Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union to Replace USA? ("is this the plan?" alert!)
HumanEventsOnline.com ^ | 5/19/2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; barkingmoonbats; blackhelicopters; bordersecurity; cfr; corsi; delusions; illegalimmigation; kookism; kooks; koolaid; moonbats; nafta; nau; northamerica; northamericanunion; nutcases; oneworldgovernment; partnership; prosperity; security; sovereignty; spp; supercorridor; tinfoil; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,401-1,427 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:05 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

WTH? I'm not sure if I should search for my tinfoil or duck from the looming black helicopter across from my lawn.


2 posted on 05/19/2006 6:59:07 AM PDT by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada

Uh . . . NAFTA already DOES include Canada.
3 posted on 05/19/2006 6:59:14 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

He'd have a helluva lot of work to do with only two years left in his term (barring John Conyers).

4 posted on 05/19/2006 7:00:22 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Exactly. And the fact that Bush has been pursuing this agenda without telling the US people, is worse than despicable.


5 posted on 05/19/2006 7:01:22 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagar
same thing is happening here in Europe -->>> European Union

seems, there are more moves on the globe to create similar kinds of regional 'authorities'

soon, all that is needed is a world government on top of all these regional 'Unions', and we just happen to have a UN about... world government might not be far away, think 15-20 years, tops.

how about that for a conspiracy theory?

6 posted on 05/19/2006 7:01:29 AM PDT by Palpatine (The lesson of modern politics is that no class is less fit to govern than that which governs us now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

What the hell kind of goofball, tin foil nonsense is this??? NAFTA has always included Canada. That's why it's called NAFTA...as in North America.

7 posted on 05/19/2006 7:02:27 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Interesting. It connects some of the dots for a clearer picture. The question is can we stop it?


8 posted on 05/19/2006 7:03:20 AM PDT by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
I will not reject this out of hand, but when it comes to multi-government conspiracies, I set the bar high.

Links to a .pdf of an authentic CFR document would have been appreciated. That, and proper spelling of Fox's first name. Sloppy.

9 posted on 05/19/2006 7:03:48 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Religious Persecution is ALWAYS wrong. Unless Chinese or Muslims are doing it. </sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Exactly. And the fact that Bush has been pursuing this agenda without telling the US people, is worse than despicable.

You cannot believe everything you read. That's Dan Rathers job...

10 posted on 05/19/2006 7:04:03 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

If this were true, George W Bush would be the biggest, worst traitor of them all, and we have a splendid array of them these days. This would outdo Jimmah Cawtuh and the Demons from Dogpatch.

I hope it isn't true. But I don't want to put my head in the sand. So, if it is true, I say, "Come, Lord Jesus!".


11 posted on 05/19/2006 7:04:42 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jer. 17:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Good morning,
i am not sure what to think about this article...It looks like bull sh*t...Too much subjective words and the fact that canada has been long ago included in Nafta...Looks like a blend of the past and the present...Will wait and see.

Best regards.
12 posted on 05/19/2006 7:05:11 AM PDT by astoundedlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagar

No joke, no tinfoil. Every word of this is true. Ever wonder why, despite 9/11, Bush did nothing about the southern border? Why he and Fox are so buddy/buddy, why he's ignored the wishes of the American people? (Oh, well, you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs.)


13 posted on 05/19/2006 7:05:18 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

This is from Jerome R. Corsi the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?


14 posted on 05/19/2006 7:05:34 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Evidence that this writer is talking through his hat is in this article itself. The writer claims that Bush intends to "expand NAFTA to include Canada." Helloooo. NAFTA already INCLUDES Canada.

We do not have a problem with "free trade" across the Canadian border because Canada is a developed country with a high standard of living. Canadians are not lined up by the thousands trying to sneak across the border into the US.

The problem is that Mexico, unlike Canada, is a badly-run, third-world country which is deliberately using the US to outsource its poverty problem. That's why we need to slam the Mexican border shut, and need to worry far less about the Canadian border.

Any fool can see the difference between Canada and Mexico, except the writer of this article, apparently.

P.S. My primary is over, but because of certain legal and ethical problems, the incumbent, Charles Taylor may withdraw/be forced out, and I am in the running to be chosen as the replacement nominee for Congress in the 11th District of NC. For more information, see the article below, and my website. I still need your help.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "What a Week! What a Week!"

15 posted on 05/19/2006 7:07:55 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments.

OK. Research time. Who are the members of the U.S working group? Is this group now meeting with it's Mexican counterpart? Has the group issued any public reports or press releases?

16 posted on 05/19/2006 7:08:28 AM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Amnesty and Immigration Explosion Bill of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies; All
No comment ( yet ) but here are the borders links:

For "Thunder on the Border," click the picture:


17 posted on 05/19/2006 7:08:56 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

This sounds like Bircher B.S. to me. I'm not buying it.


18 posted on 05/19/2006 7:09:26 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Some Dare Call It Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study



19 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:16 AM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

I think that a North American Confederation of states is inevitable. When it will happen is a little hard to call, but say within 25 years. Read it and weep.


20 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:41 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagar
I've never thought of Phyllis Schlafly as a tin foil hat kook. Do you?

21 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:55 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
Thx...worth a repeat...

This is from Jerome R. Corsi the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?

22 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:58 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
This is from Jerome R. Corsi the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?

Yes

23 posted on 05/19/2006 7:12:49 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
We do not have a problem with "free trade" across the Canadian border because Canada is a developed country with a high standard of living.

Sorry, Congressman, just try to haul a load of wheat up there sometime.

24 posted on 05/19/2006 7:12:54 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.spp.gov/

Well everyone, let's have a look at what they say they're up to.


25 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:03 AM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Amnesty and Immigration Explosion Bill of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

It might be Bush's plan, but I doubt that the Canadians and Mexicans will go along.


26 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:27 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

""our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.""

That's a Satanic lie. Our security is our Air Force, Marines, Army, Navy and Coast Guard, in that order, and what there is of a Border Patrol and the Immigration Service and Airport Security.

Our prosperity is Blessed private enterprise, the freer of government the better, and American toughness and ingenuity, such as survived the Depression, won two world wars and still is the earth's only bulwark against tyrranny.

God damn the devils (they already are) who are attempting to dismantel this God-given land of ours and join it to harlots and thieves.

The Skull & Bones and CFR people are hellions seeking to see how many they can take to Hell with them. They don't give a rap for anything but power that massages their egos - same thing as Kim Il Sung.


27 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:59 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jer. 17:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Corsi did very sloppy, minimal research for this-almost as though he is trying to discredit the whole idea. As others have mentioned, NAFTA has always included Canada. However, there really is (or was) a plan to expand NAFTA by including South and Central America in something called the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). However, the prospective SA and CA members were less than lukewarm, prefering to strengthen ties among themselves and with the EU due to their distrust of DC. Anyone interested can do a google search on FTAA for themselves,especially on the Miami summit where the FTAA was declared 'dead in the water'.


28 posted on 05/19/2006 7:14:02 AM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1602247/posts?page=2#2


29 posted on 05/19/2006 7:15:53 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Immigration Control and Border Security -The jobs George W. Bush doesn't want to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Well, if this is a secret bluleprint by the CFR toward world gummint, they're pretty stupid to offer the plan for sale: http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=8102
30 posted on 05/19/2006 7:16:16 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

I will say, I've wondered about the Union stories too. But every time I chase down sources on these issues, I keep bumping into Clinton.

http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/2000/sept00/psrsept00.html

Apparently, Clinton signed 'something' while he was in office, I don't understand the validity of what he signed.

And with the Bush Administration quiet on the topic, it leaves room for rumors.

It does seem that Bolton is giving the UN a run for its money. That is reassuring.

I would love to know more about these topics though because the NGOs seem to be running most of our demise.


31 posted on 05/19/2006 7:16:59 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
There was a site called Stop the FTAA.Com. Looks like it's now an anti-illegal immigration site , which confirms that the FTAA, if not dead, is at least no longer the done deal it once seemed to be.
32 posted on 05/19/2006 7:17:18 AM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

"Our security is our Air Force, Marines, Army, Navy and Coast Guard, in that order, and what there is of a Border Patrol and the Immigration Service and Airport Security. "

I don't mean to leave out the Minutemen, those brave volunteers with the guts to go to the border and do what our hand-holding-with-the-Saudi-Prince President refuses to do - uphold our constitution and defend our nation here at home.


33 posted on 05/19/2006 7:19:56 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jer. 17:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
I guess this explains why there was no mass exodus to Canada after the last election. We are going to be all one big happy family anyway.< /sarcasm>
34 posted on 05/19/2006 7:20:55 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
I suppose it's time for a herd of man-eating robots to descend upon Corsi now, formerly a FR hero of SwiftVets fame.

Incoming!
35 posted on 05/19/2006 7:20:57 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union

They didn't tell the truth to the British people either, when they were roped into the EU. The leadership ignored the British people, just as our leaders are ignoring us now. The technique is to ignore the people as they get the US so enmeshed and weakened by their globalist policies that only a desperately painful cataclysm can get us out. And their hope is that the American people no longer have the fortitude to endure what it will take to set our country back to rights.
36 posted on 05/19/2006 7:21:58 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

It has all the earmarks of Agenda 21.


37 posted on 05/19/2006 7:22:11 AM PDT by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

I think he meant to write CAFTA, the Central American Free Trade Agreement.........


38 posted on 05/19/2006 7:22:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Corsi went over the deep end a long time ago.

He certainly does not have access to the President's "secret plans."

The man is nuts.


39 posted on 05/19/2006 7:22:31 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
It has all the earmarks of Agenda 21.

It has all the earmarks of Directive 10-289.............

40 posted on 05/19/2006 7:23:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
That sounds bizarre as hell, but on the other hand the bizarre is becoming more and more to represent the norm in this twisted world of ours.

I'm witholding judgment on this until Rush has a chance to analyze it and give us a report.
41 posted on 05/19/2006 7:24:55 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (A government that will not enforce the laws of the land, is a government standing on quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Building a North American Community

A North American Approach to Security
42 posted on 05/19/2006 7:26:01 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I suppose it's time for a herd of man-eating robots to descend upon Corsi now, formerly a FR hero of SwiftVets fame.

We thank him for his service to our country (torpedoing the USS John F'ing Kerry), but that doesn't mean we have to follow him anywhere.

43 posted on 05/19/2006 7:26:14 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
We thank him for his service to our country (torpedoing the USS John F'ing Kerry), but that doesn't mean we have to follow him anywhere.

Of course not. But many enlightened thinkers consider a hobby of cannabilism to be unhealthy.
44 posted on 05/19/2006 7:28:00 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Directive 10-289 ends economic and personal freedom in the United States. The government now controls every aspect of an individual’s economic life; it is a dictatorship.

This?

45 posted on 05/19/2006 7:28:33 AM PDT by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sittnick
Right. Canada's Mulroney, Mexico's Salinas, and the USA's Bush 41 came up with the original treaty - and Bubba Clinton got the thing through a reluctant Congress. Clinton and Rubin bailed Mexico out of bankruptcy with $ 40 billion, and we were told that NAFTA would put Mexico on the road to prosperity. Instead it just put Mexico on the road north.

Economic marriage between the USA and Canada made economic sense, but hitching the American economy to a corrupt third-world narco-state like Mexico was simply stupid. It also had the effect of destroying Mexican agriculture which could not compete in a free market with efficient American agribusinesses - so the peasants facing starvation head al norte.

46 posted on 05/19/2006 7:29:02 AM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Yes.......


47 posted on 05/19/2006 7:30:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
I've never thought of Phyllis Schlafly as a tin foil hat kook. Do you?

Well, I had to wonder about her when she wrote an article that claimed that since Barbara and Laura Bush are pro-choice, Harriet Miers must be also. After all, they're all women in GWB's life.

That's crazy.

At the very least, the woman is fallible.

48 posted on 05/19/2006 7:30:45 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: F.J. Mitchell
That sounds bizarre as hell, but on the other hand the bizarre is becoming more and more to represent the norm in this twisted world of ours.

That's exactly what I thought and the very reason I posted it.

50 posted on 05/19/2006 7:32:24 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,401-1,427 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson