Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
You wait and see how many illegals cross the border when this happens.
Free trade has made communism more entrenched in China? Surely you don't believe that. China's growing middle class may be our best hope of changing that government. Certainly trade sctions have not made Castro less communist.
There is no good thing about the road toward destruction in which America is headed.
List some.
"The document tells the story of merging Canada, the US and Mexico, with one common parameter border, which of course is exactly what is happening."
In what way.
"The evidence that Bush is working from the plan is that this process started before the Bush administration."
If you can support your previous two statements this one might make a little more sense.
That would be me except I'm a major in the National Guard and work for Fedex. But he sounds like a smart guy. I suppose he's another CFR member plotting to end American sovereignty.
Great. I'm glad you've read the whole document. Then you must realize why several of your questions make no sense (like...."How can a US based nongovernmental organization claim for a goal of a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America? Surely that is out of their realm of influence as US citizens".)
BTW, you have yet to address the fact that attacking America's sovereignty, as well as Canada's, is part and parcel of NAFTA's goals.
A relation of yours?
Ok now, have you read the document?
I don't know him and never read his book. Perhaps you can explain what concerns you about his book.
FYI... Pukin will win this war.
He's got more power than the rest.
Avoid him - if you want to stay a FReeper.
Yet you offer nothing to back up your claims that the goal of the CFR is "to weaken national sovereignty and push towards the establishment of a North American superstate." Instead, you say "I came away with the distinct impression that what they stand for is exactly what I stated before." Give some specifics of what gave you that impression? You have already questioned why a very broad cross section of some of the most accomplished experts on United States foreign affairs would retain their membership in such an organization. You simply haven't offered any evidence to support the CFR is what you say it is, and among the best evidence to say it isn't is that it retains the members it does.
Yes. And just one more reason why I know what I'm talking about when I describe the motives and loyalties of many of the members of the CFR. I've worked for or have known several of them. Every single one of them men who have dedicated (and in many cases risked) their lives to preserving American sovereignty.
Why don't you show us where the CFR upholds the sovereignty of the United States and the authority of the US citizen to direct their government and government policy as opposed to an NGO like the CFR and their "task forces"?
I have never given any indication that suggests I haven't. Instead, I have given you direct quotes from the document referenced with page numbers. And instead of asking questions about the document whose answers are clearly found within its first pages, I have been forced to copy and paste the answers for you after you asked questions that revealed either zero reading comprehension ability, or the fact that you hadn't read the document in the first place.
If you have really read the whole document now, I expect you won't be asking many of the same questions you asked earlier in this thread, because you already know the answers.
Why didn't you say so when I asked you if you had any affiliations with the CFR?
It is an organization whose members are free to quit whenever they want. It is an organization who allows its members to practice the great American right of freedom of speech. Since you read the document we used to be talking about, you must have noticed that after 33 pages of analysis and recommendations, there were 7 pages of dissent and additions provided by individual CFR members.
And it baffles we why you think any organization in this nation has a binding authority over the policies of this government. There are THOUSANDS of privately run organizations operating in this country, all publishing papers and recommendations. Again, that is part of the free speech we enjoy as American citizens. Are you suggesting that the members of the CFR should not be allowed to participate in a Council whose focus is something they all share a mutual interest and expertise in? Would you also like to get rid of the NRA?
I don't. I've got a gay cousin living in New York, a liberal artist sister in Portland, and a neurosurgeon sister-in-law living in Georgia. But I don't have any affiliation with the organizations they belong to either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.