was normally that we were burning up too much ammo. I never had a problem firing my weapon. The only times I did see guys raising their weapons without aiming was when we were pinned down and raising your head could result in a very bad day. They just wanted to send some fire back to keep the enemy off of them until the enemy could be flanked or taken out with indirect fire.


22 posted on 05/06/2006 2:38:30 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I am glad she is doing well and wish her all the best.


23 posted on 05/06/2006 2:39:24 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

A lot leftist anti-war bunk out there that gets spouted as facts.


24 posted on 05/06/2006 2:40:36 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Don't even mention this girls name to active duty military, they go off. I'm not kidding. Every person whom I've come in contact in the military which is alot since my husband is active duty) can't stand the mention of her name!


25 posted on 05/06/2006 2:41:25 PM PDT by Thumbellina (As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Everyone has their breaking point. If you don't think so, I suggest you do some research.

See" The Red Badge of Courage" a movie with Audi Murphy as the star. Or "To Hell and Back: The Audie Murphy Story". Audi Murphy had great eyes, and could often pick out the enemy in a distant concealed position, which gave him great advantages. He was literally without fear, but he did have the usual recurring nightmares, and other aspects of "Post Tramatic Stress Disorder".

It is well known that the first time in battle, reactions differ. After the first battle, units, and the soldiers in them, get more reliable. They develop an ability to assess the risk associated with various courses of action. That ability to assess risk, and to trust their assessment, often permits experienced soldiers to act when rookies would freeze, still looking for more information. Alas, sometimes the assessment is wrong, because every battle situation is different.

After some time in continuous action, soldiers get tired, and their performance drops. They take short cuts. Some soldiers have the greatest stress when they come out from enemy contact, and then, after a rest, are recommitted.

The bravest man can be stopped by a bullet. The opportunity to fight back gives you something to do, and the directed action takes your mind off the negitive aspects of the battle. The Driver, Gunner, and NCO/Commander all had tasks on which to focus their attention. She was cargo, and had nothing (aside from a good book, perhaps) to contribute. Pretty soon the jeep got into a severe accident, and there wasn't anything else you could do.

Medals are not given as a reward for service, but rather, to encourage appropriate behavior in serving soldiers. Napoleon said "If I had enough ribbon, I could conquer the world." There is nothing we can do to reward a soldier who is killed in action. He is above our praise, and free from all worries and cares. Still, medals given to those wounded, killed, or successful, can be awarded as an indication that the Service finds their example useful.

When Jessica said to the Rangers, "I am an American Soldier too" that was a wonderful example, to my way of thinking. Your mileage may differ.


26 posted on 05/06/2006 2:42:57 PM PDT by Donald Meaker (The MG-42 has a rate of fire of 1300 rounds per minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

"Do you think it was her fault she was put in that postition or could the Army have recognized that she was not combat soldier material? Blaming her is pointless."


Yes it was U.S.Army PFC. Lynch's fault,

furthermore like I say, so, when I meet a female Marine I'm supposed to accept her as a 100% Marine, if so, then that standard is adequate for the men as well, so we can eliminate dual standards.



27 posted on 05/06/2006 2:45:35 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

For her the war is over, a lot of people in the service
either didn't get what they deserved or got what they didn't deserve. IT DOESN'T MATTER, what matters is that
she is gettin on with life, those moments she went though
will be with her always, let her deal with it.

You go Jess!


28 posted on 05/06/2006 2:47:51 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker
I wasn't criticizing. I was just putting a quote that I thought would be appropriate for the thread.
29 posted on 05/06/2006 2:48:55 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
furthermore like I say, so, when I meet a female Marine I'm supposed to accept her as a 100% Marine, if so, then that standard is adequate for the men as well, so we can eliminate dual standards.

I am not sure what you are saying here. Can you clarify this statement?

As for Lynch, she should not have been in combat. She clearly didn't belong and she didn't order herself into a combat zone - the Army did.

30 posted on 05/06/2006 2:49:17 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies get to vote!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina

"Don't even mention this girls name to active duty military, they go off. I'm not kidding. Every person whom I've come in contact in the military which is alot since my husband is active duty) can't stand the mention of her name!'


I know, there are a lot of threads here about Bronze star awardees and I have to bite my tongue from making a sarcastic remark about Lynch's Bronze star.

We all know Jessica is an OK American girl.

What her defenders forget is that we only know her as being a soldier, and that is what we and everyone else should criticize or least not honor her for, she was a great disgrace.

If it wasn't for that bronze star she pinned on her chest, and her willingness to accept celebrity and honors, it would be easier to let sleeping dogs lie.

We are still fighting that war, and there is nothing wrong with siding with the soldiers, concerning their embarrassment over PFC Lynch.


31 posted on 05/06/2006 2:59:06 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I have not been in combat -- although I drove a cab for 6 years and have thus been put in the hospital and put people there too. That permits me to say that you never know how you're going to react when you are in a life-or-death situation until it happens. And it's different each time.

Furthermore, we will never know what actually happened that day, so I am more than reluctant to praise or condemn someone who was in a support company, found herself under fire, lost most of her buddies, was raped while injured, etc.

I wish her the best.


32 posted on 05/06/2006 3:01:50 PM PDT by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Hackworth was criticising. He was wrong.

Hack was a very good commander, but after his third tour in Vietnam, had trouble with stress, and took to alcohol. After his retirement, he eventually became kind of like the "Hijab police", but rather than guarding against people who don't cover their hair quite enough, he started a crusade against people who were not brave enough for his medals.

Hack was a leader of a Division "provisional Ranger" platoon in Korea. Based on that, he pasted ranger tabs on his web site. Army rules were "Ranger Tabs are for people who complete Ranger School".

After that, he went after the first Navy Chief of Naval Operations who had previously served as enlisted. Hack found an ambiguity in the Navy Regulations on whether a small "V" should be worn on his ribbons and medals. The CNO had, in recognition of the ambiguity, stopped wearing the V, but some prior official photographs showed him wearing it. The CNO was so embarassed, that he committed suicide.

Full Disclosure: I attended US Army Ranger school in 1977, and did not complete the course, due to catching pneumonia.

What is more important, the act, or the medal which commerates the act? What is more holy, the Altar, or the Gift on the Altar?


33 posted on 05/06/2006 3:03:11 PM PDT by Donald Meaker (The MG-42 has a rate of fire of 1300 rounds per minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina

Could you elaborate. I always felt she was a nice person, not particularly bright, who was in a support position and got into a combat situation and didn't handle it to well.

She seemed to handle her captivity fine. No anti-American nonsense from her.

I thought the parade was hokey, but other than that, she had a long rehabilitation. What bothers active duty military about her.


34 posted on 05/06/2006 3:06:46 PM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

"I am not sure what you are saying here. Can you clarify this statement? "


When we meet a female soldier or marine, we are all supposed to see them as 100% soldiers or marines, just like the men are.

The reality is that when women were brought in, the military knew they couldn't pass the standards, so it was necessary to find out what they could do, then make that the standard for women.


Once women pass that standard, they are good to go, fully qualified in their chosen soldier or marine duties, what I'm saying is, if they are fully qualified, then whatever standard they passed should be all that is needed for men or women.

To have a different standard for the men is to put the lie to the claim the women are capable of doing the job.

A follow up question is if you were forced to choose between three options,

Should the Marine Corps be 100% male 50% female, or 100% female what would you choose?


35 posted on 05/06/2006 3:14:17 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

There are reports and accounts, exactly what happened and why, will always be a matter of contention. You may be correct and still be wrong. When action is called for, sometimes it is better not to act precipitously.

In combat such as this, I suspect, that most people are just not mentally prepared to act physically.


36 posted on 05/06/2006 3:16:21 PM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly; ansel12

For the most part, you are correct about what you said. What tends to annoy the active duty folks, however, is how over-inflated her self-importance afterwards. What really upset my husband was how she refused to meet the Iraqi doctor who saved her life. He risked his life and family for hers and she didn't care. I think she went back later and met him, but that was more to public pressure than something she wanted to do.

There were many who fought and many who died during the war. However, the media opted to place focus on one person who was in the wrong place at the wrong time, but was, fortunately for her, rescued in the end. Yet, after the rescue, she essentially turned her back on all who sacrificed to help her. That's what annoys the active duty.


37 posted on 05/06/2006 3:17:28 PM PDT by Thumbellina (As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina

Thanks for the info. That makes sense. She seemed ungrateful. I think she wasn't too bright, but the Iraqis who held her seemed to like her.

She didn't get the guidance she needed after she was released.

Did she show gratitude to the special ops who rescued her. Thanks again for the info.


38 posted on 05/06/2006 3:22:05 PM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly
1. Remember the video tape of her rescue? She slammed the Pentagon for trying to more or less glorify her rescue. Which REALLY pissed off the folks that went in there to rescue her. Remember MANY different branches of our military where involved and many soldiers in this rescue to save her life.

2. The man that saved her life made to trips by foot to the nearest base to reveal her where abouts and great cost not only to himself but to his wife and children. This man was a lawyer married to a doctor whom treated her injuries. That's how he found out where she was. Our government brought him and his family to the US to protect them from being killed. When he got here he asked to meet with her and she initially turned him down. She changed her mind ONLY when the press started talking about it.

As far as thanking the special ops...I'm not sure but I'm sure she did.
39 posted on 05/06/2006 3:31:12 PM PDT by Thumbellina (As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina

Well, she's just an ignorant girl then. Maybe college will help her.

What bothers me is that we have some real heroes in this war, some people who should be highlighted. The media always picks the most undeserving.

Oh, well.


40 posted on 05/06/2006 3:36:46 PM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina

Well, she's just an ignorant girl then. Maybe college will help her.

What bothers me is that we have some real heroes in this war, some people who should be highlighted. The media always picks the most undeserving.

Oh, well.


41 posted on 05/06/2006 3:37:55 PM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Those who talk the most...do the least...


42 posted on 05/06/2006 3:40:09 PM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Even in WWII it is estimated that as much as 50% of our troops did not fire their weapons during combat.

It was actually higher than that. For regular army, it was around 67%. It was much lower for Ranger and Airborne forces but still over 30%. Marines, IIRC, were around 40% early in the war and it rose to over 50% as more and more poorly trained replacements (the "three week wonders") entered the ranks.

43 posted on 05/06/2006 3:41:37 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

As a veteran, the only embarrassment I feel is for you. Taking cheap shots at Jessica Lynch is easy. What a big man you are.


44 posted on 05/06/2006 3:43:33 PM PDT by CheezyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina
>>Don't even mention this girls name to active duty military, they go off. I'm not kidding. Every person whom I've come in contact in the military which is alot since my husband is active duty) can't stand the mention of her name!<<

I wonder if their problem is with her directly or with the way the press and brass handled her story.
45 posted on 05/06/2006 3:44:29 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Thumbellina
I am a AF reserve medic and I have deployed to Germany to help in the movement of the Wounded Warriors, coming into Germany. I know the medics that actually worked on moving Lori while she was there. They can't stand her either. I don't know the whole story, but I know that she isn't held in high regard. I wonder of Lori Piestwa (sp?) fired her weapon.
46 posted on 05/06/2006 3:46:43 PM PDT by marmar (Pray for our Warriors...they are the greatest there are............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Read posting 37 and 39.


47 posted on 05/06/2006 3:47:45 PM PDT by Thumbellina (As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

That girl should have never been sent there. WOMEN SHOULD NOT BE IN COMBAT.


48 posted on 05/06/2006 3:49:17 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina

Thank you.


49 posted on 05/06/2006 3:50:27 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine

Yeah, no woman in the military either...


50 posted on 05/06/2006 3:51:40 PM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson