Posted on 05/10/2006 10:20:34 AM PDT by Tolik
Not too long ago, there was a lot of giggling on the right side of the blogosphere when it learned about a book called Why Mommy is a Democrat, which its publisher proudly boasts is A Different Kind of Childrens Book. The books point is that, just as a child views Mommy in a saintly light, he should project that view onto Democrats because they share Mommys values. For example, just as Mommies do, Democrats make sure people share. And so that no one misses this message, the well-dressed, silver-haired, obviously Republican white folk in the background walk by a homeless man with noses upturned. Likewise, just as Mommy does, Democrats make sure everyone can go to school, while those same pompous white Republicans allow in only the rich.
Probably because it is so rich in venom and stereotyping, Why Mommy is a Democrat has not made much of an impact the publishing world. Its self-published, and I wasnt even able to find it on Amazon.com. Conservatives are actually doing better in this area. Help! Mom! There are Liberals Under My Bed is actually sold through Amazon, although it places at a wan 5,700 in the Amazon rankings.
The push to get children to think in politically correct ways doesnt stop with books. Just recently, Hollywood released Hoot, a somewhat turgid movie about children learning lessons in eco-terrorism. (Even the New York Times, while it liked the message, admitted the movie had little to offer in the way of enjoyment.)
These books and movies remind us how boring polemics are. You have to appreciate these heavy-handed attempts at pop culture indoctrination, however, because those on the Left are fighting an uphill battle when it comes to our kids.
You think Im kidding? Im not. In the last five years, through a series of rousing movies and books, our children have been introduced to some of the best conservative thinking ever put to paper or put on film.
In 2001, Hollywood released The Lord of the Rings : The Fellowship of the Ring, based on the first part J.R.R. Tolkiens Ring trilogy. The movie was a blockbuster hit, and is currently the thirteenth most profitable movie ever made. It also wholeheartedly affirms traditional Victorian values: honor, loyalty, bravery and steadfastness. More than that, the movies story acknowledges that evil exists and recognizes that the only thing to be done against evil is to attack it, root and branch. A war against evil is a total war, from which one cannot walk away.
Unsurprisingly, therefore, The Fellowship of the Ring has no talk about trying to understand Sarumans unhappy childhood as a way of exonerating his evil acts. Even Boromirs manifest unhappiness is not an excuse for the envy in his heart something he himself recognizes at the end, when he sacrifices himself to save the Fellowship. The two subsequent movies in the Ring Trilogy ( The Two Towers and The Return of the King) keep up the same steady drumbeat: honor, loyalty, steadfastness, and the recognition that evil cannot be destroyed with half measures.
In 2003, the same year Hollywood released Return of the King (which is the second highest grossing movie ever made), Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix came out. To date, this book has sold 13.7 million copies in the United States alone (including a one day sales record of 5 million books in 24 hours). This popularity, obviously, didnt arise in isolation. It was a logical result of the Harry Potter juggernaut that began in 1989, and that has been increasing ever since (helped by some very popular movies). Im focusing in this article on the Order of the Phoenix, though, because its very different from the Harry Potter books that preceded it.
As the reviewers noted when Order of the Phoenix first came out, this book is much darker than its predecessors . In the earlier Harry Potter books, there was always a rather giddy, Boys Life adventure quality to the books. Voldemort was out there, but merely as You Know Who. We got a glimpse of him in each book, but nothing really serious that is, until the very end of the book immediately preceding the Order of the Phoenix. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Voldemort emerged, fully formed. The problem was that only Harry lived to see Voldemort and his Death Eaters resurgent.
In the wake of Voldemorts perverted resurrection, The Order of the Phoenix centers on Harrys desperate efforts to convince the Powers That Be that evil once again walks among them. What Harry discovers is that nobody wants to hear him. He is reviled as a liar, attention seeker, and trouble-maker. Dolores Umbridge, who is the ultimate smug bureaucrat, with grim smiles mires Harry in endless, aimless tasks, all intended to reduce his ability to focus on Voldemorts existence. Only with tremendous effort is he able to rally some believers to his side and prepare them for war.
I dont pretend to know what J.K. Rowling was thinking when she wrote Order of the Phoenix, but I cant help but see in this post-9/11 book a perfect analogy to the situation the West faces today, in the real world, in its War against Islamofascism. Some of us, like Harry, know that we have seen evil, acknowledge its existence, and are prepared to fight it. But just as Harry must deal with a government Ministry bound and determined to explain away or ignore the evil in its midst, we too face an anti-War movement that endlessly ignores, explains away, and excuses the most vile acts of terror and human degradation. I have to believe, however, that there are at least some young people who experienced the Twin Towers falling as the formative event of their youth, and who will find guidance and inspiration in Harrys struggle to wage overcome both evil itself and a cultural indifference to that same evil.
Rowlings dark tone continues unabated indeed, it deepens in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (which has sold a breathtaking 20 million copies just in the United States). As Half-Blood Prince begins, the denouement in Order of the Phoenix, which saw Harry and his allies at the Ministry of Magic engaged in a pitched battle against Voldemort and his Death Eaters, has finally convinced the governing forces in the Wizard world that there is a real problem.
Theres an awful lot of plot in Half-Blood Prince that simply moves the characters forward, but the book also contains a powerful defense of a just war. Near the books end, Harry questions whether its worthwhile engaging in a fight so destructive to the Wizarding community. Dumbledore will have none of this. Essentially, he tells Harry that, in the battle between Good and Evil, those on the side of Good cannot give up, but must press ahead, knowing that they are doing the right thing. Again, I cant think of any better message for countless young people throughout the Western world to read. Some, at least, will figure out that, despite the worldwide medias negative drumbeat regarding America and her military, true evil resides in those who gleefully torture and murder in the name of their God.
The last of the big pop culture hits that I hope will infuse our children with conservative values is, of course, The Chronicles of Narnia : The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. Although this movie doesnt quite rank with the revenue numbers for the Ring trilogy or the Harry Potter movies, it has already earned a respectable $291,706,092 in the United States. Indeed, for 2005 releases, it placed second only to the most recent Star Wars movie.
When it came out, the Narnia movie was much praised for its allegorical retelling of Christs death and resurrection. I have also noted its reaffirmation of traditional masculine values. What no one has yet addressed is that, as with the Ring movies and the Harry Potter series, this movie not only emphasizes those old-fashioned virtues of loyalty, bravery, steadfastness, it also does away with moral relativism, recognizes evil, and honors the fight against it.
The Narnia movie has one other virtue: its has spurred a new generation to read the entire series of C.S. Lewis Narnia books. The books are wonderful adventure stories, but they also have one peculiar twist. The last book The Last Battle imagines the end of the world, complete with an Armageddon type battle; a Judgment Day; the destruction of the world as we (or, rather, the Narnians) know it; and a glorious eternal Paradise. Ive always found it a very satisfying book.
In recent years, though, Ive also found The Last Battle rather surprisingly relevant to modern times. This is because the adversaries whose invasion of Narnia triggers the Apocalypse are essentially Muslims. Lewis calls them Calormen, but it is clear that hes pulled their manners and values right out of A Thousand and One Nights. This means that, back in 1956 when Lewis wrote this book, his imagination carried him to a place in which Muslim-like people attack the West and usher in the end of the world. This is an especially eerie premise given President Ahmadinejads outspoken Messianic delusions and apocaplyptic visions, most of which center on immolating Israel, but many of which include America in the flames.
As both a parent and a former child, Ive discovered that you can feed children a tremendous amount of pap, in the form of silly rock songs, vapid movies, and endless American Idol contests without affecting their core inner values. That is, while these products wont enrich our children, they wont harm them either. Some things, though, do matter. It is therefore a great comfort to me that the most popular and compelling products our children devour affirm values that will aid America in the fight against the Islamist forces arrayed against us.
Bookworm is the pseudonym of the proprietor of the webiste Bokworm Room. She lives as a crypto-conservative.
Bookworm

Well written. Well met indeed.
Great article. Thanks for a good post.
Chillbumps good! Thank you!
Very good article.
We are in a fight to the end. The only question is which side most will choose.
Very good article.
We are in a fight to the end. The only question is which side most will choose.
The point is that approaches such as "SUV's bad, kids good, let's blow 'em up" is simply not capable of reaching the deeper emotional and intellectual chords struck by a Gandalf or an Aslan even within quite young children. Art tells.
I do not personally share the author's enthusiasm for The Last Battle - it's brilliant from a Christian perspective but inherently dark and, I think, not entirely appropriate for young children. It is, after all, about the death of their beautiful fantasy world and the afterlife for those who choose belief. That's some mighty heavy lifting for a kids' movie. I doubt it will be made but I might be wrong.
Prince Caspian, however, evidently will be next which is logical enough given that it requires the present cast to be pretty much their present ages. Harry Potter is doing astoundingly well dealing with the advancing age of its cast (IMHO) but five years' delay for Caspian would probably be a bit too much to incorporate into the plot. It is also fairly light on the Christian metaphors, at least as Narnia goes. Looking forward to it.
IIRC, Rowling has made disparaging remarks about President Bush as documented here at FR, therefore her books are either unconciously about the gathering storm of Isalmofascism or they are conciously about another slowly, creeping Evil (at least in her mind) as exemplified by President Bush and the dark evil Republicans/Conservatives.
I don't think her books are about Islam or Bush. But as it often happens with the real art, they transcend the here and now. Her books are about good versus evil. As "simple" as that. And here comes my BUT: because progressives reject this "simplistic" notion of good and evil, her books become conservative almost by default (regardless of what she herself might have in mind, as long as she keeps writing real literature).
If I wanted to assign a historical analogy, I'd say they are more like the immediate WWII years in Britain than the present.
Make that immediate pre-WWII years.
I haven't actually read it through, yet, just thought it might be of interest.
"The push to get children to think in politically correct ways doesnt stop with books." Duly noted that the lickspittlist author of the propaganda book ignores in passing the millions and millions of children the author's demigods of the democrap party have vigorously helped to snuff out. I wonder, do ya suppose a children's book addressed to the aborted children would sell? Bwahahaha, not to democraps. Oops! Not at all funny is it!
I agree with you here.
I think the Potter books are more about Hitler than about contemporary politics.
However, there is another Christian theme running through the Potter books that seems lost to a lot of people, and that is that power and intelligence are not sufficient to defeat evil. In the end, evil will be defeated by love.
At the end of LOTR, love and good intentions are not sufficient. I have no idea how Rowling will resolve her crisis, but she claims to have written the final chapter years ago.
Not necessarily. In OOTP, the Ministry flat out denied the premise. In HBP, they were forced to admit the possibility of Voldemort returning to power but they tried to devalue the fact they were wrong.
Anyone who has worked for a large corporation has lived these two books. I remember a corporate officer denying something with great vigor until an audio tape surfaced that proved him wrong. Then the truth was passed over in favor of what to do about audio tapes. The source of the audio tape became the big problem, not the subject of the tape. See the Monica scandal for a good example of this.
I imagine that the ministry view this as a "Potter problem" because it is easier to deal with Potter than Voldemort. Just as the media found it easier to attack Linda Tripp than Bill Clinton.

The thing that makes the Potter books great is their ability to connect with things everyone knows or has seen. The style isn't exactly Shakespeare, but the content trancends time and place.
There was an interesting critical analysis of the Harry Potter series a few years back (can't remember where; Natl. Rev.?; I think it was linked to here on FR) that went through all the veiled, allegorical Biblical and Christian imagery in the books up to that point in time.
It doesn't take a wizard to find allegories in Potter. All you have to do is read what the author says. The details of the ending are secret, but the moral message has been hammered from the beginning.
ping
"should project that view onto Democrats because they share Mommys values. For example, just as Mommies do, Democrats make sure people share."
--- I thought that democrats had two mommies
I thought the point of LOTR (among many) were that the pity of Bilbo and later Frodo were what saved middle Earth, as the ring would have been recovered by the Dark Lord without Gollum.
Tolkien rejected LOTR as a WWII parable, as he stated that Gandalf and the others would have used the ring to try to destroy the Dark Lord, instead of trying to destroy it themselves (atomic bomb).
In the end, Frodo fails. They are saved by grace.
I don't know how Harry Potter ends, but Harry so far has been more well intentioned than strong or wise.
I'm 90% certain Harry dies, in a way that destroys Voldie and saves Malfoy. I think the "last chapter" JKR pre-wrote is a "long and happy life" chapter that basically gives the 2 sentence post story life of all the surviving main and semi-main characters.
Yeah, I have the feeling we have been reading the Legend of Harry Potter.
Pernally, I'd let the little rat live so I could milk some more money from him but that's me.
By the time the 7th book, 7th movie, and 7th computer games are all done I don't think there's going to be any more money left to milk. If Rowling transfered all her assets to an American bank account she could replace the Fed.
Good way to kill the rest of the movies. I highly doubt it.
I think it is more likely that Snape, Neville, or Malfoy saves the day.
Thanks for the ping! My oldest daughter has finally reached an age where she can read the Harry Potter books. SHe is really enjoying them. We checked out the books and tapes so she can read along to the tapes in the kitchen. That way I get to listen to the tapes as I cook. :) Selfish of me isn't it? :)
*ahem* She never said which president the PM was expecting a call from, nor what country that president represented.
With her taking another year off before even starting book 7 she's going to have to write fast to finish book 7 before their current production cycle would release book 7. I think the book and movie will come out very near each other, I think they'll be scripting the movie based on her notes rather than the completed book.
I think Snape, Neville and Malfoy (which is part of why I think Harry will save Malfoy's life in defeating Voldy, Malfoy's inaction at the end of 6 puts him on a path of serious jeopardy) will help but it's going to be Harry that throws the final spell. Though I admit there is a compelling argument that Neville is actually the prophecy fulfiller so I won't be entirely suprised if that happens.
BTW, would you please put me on the ping list, pretty please?
LMAO!! I can just imagine. "Maybe I saved it under...no, that's not it. Maybe...wrong again..."
BTW, would you please put me on the ping list, pretty please?
You're already on! Did I screw it up and you didn't get pinged?
I found the thread on my own, and didn't scroll down far enough on my pings list to see your ping.
*sigh* It's gonna be one of those lives...
Somebody will be along shortly to explain why reading Harry Potter will send you to Hell.
She's writing book 7 now. It's supposed to come out sometime next year around late summer/early fall. Harry's birthday July 31st maybe?
LOL!! ((((null and void))))
That's a change from what I heard originally which was that like with book 6 she was going to take a year off, and even without that year off book 6 took forever. Maybe the juices started flowing before she thought.
Late summer next year works, between the theatrical and DVD release of movie 5.
OOTP should be out shortly thereafter. Book 7 release date is also Jo's birthday,I think.
Thanks for the ping.
Keep in mind it's the latest rumor, so it could completely change. Allegedly book 7 and movie 5 are supposed to be released fairly close together. But, it's really just rumor for now.
7/7/07
So that would mean we hit the jackpot? ;-)
Wait, but I thought Harry was the antichrist? ;-)
HA! I guess so!!
Release date I've seen for movie 5 is June 2007, which keeps with their current cycle of 18ish months November and June releases.
Actually, according to Domestic all time hits, Narnia actually beat Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
'e got better...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.