Skip to comments.
Bush on Foxnews Right Now
FoxNews
Posted on 05/08/2006 8:59:24 AM PDT by rodeocowboy
Bush is on Fox News Channel right now giving a report on Sudan. He declaired that genocide is happening at this time. Taking no questions. Will fill in more.
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2farfromus; 4someoneelse2solve; bush; darfur; newsconference; notourproblem; sudan
To: rodeocowboy
Please excuse if this is a repeat post; did a search to see if posted elsewhere.
2
posted on
05/08/2006 8:59:58 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: rodeocowboy
Glad he called out the slackers.
To: rodeocowboy
Now, who is Bush siding with. I have limited information from church leaders who state that Christians are being tortured and enslaved by Muslims there. Whose side is he falling on?
4
posted on
05/08/2006 9:01:46 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: rodeocowboy
Don't worry, the UN has it UNDER CONTROL!!!!
5
posted on
05/08/2006 9:01:50 AM PDT
by
zarf
(It's time for a college football playoff system.)
To: zarf
Yeah, the UN will square it all.
To: benjamin032
They'll send their child sex career division in pronto, just as soon as the shooting stops.
7
posted on
05/08/2006 9:04:38 AM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: rodeocowboy
Called on the private sector to donate at www.usaid.gov. He also proposed more money from Congress (which I am totally against - we've spent way too much under this administration). But, I like how he proposed that those Americans that care can also donate. I think all "foreign aid" should come from private donations, NOT forced donations via taxes.
8
posted on
05/08/2006 9:04:51 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: benjamin032
Your right, Sudan is on the United Nations Commission on Human Rights for a reason. ;)
9
posted on
05/08/2006 9:05:21 AM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: rodeocowboy
Bush has been pushing for some sort of action for a long time in Sudan.
10
posted on
05/08/2006 9:05:35 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: rodeocowboy
Now, who is Bush siding with. I have limited information from church leaders who state that Christians are being tortured and enslaved by Muslims there. Whose side is he falling on? What a stupid question!! He is calling on the UN to step in and stop the slaughter.
11
posted on
05/08/2006 9:05:57 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
To: pepperhead
Yeah, them and Iran, a recipe for success.
To: sinkspur
He is calling on the UN to step in and stop the slaughter.
The UN wanted to stop the genocide in Bosnia. Why don't they want to stop the genocide in Sudan? Could it be because Muslims were being killed in Bosnia and Christians are being killed in Sudan?
13
posted on
05/08/2006 9:08:29 AM PDT
by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Ali 'blahblah' Gore's eyes.)
To: rodeocowboy
A very impressive response from the United States to this tragedy; it sounds like other countries aren't stepping up to their responsibilities.
14
posted on
05/08/2006 9:08:36 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Peach
To: rodeocowboy
FEBRUARY 26? +/-, 1999 : (PAKISTANI "ISLAMIC BOMB" NUCLEAR SCIENTIST QADEER KHAN'S GROUP TRAVELS TO NIGER, CHAD AND THEN TO SUDAN WHERE THEY VISITED THE EL SHIFA "ASPIRIN" FACTORY WHICH THE US HAD DESTROYED EARLIER IN A U.S. RAID) After spending a couple of days [in Timbuktu] we were on our way back and our first stop was Niamey, capital of Niger." Siddique also writes that after a stopver at N'Djamena, capital of Chad... they we flew to Khartoum. After Khan had attended to "some business", they visited the Shifa factory that was destroyed by American missiles ... - "Khan made trips to Niger, Sudan," CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA, TIMES NEWS NETWORK, THE TIMES OF INDIA, SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2004 11:52:23 AM , http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow/497486.cms
16
posted on
05/08/2006 9:11:22 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: sinkspur
What a stupid question!! He is calling on the UN to step in and stop the slaughter. Whoa! Cool out! I'm just trying to get filled in on the situation by my conservative brothers and sisters (as you can't trust the liberal media for a fair-take on what's going on).
Whose side are we on?
Why are we taking their side?
Is Bush correct on this (Bush hasn't been very wise over the last few years)?
Etcetera. Etcetera. Are we a little touchy?
17
posted on
05/08/2006 9:12:41 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: piasa
JANUARY 23, 1999 : (WASHINGTON POST REPORTS : RICHARD CLARKE DEFENDS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION'S AUGUST 20, 1998 MISSILE STRIKE ON SUDAN, SAYS IRAQI EXPERTS AT THE EL SHIFA PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT IN SUDAN HAD PRODUCED A POWDERED VX NERVE GAS COMPONENT, ALSO SAID INTEL LINKED BIN LADEN TO IRAQI NERVE GAS EXPERTS AND THE NATIONAL ISLAMIC FRONT IN SUDAN) ...a January 23, 1999, Washington Post article in which Clarke defended the Clinton administration's August 20, 1998, cruise-missile strike on the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan. That mission avenged al Qaeda's demolition of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that August 7, which killed 224 individuals and injured more than 5,000. The Post quoted Clarke as "sure" that Iraqi experts there produced a powdered VX nerve gas component. According to the Post, Clarke "said that intelligence exists linking bin Laden to El Shifa's current and past operators, the Iraqi nerve gas experts and the National Islamic Front in Sudan."-- "Clarkes Not Blind; Even the Dems favorite grandstander sees the Saddam-9/11 link.," By Deroy Murdock, National Review Online , March 26, 2004, 8:58 a.m., http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200403260858.asp
18
posted on
05/08/2006 9:13:09 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: do the dhue
The UN is a worthless organization. Everybody's looking to the US to DO SOMETHING (i.e., military intervention). Why don't the French do something?
19
posted on
05/08/2006 9:14:06 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
To: rodeocowboy
Are we a little touchy?"We" aren't touchy at all.
You're a Bush-basher, looking for another reason to bash.
20
posted on
05/08/2006 9:15:15 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
To: sinkspur
Why don't the French do something?Funny joke. LOL
21
posted on
05/08/2006 9:15:29 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: do the dhue
Actually, both Muslims and Christians are being killed by Muslims in the Sudan. Arab Muslims are attacking black African Muslims, whom they have always regarded as inferior (as you will recall, Arab Muslims were the ones who basically established the slavery industry in Africa, many centuries ago).
22
posted on
05/08/2006 9:16:29 AM PDT
by
livius
To: rodeocowboy
AUGUST 2000 : (REPORTS THAT IRAQ IS FINANCING SCUD MISSILES IN SUDAN, WITH NORTH KOREAN HELP, FOR FUTURE USE BY IRAQ) "
The U.S. intelligence community fears new reports may indicate Iraq is financing construction of a Scud missile assembly plant in Sudan, enlisting North Koreas help, ABCNEWS has learned.
.. Sources say North Korean personnel would build and run the plant, with the assembled Scuds to be held in Sudan for Iraqs future use a prospect that worries U.S. officials.
The intelligence community has two separate reports that indicate such a deal is in the works. If they prove true, it raises significant concerns that Saddam Hussein is back in business trying to make Scud missiles, although outside Iraq.
.." - ABCNews 8/10/00 Barbara Starr
JANUARY 2004 + : (SYRIA HAS BEEN SMUGGLING MISSILE & WMD COMPONENTS INTO SUDAN) LONDON [MENL] -- Syria's Defense Ministry has been smuggling missile and weapons of mass destruction components to Sudan in an apparent effort to conceal them from Western inspection. Western intelligence sources said the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad has been flying shipments of Scud C and Scud D extended-range missiles as well as WMD components to warehouses in Khartoum since at least January 2004. The sources said the Syrian shipments to Khartoum were placed on civilian airliners but authorized and directed by the Defense Ministry. "There is widespread concern in the Syrian regime that Damascus will be the next to face heavy U.S. and international pressure to open its WMD facilities in the wake of the Libyan example," a senior intelligence source said. "The Syrians have decided that they want to take some of their assets out of the country." The intelligence sources said the Sudanese regime of President Omar Bashir was not informed of the Syrian missile and WMD shipments. They said the Syrian material was sent to Khartoum as part of the increased trade relations between the two countries and processed and stored by Sudanese companies.--- "Syria Smuggles Missiles, WMD to Sudan," IMRA, April 9, 2004 , MENL
23
posted on
05/08/2006 9:16:38 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: rodeocowboy
Yes--he is touchy. He is rather famous here for personal attacks over the years. The first thing he does is call someone "stupid" (see above) or worse when he has another opinion. Hasn't changed his act in years...
24
posted on
05/08/2006 9:18:50 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must)
To: Pharmboy
25
posted on
05/08/2006 9:19:46 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
To: piasa
* Hassan al-Turabi : Sudanese strongmana, leader of the al Qaeda-affiliated National Islamic Front.*
* The first meeting in 1992 between the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) and al Qaeda was brokered by [Sudanese strongman Hassan] al-Turabi. Former IIS deputy director Faruq Hijazi and senior al Qaeda leader [Ayman al] Zawahiri were at the meeting--the first of several between 1992 and 1995 in Sudan. - Source : May 2003 debriefing of a senior Iraqi intelligence officer - "Case Closed: The U.S. government's secret memo detailing cooperation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden," by Stephen F. Hayes, Weekly Standard , November 24, 2003 issue, Volume 009, Issue 11
26
posted on
05/08/2006 9:20:02 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: rodeocowboy
I went off `half-cocked' with you a while back. Sorry `bout that.
Good question.
To: Pharmboy
Anyways, aside from PMS'n Sinkspur, what is the synopsis on Sudan and whose side is the USA (President Bush) falling on?
28
posted on
05/08/2006 9:24:20 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: sinkspur; rodeocowboy
All you need do is search on his name and see the testament to his own chronic, unrelenting and unremitting misery sprayed around this forum. Not unlike a skunk spraying his awful-smelling essence all around.
29
posted on
05/08/2006 9:27:08 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must)
To: tumblindice
I went off `half-cocked' with you a while back. Sorry `bout that. Good question.
I don't remember you doing that; but, apology accepted. No matter our views on Bush, we are all (99.9% of us) here because we are conservatives and all love our REPUBLIC. Some of us blindly support Republicans because they have a strategy that makes sense to them; some of us vote on principle and will call out a liberal no matter what party they belong to. But I take none of it personally unless you are demonrat troll which Sinkspur is NOT.
30
posted on
05/08/2006 9:30:06 AM PDT
by
rodeocowboy
(Vote Constitution Party in 2006 to send a message to the Republican Party for 2008!)
To: rodeocowboy
Well, the Arab/Muslims have been attacking, killing, raping and enslaving Christian Sudanese for a while now. The world should have been doing something to stop this, but we're the only ones with the guts to do something, and we have not done much up til now, counting on the UN (bad move).
See here for more info
31
posted on
05/08/2006 9:32:05 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must)
To: rodeocowboy
The Chinese have the big oil contracts there...and are on the Muslim side...
If Christians in the south are sitting on oil land its only a matter of time before they are all killed or converted..
Yes Musilms take Christian children as sex slaves to rape torture mutilate and kill...
They torture and kill adults as well as bomb churches,hospitals and other infrastructure..
Christian teachers and preachers are also targeted for assassinations...
All ignored by Clinton Bush...
War In Sudan
Sudan Gets Chinese Jets
Naturally it's the Muslims who get the jets...not "Sudan"
To: rodeocowboy
He may not be a `demonrat troll', but he's a gold-plated Bush-bot.
He thinks Dubya farts Chanel No. 5.
To: rodeocowboy
Now, who is Bush siding with. I have limited information from church leaders who state that Christians are being tortured and enslaved by Muslims there. Whose side is he falling on?That's the big question...He sided with the muzims against the Christians in Kosovo...Gave them millions of our money...
He's leaning pretty heavy on the side of the terrorists in Israel...More hundreds of millions of our money...
It must be the global balance he's looking for...
34
posted on
05/08/2006 10:00:30 AM PDT
by
Iscool
(You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
To: livius
Interesting
35
posted on
05/08/2006 10:01:07 AM PDT
by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Scarry Belefonte's eyes.)
To: sinkspur
What a stupid question!! He is calling on the UN to step in and stop the slaughter.And how would they do that...The U.N. doesn't have an army...
You mean more Americans wearing blue hats??? Paid for by Americans???
36
posted on
05/08/2006 10:03:20 AM PDT
by
Iscool
(You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
To: rodeocowboy
(Bush hasn't been very wise over the last few years)? Who says? Was it not wise to fight when the U.S. was attacked? Was it not wise to give us tax cuts? Was it not wise to take out Saddam and set up a democracy in the middle East?
Or, do you merely think him unwise because he does not follow the commands of the out of power democratic party?
No answer required - I don't intend to provide a forum for more Bush Bashing.
37
posted on
05/08/2006 10:16:44 AM PDT
by
ClancyJ
(Is the primary goal of our Congress to protect America's borders?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson