Posted on 05/10/2006 3:42:30 PM PDT by k8baller
Bush is ruining Tony Blair’s career By Amitabh Pal May 9, 2006
Prime Minister Tony Blair’s “special relationship” with President Bush could very spell finis for his career.
Blair is in trouble for a major cabinet reshuffle, the highlight being the firing of Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. A column in the London Independent asserts that Straw was dropped because of his opposition to a U.S. military assault on Iran. Straw had labeled the idea of a U.S. nuclear strike on Iran as “nuts” and had said that British action against Iran was “inconceivable.” Apparently, Bush wasn’t too amused.
The cabinet rearrangement was also due to the Labor Party’s dismal recent showing in local elections, which has added pressure for Tony Blair to step down. Blair had pledged during last year’s parliamentary elections to hand over power to Gordon Brown, currently the chancellor of exchequer, but has since then in Clintonesque fashion (Clinton being a good friend and political mentor) refused to be pinned down on exactly when he’ll be doing so.
The Iraq War has been one of the major reasons for the profound disillusionment with Blair’s leadership among the British electorate.
Derek Wyatt, a Member of Parliament from Blair’s Labor Party, was quoted in the Washington Post as saying that Blair’s support for Bush’s Iraq debacle has cost him dearly.
“I've been listening to people in my constituency very carefully for a couple of years,” Wyatt said. “And they'd like to see a change at the top.”
Indeed, Blair’s enthusiasm for the Iraq invasion severely damaged him during the parliamentary elections last year, causing his party’s majority in the House of Commons to be reduced by almost 100 seats.
This was in spite of the fact that the economy was performing quite well, with unemployment rates and interest rates both low. Blair has also had some other genuine achievements, notably in the devolution of power to Scotland and Wales. But all this paled beside his decision to go along with Bush’s Iraq attack.
Why did he do it? Speculation has ranged from the view that Blair regards the British-U.S. relationship as sacrosanct to the notion that he hoped to steer Bush toward a more internationalist approach to the Iraq crisis. But a recent revelation suggests that Blair may share Bush’s religious fervor on the issue. In a March television appearance, Blair suggested that God ordained the Iraq War.
“I think if you have faith about these things then you realize that judgment is made by other people,” Blair said. “By other people, by, if you believe in God, it’s made by God as well.”
In these comments, Blair subtly echoed Bush’s assertions that God had asked him to invade Iraq.
His bitter political experience due to Iraq seems to have finally chastened Blair’s enthusiasm for Bush’s military adventurism. In his press conference after the cabinet reshuffle debacle, Blair ruled out a nuclear option for Iran. “I don't know anybody who has even talked or contemplated the prospect of a nuclear strike in Iran, and that would be absolutely absurd,” he said.
Let’s hope that for once Blair is being truthful. If Blair gives any more support to Bush’s foreign policy disasters, it may finally put a full stop to his already imperiled political career.
You just joined up today to post this crap? How old are you? Twelve?
You're back!!!!
Would you like yourself rare, medium, or well done?
I'd like my troll well done please.
Of course, EVERY day is Slow Day over there.
Don't you have to spin Patches Kennedy's TWO drunken driving escapades or complain about "burger flipping jobs" or start the 986th Diebold thread or something?
im trying to eduacte
Don't ya know....everything is Bush's fault.
You have pimples and a low IQ..blame Bush.
Your wife is leaving you...blame Bush.
Bratty kids.....blame Bush.
Why take responsibility for self when it is so much easier to blame Bush? /s
Whine a little bit louder now.
More reason to love Blair. He did the right thing even though it cost him. Bravo, Blair!
"You just joined up today to post this crap? How old are you? Twelve?" hahahahahahahahahahahah. Thanks for the laugh.
You might want to work on that.
I thought you were banned?
Isn't that special. By you logic, Franklin Roosevelt ruined Winston Churchill's career.
ROFLMAO!
Blair's foes should move to their comfort zone-- Paris.
You moron.
It's not working, but it is funny and sort of scary at the same time.
Isn't it amazing? Bush has a 31% approval here and probably a 1% approval in Britain and he can still influence the Labour Cabinet and have Tony Blair do his bidding. Now THAT'S power...
Blair's career is ruined for reasons much closer to home. NHS, Prescott's a loose cannon (in more ways than one) who hasn't been sacked, and IIRC correctly, Labour bit the big one in local elections. Of course Cameron has led the Tories down a primrose path if you ask me. Bring back Michael Howard!! ;)
That is just funny! How true.
You amuse me..............................now go away.
Didn't Blair win reelection the same as Bush?
Well now, isn't that special!
Fornicate you and the gay horse you rode in on, Scooter.
You moron.
You know, sometimes the simple approach is best: Your response made me laugh out loud. Well done!
How can you do it if you can't even spell it?
Got to love the hit and run trolls, they make a boring news day a bit more exciting.
Let's not bring the Kennedys into this again, puhleeze. ;)
'It's not working, but it is funny and sort of scary at the same time."
LOL true so true
Give the border issue a rest already and have some fun.
"im trying to eduacte"
Straw-man arguements are not educational, they are propaganda. Learn the difference. Also, learn how to spell eduacte. I'm series.
;-)
Youve been ZOTTED!!!!
If they could sink it in a lake of booze it would be surrealistically perfect.
"eduacte"
The internet is now closed. no more need be said.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
We're being over-run with trolls.
I've posted this many times, but for those who haven't seen it:
Jim Robinson wrote the foreward for a book called Hillary's Secret War. Free Republic is mentioned prominently in the book.
It details how leftists come to sites like this one, sign up, post as conservatives for a while to establish their credentials, and then, when they see an opportunity, start to turn the conservative base against Republicans.
Jim Robinson was able to follow where posters were coming from and in the 90's, lots and lots of posters were pretending to be conservatives but were actually posting from the Clinton White House and Washington Post, etc.
Its ok, the Brits could use another Thatcher, Blair is pretty liberal.
No kidding? I'll have to read that.
Also, I wonder what percentage of DUmmy-land is made of FReepers doing the same??
It's a very illuminating read and taught me a lot about how sites like this get infiltrated by the left. Of course, we're also seeing more and more third party lovers. You know - those 2-3% candidates? LOL
I know. Isn't it amazing how low people will stoop to screw with someone? What a waste of a life!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.