Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armoured Suits Are 'Too Goofy' Say US Troops
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5-9-2006 | Francis Harris

Posted on 05/08/2006 6:51:57 PM PDT by blam

Armoured suits are 'too goofy' say US troops

By Francis Harris, in Washington
(Filed: 09/05/2006)

American troops have complained that a new armoured body suit designed to be worn in Iraq makes them look "goofy".

The water-cooled "alien spacesuits" are being handed out to turret gunners in their notoriously vulnerable Humvee vehicles.

The new suit is designed to protect against roadside bombs but has had mixed reviews from soldiers

The protective suit, based on those worn by bomb disposal officers, was intended to cut spiralling casualties for one of the most dangerous jobs in modern warfare.

But some troops have complained that the armour and headgear is inelegant. Others say the water-cooling system, designed for the soaring temperatures of an Iraqi summer, regularly breaks down.

Nonetheless, the suits being tested in combat by US military police units in northern Iraq have produced good results.

Capt Larry Bergeron told the military newspaper Stars and Stripes that the armour was credited with saving the lives of three men sprayed with shrapnel from roadside bombs.

"One soldier's visor stopped a piece of shrapnel that hit dead centre," he said. "If he had not had that suit on, the effects could have been catastrophic."

Gunners on Humvees have high casualty rates. While newly-installed armour protects those inside, the gunner stands with the upper half of his body exposed, making him far more vulnerable to roadside bombs and gunfire. Others have been crushed as vehicles overturn.

But Specialist Michael Floyd, 19, said: "I am not a big fan of this thing. It is really hot and hard to move around in. I do feel safer, but only in an explosion. I would not feel safer in a rollover or in small-arms fire."

Critics say the heavy suits also restrict movement during combat.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armoured; beekeeper; buzzlightyear; gear; goofy; miltech; say; suits; too; toogoofyforwords; troops; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2006 6:51:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

It made me laugh!


2 posted on 05/08/2006 6:53:16 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

LOL!!!!!

There is absolutely no way my son will wear this!


3 posted on 05/08/2006 6:53:54 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

screw that...

I wouldn't have wanted to wear anything like that....

and unless I miss my guess, most of our soldiers in Iraq wouldn't want to wear that stuff either.


4 posted on 05/08/2006 6:54:12 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
However, your daughter may want to obtain this outfit when exposed to male college students.

This is the most outstanding "ANTI-RAPE" device ever invented.

5 posted on 05/08/2006 6:55:55 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
That's what happens when you let women into the military...More concerned about whether their butt looks fat in the new armor than doing what they are told !
6 posted on 05/08/2006 6:55:55 PM PDT by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

OMG. I'd like to see them try to make my Marine Gunny Sergeant son-in-law wear something like that.


7 posted on 05/08/2006 6:57:26 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What's that turtle armor soldier thingie?


8 posted on 05/08/2006 6:59:38 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Super Ninja Turtles!


9 posted on 05/08/2006 7:00:19 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
There is also the glasses worn in Basic Training, the slang terms of which are "Birth Control Glasses" and "Rape Prevention Glasses".

Hey, if it saves lives, it's all good - but I don't think any self-respecting soldier would voluntarily wear one! The guy ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT look like a soldier! It definitely does look like a space suit.

I nwonder what the Iraqis would think if they saw one of those Americans walking around in that.

First it was those infidel Americans, now it's infidels from another planet! What's next???

10 posted on 05/08/2006 7:01:15 PM PDT by tlj18 (Bush and Hu Jintao meeting in Washington, amid grand ceremony... how can I *NOT* think "treason" ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

May look goofy but.. where can i buy a suit? :)


11 posted on 05/08/2006 7:02:23 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
There is absolutely no way my son will wear this!

So if he died tomorrow.....you'd be happy knoing he didnt die looking like a dork?

12 posted on 05/08/2006 7:04:10 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Look like Carhartt's to me and no where near as 'goofy' looking as this:


13 posted on 05/08/2006 7:05:05 PM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1628611/posts?page=15#15 This was mentioned in another post.

I prefer the CROWs system myself. It is much safer for the crew, though it is much more expensive and requires modification to the vehicle. http://www.defense-update.com/products/c/CROWS.htm http://www.roi.bourns.com/weapon/crows.asp http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=7137

Note: All links are open source and approved for distribution.

14 posted on 05/08/2006 7:06:28 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

But do they actually work?

If it works then it may not be so goofy.


15 posted on 05/08/2006 7:07:50 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
They could try to make it look more...intimidating. That said, I wouldn't object to wearing it in that role (unless it severely restricted gunnery ability).

Could be worse.

16 posted on 05/08/2006 7:07:50 PM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

But do they actually work?

If it works then it may not be so goofy.


17 posted on 05/08/2006 7:07:51 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans

He would


18 posted on 05/08/2006 7:08:23 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
I believe that suit would be suitable or apropos for East Los Angeles, California, Detroit, Michigan, New Orleans, Louisiana and most cities on the East Coast.
19 posted on 05/08/2006 7:10:31 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlj18
EOD does where something like this while performing their duties of bomb disposal.

For the average soldier in a combat environment, this would cause more casualties than it could prevent. If anything, it may actually case some deaths.

The ability to rapidly move and locate shelter (hide behind a wall), is a soldier's best form of protection.

However, as an "ANTI-RAPE" device for our military women in Iraq, this outfit may be useful.

20 posted on 05/08/2006 7:10:44 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
most of our soldiers in Iraq wouldn't want to wear that stuff either>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It DOES look like a bomb disposal suit but it could be the difference between life and death. I would wear it, and get damn good wearing it too.Stylin and dyin is no match for livin and killin.

Dead is for a very long time.

21 posted on 05/08/2006 7:12:01 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker
One Picture didn't post and there are actually 3 links "linked" together. It didn't look that way on the preview...

CROWS is a remotely operated system. The gunner sits inside the vehicle (Stryker, HMMWV, M113) and operates the system from a flat screen panel using a joystick. It is very accurate, and accepts and crew-served weapon.

Again, these are all open source links.

22 posted on 05/08/2006 7:12:17 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam

It looks really hot.


23 posted on 05/08/2006 7:13:22 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

if it isn't for the IED troops (who do an awesome job by the way), I doubt many would want to use it.

Not being able to move won't help you anymore than any piece of armor....


24 posted on 05/08/2006 7:15:45 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam
They should put some thin metal plates on the outside to make it look more like a suit of armor. Cost in weight ... maybe 5 pounds with 18 gauge steel. Then the troops will want it.

Maybe mount some oversized horns on the helmet and there ya go.

25 posted on 05/08/2006 7:20:19 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Looks distinctly French

26 posted on 05/08/2006 7:32:28 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"BWAHAHAHAHA! No! No, Abdul! I cannot shoot American. He's too cute! He looks like the Michelin Man! BWAHAHAHAHA!"

Seriously, if it works, use it.

27 posted on 05/08/2006 7:33:00 PM PDT by manwiththehands (No, usted no puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

Actually the glasses they make you wear in basic training are the most effective "Anti Rape" or "Anti-Date" device ever made.


28 posted on 05/08/2006 7:43:22 PM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home will be North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
If it works then it may not be so goofy.

Exactly.

As a (poor) analogy - when I was in high school and played football, the end of our season was always bitterly cold. As a lineman who didn't need to touch the ball, I would always layer up with wool socks, long johns, hat underneath helmet, etc. Didn't affect mobility, but initially had guys laughing at me. I say initially, because after 5 minutes of being outside my teammates didn't think I looked so goofy any more.

29 posted on 05/08/2006 7:50:08 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

Reminds me of the automatic machine guns used in "Aliens", when the Marines were holed up in that one section of the base, they set up 2 automated guns that had radar which would lock onto anything moving and blast it. Really cool effect. Always wondered why we didn't see similar weapons (particularly with the abundance of 1st person shooter games - technology couldn't be that far behind).


30 posted on 05/08/2006 7:52:43 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blam
Michelin Man
31 posted on 05/08/2006 8:04:07 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

IED survivability aside, what happens when the water cooled ECU pukes out? You become a bubble boy heat casualty and put your other team members at risk as they deal with your problem. I'm guessing that the design engineers of this contraption didn't personally don the suit at the test range to evaluate their dream child...maybe illegal aliens did it for them instead.


32 posted on 05/08/2006 8:05:36 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

33 posted on 05/08/2006 8:09:46 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

D'ya think we could somehow sucker Kerry into one of these to go along with his other stupid pics?


34 posted on 05/08/2006 8:11:35 PM PDT by Politicalmom (If fences don't work, why is there a fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

Aren't they supposed to install that remote control system on the Abrams as well?


35 posted on 05/08/2006 8:16:22 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat


36 posted on 05/08/2006 8:17:40 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: blam

"Klaatu barada nikto"

37 posted on 05/08/2006 8:18:57 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

38 posted on 05/08/2006 8:21:15 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Natural Selection is the Free Market : Intelligent Design is the Centrally Planned Economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The protective suit, based on those worn by bomb disposal officers, was intended to cut spiralling casualties for one of the most dangerous jobs in modern warfare.

...although the wearers are condemned to be virgins for the rest of their days, there is an upside: they suddenly acquired the ability to program computers.

39 posted on 05/08/2006 8:24:28 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
Some M1A2 SEP come from the factory with them.

Others are retrofitted

But I have no idea of the number of either. Also, note that many tankers in the sandbox are driving around in Humvees

40 posted on 05/08/2006 8:25:31 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
The TUSK system has a remote gun for the commander. It is similar to the CROWS. The loader has thermal imaging systems with VR goggles (which are REALLY cool, no sarcasm, they really are).


41 posted on 05/08/2006 8:31:32 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

Thank you sir. That's the pic I knew I have somewhere...


42 posted on 05/08/2006 8:39:06 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
if it isn't for the IED troops (who do an awesome job by the way), I doubt many would want to use it. Not being able to move won't help you anymore than any piece of armor....

The target users are turret gunners, who don't have a lot of mobility anyway.
43 posted on 05/08/2006 8:42:03 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
Actually, the automated guns are already here. They are not autonomous, but they are able to act from secured remote controls.

First is the MULE UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle) which will have a gun/missle system in the ARV-L model.

Thes UGVs range in size from the small I-Robot Packbot to vehicles as large as a tank. Kinda like the "Bolos" from the Sci-fi books series. UAVs range in size now from papaer airplane dimensions with a small camera, to Helicopters, to the Global Hawk.

44 posted on 05/08/2006 8:44:18 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: blam
The effort should continue towards developing such a protective suit. However, it should allow freedom of movement and keep on cool.

We can make fun of its appearance, but it it saves just one from serious injury or loss of life, it will be worth it.

45 posted on 05/08/2006 8:45:35 PM PDT by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why not just put a bulletproof glass bubble with a machine gun over the hole. Kindof like those machine gunners in the B17's during WW2. I think they were B17's, I have no clue what plane that was.

the point is that would protect the soldier from bullets and roadside bombs and if the vehicle was disabled and he had to exit quickly he could just jump out and be able to fight with average Marine efficiency.


46 posted on 05/08/2006 8:45:37 PM PDT by Ainast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

I always though a revolver was the most effective anti-rape device.


47 posted on 05/08/2006 8:48:16 PM PDT by Ainast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

A Scott AirPak on an EOD suit...I could see doing something real delicate - like cutting the blue wire...when the bell starts to go off...


48 posted on 05/08/2006 8:52:45 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Those who "abjure" violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam

If they work, who cares what they look like? Better to look goofy than to be dead.


49 posted on 05/08/2006 9:06:21 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think it's a pretty good idea if it has a good fuctional cooling system and can stop bullets effectively enough . Fragments from a roadside bomb or other explosive elements ( IE. RPGs , grenades ) do not seem to be a problem for a suit like that . High powered rifle / machine gun rounds are a different story ... snipers suck ! By the way , could a Humvee mount the Crow system ok without losing too much interior space ? They don't seem to have much room to spare .


50 posted on 05/08/2006 9:27:58 PM PDT by Stoli Strafemeister (Why is the vodka gone ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson