Skip to comments.North American Union to Replace USA? ("is this the plan?" alert!)
Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesnt President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
WTH? I'm not sure if I should search for my tinfoil or duck from the looming black helicopter across from my lawn.
He'd have a helluva lot of work to do with only two years left in his term (barring John Conyers).
Exactly. And the fact that Bush has been pursuing this agenda without telling the US people, is worse than despicable.
seems, there are more moves on the globe to create similar kinds of regional 'authorities'
soon, all that is needed is a world government on top of all these regional 'Unions', and we just happen to have a UN about... world government might not be far away, think 15-20 years, tops.
how about that for a conspiracy theory?
What the hell kind of goofball, tin foil nonsense is this??? NAFTA has always included Canada. That's why it's called NAFTA...as in North America.
Interesting. It connects some of the dots for a clearer picture. The question is can we stop it?
Links to a .pdf of an authentic CFR document would have been appreciated. That, and proper spelling of Fox's first name. Sloppy.
You cannot believe everything you read. That's Dan Rathers job...
If this were true, George W Bush would be the biggest, worst traitor of them all, and we have a splendid array of them these days. This would outdo Jimmah Cawtuh and the Demons from Dogpatch.
I hope it isn't true. But I don't want to put my head in the sand. So, if it is true, I say, "Come, Lord Jesus!".
No joke, no tinfoil. Every word of this is true. Ever wonder why, despite 9/11, Bush did nothing about the southern border? Why he and Fox are so buddy/buddy, why he's ignored the wishes of the American people? (Oh, well, you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs.)
This is from Jerome R. Corsi the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?
We do not have a problem with "free trade" across the Canadian border because Canada is a developed country with a high standard of living. Canadians are not lined up by the thousands trying to sneak across the border into the US.
The problem is that Mexico, unlike Canada, is a badly-run, third-world country which is deliberately using the US to outsource its poverty problem. That's why we need to slam the Mexican border shut, and need to worry far less about the Canadian border.
Any fool can see the difference between Canada and Mexico, except the writer of this article, apparently.
P.S. My primary is over, but because of certain legal and ethical problems, the incumbent, Charles Taylor may withdraw/be forced out, and I am in the running to be chosen as the replacement nominee for Congress in the 11th District of NC. For more information, see the article below, and my website. I still need your help.
OK. Research time. Who are the members of the U.S working group? Is this group now meeting with it's Mexican counterpart? Has the group issued any public reports or press releases?
This sounds like Bircher B.S. to me. I'm not buying it.
I think that a North American Confederation of states is inevitable. When it will happen is a little hard to call, but say within 25 years. Read it and weep.
This is from the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?
Sorry, Congressman, just try to haul a load of wheat up there sometime.
Well everyone, let's have a look at what they say they're up to.
It might be Bush's plan, but I doubt that the Canadians and Mexicans will go along.
""our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.""
That's a Satanic lie. Our security is our Air Force, Marines, Army, Navy and Coast Guard, in that order, and what there is of a Border Patrol and the Immigration Service and Airport Security.
Our prosperity is Blessed private enterprise, the freer of government the better, and American toughness and ingenuity, such as survived the Depression, won two world wars and still is the earth's only bulwark against tyrranny.
God damn the devils (they already are) who are attempting to dismantel this God-given land of ours and join it to harlots and thieves.
The Skull & Bones and CFR people are hellions seeking to see how many they can take to Hell with them. They don't give a rap for anything but power that massages their egos - same thing as Kim Il Sung.
Corsi did very sloppy, minimal research for this-almost as though he is trying to discredit the whole idea. As others have mentioned, NAFTA has always included Canada. However, there really is (or was) a plan to expand NAFTA by including South and Central America in something called the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). However, the prospective SA and CA members were less than lukewarm, prefering to strengthen ties among themselves and with the EU due to their distrust of DC. Anyone interested can do a google search on FTAA for themselves,especially on the Miami summit where the FTAA was declared 'dead in the water'.
I will say, I've wondered about the Union stories too. But every time I chase down sources on these issues, I keep bumping into Clinton.
Apparently, Clinton signed 'something' while he was in office, I don't understand the validity of what he signed.
And with the Bush Administration quiet on the topic, it leaves room for rumors.
It does seem that Bolton is giving the UN a run for its money. That is reassuring.
I would love to know more about these topics though because the NGOs seem to be running most of our demise.
"Our security is our Air Force, Marines, Army, Navy and Coast Guard, in that order, and what there is of a Border Patrol and the Immigration Service and Airport Security. "
I don't mean to leave out the Minutemen, those brave volunteers with the guts to go to the border and do what our hand-holding-with-the-Saudi-Prince President refuses to do - uphold our constitution and defend our nation here at home.
It has all the earmarks of Agenda 21.
I think he meant to write CAFTA, the Central American Free Trade Agreement.........
Corsi went over the deep end a long time ago.
He certainly does not have access to the President's "secret plans."
The man is nuts.
It has all the earmarks of Directive 10-289.............
We thank him for his service to our country (torpedoing the USS John F'ing Kerry), but that doesn't mean we have to follow him anywhere.
Economic marriage between the USA and Canada made economic sense, but hitching the American economy to a corrupt third-world narco-state like Mexico was simply stupid. It also had the effect of destroying Mexican agriculture which could not compete in a free market with efficient American agribusinesses - so the peasants facing starvation head al norte.
Well, I had to wonder about her when she wrote an article that claimed that since Barbara and Laura Bush are pro-choice, Harriet Miers must be also. After all, they're all women in GWB's life.
At the very least, the woman is fallible.
That's exactly what I thought and the very reason I posted it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.