Skip to comments.
Reducing Secondhand Smoke Would Slash Heart Disease Rates, Study Says
fox ^
| 5/9/6
| jenny warner
Posted on 05/09/2006 9:22:14 PM PDT by LouAvul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: Moonman62
You mean the freedom to pollute the air with your toxic smoke? That's the one. Sorta like your freedom to be somewhere else.
21
posted on
05/09/2006 10:06:12 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1100 knives and counting!)
To: LouAvul
...and not breathing would reduce the chance of inhaling any airborne dust, mold spores and viruses.
22
posted on
05/09/2006 10:08:46 PM PDT
by
markedman
(Islam means surrender, and I will NEVER surrender!)
To: LouAvul
Using a model to estimate the impact......
The global warming style "model" is always a nice touch. I don't smoke and I don't care to have it blown in my direction (smells bad) but the objective truth is that the second hand smoke scare is nonsense.
23
posted on
05/09/2006 10:09:55 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Even with a paddle, shit creek ain't no picnic.)
To: Moonman62
You mean the freedom to pollute the air with your toxic smoke? If the owner of a bar doesn't mind people smoking therein, why should that be a concern of yours?
24
posted on
05/09/2006 10:10:54 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: supercat
Because it's a business open to the public, that's why. For the same reason I want that business to be compliant with fire and health codes.
25
posted on
05/09/2006 10:12:20 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Ramius
It's not the same, and that's why we see more regulation of smoking.
26
posted on
05/09/2006 10:13:37 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: RHINO369
Now if they are going to ban cigarettes Though of course you know that'll never happen. Cigarette companies only make about 15 to 25 cents a pack... but states make a buck to a buck fifty or more per pack. They can't afford to ban them. They don't even really want usage to go down. They'd panic.
27
posted on
05/09/2006 10:13:43 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1100 knives and counting!)
To: Moonman62
So don't buy in that store. The nanny state continued...
Where oh where is America, land of the free and home of the brave?
28
posted on
05/09/2006 10:14:29 PM PDT
by
markedman
(Islam means surrender, and I will NEVER surrender!)
To: LouAvul
WHO Study on the Rush 24/7 stack of stuff says that there is no illness from second hand smoke. Uncomfortable and smelly but no direct harm.
29
posted on
05/09/2006 10:15:14 PM PDT
by
Bronzy
To: LouAvul
WHO Study on the Rush 24/7 stack of stuff says that there is no illness from second hand smoke. Uncomfortable and smelly but no direct harm.
30
posted on
05/09/2006 10:15:27 PM PDT
by
Bronzy
To: Blzbba
Next up - FAT PEOPLE!
What about ugly people. How can you enjoy a meal at a nice restaurant when your seated by some ugly person? They should at least have ugly sections. And what if they're wearing stinky perfume? Or garish clothes? Or have a grating voice? Jayne Meadows laughs always annoys me. And what about........
To: LouAvul
32
posted on
05/09/2006 10:16:29 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: Moonman62
You mean the freedom to pollute the air with your toxic smoke?Are you a smoker?
33
posted on
05/09/2006 10:17:00 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: Bronzy
Gee, I'm sorry. I posted x2. How did that happen? Geesh!
34
posted on
05/09/2006 10:17:59 PM PDT
by
Bronzy
To: Moonman62
yeah... like here in WA where they banned smoking in bars recently. Bars are going under all over.
The best sign was on the outside of a struggling bar somewhere north of Seattle: "Nonsmokers: Where ARE you?"
It's not about people that didn't want to be around smoke. They aren't going to such places even now that they're nonsmoking. It's merely about controlling the habits of others of which they smugly disapprove. It's about control.
35
posted on
05/09/2006 10:18:39 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1100 knives and counting!)
To: Jaysun
Its not a "scare" in the sense Y2K or Global Warming is a scare. Its just that other Conservatives dont want to inhale that nasty gunk when they're eating. And they shouldn't have to. Hope the police start ticketing them for it. Maybe then they'll think twice.
36
posted on
05/09/2006 10:21:26 PM PDT
by
Windsong
(Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
To: Ramius
yeah... like here in WA where they banned smoking in bars recently. Bars are going under all over. Most of the bars around me are non-smoking and business is great. Location seems to be the biggest predictor of success for a bar, just like other businesses.
37
posted on
05/09/2006 10:22:04 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Moonman62
Because it's a business open to the public, that's why. For the same reason I want that business to be compliant with fire and health codes. If the bar owner wants to put up a sign saying "Moonman62 is not welcome here", can he not do so? If the bar owner does so, what would it matter to you whether he allows smoking?
If the owner of a business does want you to be there, you have no right to stay. Consequently, you have no right to demand that the owner of a business conduct his operations to your liking. If you wanted to argue that a business that allows smoking should post a sign on the door indicating the existence of possibly-harmful fumes inside, I might give you that. But nobody forces anyone to go into a smoky bar who doesn't want to.
38
posted on
05/09/2006 10:22:16 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: Moonman62
Because it's a business open to the public... Tell you what... let's have one bar in town for people that want to smoke, and we can have another whole bar for smug power freaks... then we can both be happy. What say?
39
posted on
05/09/2006 10:22:33 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1100 knives and counting!)
To: markedman
You need to form your own state, like Smoketana.
40
posted on
05/09/2006 10:23:19 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson