Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Building 370 miles of fence is worse than building no fence at all. It will simply encourage illegals to travel through the desert to locations where there isn't a fence. It will simply result in the deaths of more illegals, but it won't stop them from coming.

To be effective, the fence HAS to cover most or ALL of the border to completely discourage border crossings.

Perhaps this is a start, but considering how difficult it was just to get 370 miles approved, it is not encouraging that more miles of fence will be built.


21 posted on 05/17/2006 12:43:26 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kidd
Building 370 miles of fence is worse than building no fence at all. It will simply encourage illegals to travel through the desert to locations where there isn't a fence. It will simply result in the deaths of more illegals, but it won't stop them from coming.

This is the Senate playing games with the House. They do not want to give them the full 700 miles the House voted for unless they get something in return...like amnesty.
75 posted on 05/17/2006 1:27:40 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: kidd
Building 370 miles of fence is worse than building no fence at all.

I disagree. 370 is the minimum, the House-senate conference can and likely will up it substantially. It's a start and wouldn't exist at all if the base was a bunch of passive patsies, like some freepers advocate.

98 posted on 05/17/2006 2:30:23 PM PDT by Maynerd (Defeat Bush's "Leave no Mexican Behind" immigration "reform")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: kidd

Some fences are already there. There is a 23 mile fence south of San Diego on the border. There are other sections as well. All a fence does is act a force multiplier and it funnels the illegals to areas where we can control and detect them. There are also parts of the border that don't need fencing due the terrain, access, etc. This is a good start.

It is obvious by the votes that this is a sop to the conservative Reps who are really serious about border control, so they can vote for the final bill. I hope the House stands its grounds about citizenship. Although not desireable, I would accept some sort of permanent residency by never citizenship. You can't reward illegal behavior.

105 posted on 05/17/2006 2:54:45 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson